IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i4p3430-d1067164.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Program Arrives Home Smoothly: Uncertainty-Based Routing Scheduling of Home-Based Elderly Care Programs

Author

Listed:
  • Shaojun Chen

    (School of Public Administration, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

  • Xiaoqing Wu

    (School of Public Administration, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

  • Jing Wu

    (School of Public Administration, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

  • Xueqing Hong

    (School of Public Administration, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

Abstract

In China, the home-based elderly care program system plays an important role in meeting the needs of elderly individuals. The routing scheduling of home-based elderly care (RSHEC) programs is closely related to the quality of the home-based elderly care programs. The structural supply problem faced by home-based elderly care programs is a prominent problem, and the RSHEC programs are an important aspect that has rarely been studied. This paper explores RSHEC programs under uncertainty by comprehensively considering the costs of home-based elderly care, such as the fixed costs, time, and transportation costs. First, a deterministic mixed integer programming (MIP) model was constructed to solve the general routing scheduling problem. In addition, to effectively cope with the uncertainty and risk of the modern market, the robust optimization theory and algorithm model are introduced, namely, the mixed integer box set robust optimization (MIBRO) model and the mixed integer ellipsoid set robust optimization (MIERO) model. Finally, MATLAB and the Gurobi package are applied to obtain the solutions of the models. The case verification shows that the MIP model has the lowest total cost under deterministic conditions. However, the MIERO and MIBRO models can achieve more robust RSHEC programs under uncertain conditions. The results prove the effectiveness and feasibility of the optimization model and algorithm, which provides reference value for management decisions regarding home-based elderly care programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Shaojun Chen & Xiaoqing Wu & Jing Wu & Xueqing Hong, 2023. "Program Arrives Home Smoothly: Uncertainty-Based Routing Scheduling of Home-Based Elderly Care Programs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3430-:d:1067164
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3430/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3430/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Junwei & Yu, Yang & Tang, Jiafu, 2018. "Compensation and profit distribution for cooperative green pickup and delivery problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 54-69.
    2. Dimitris Bertsimas & Melvyn Sim, 2004. "The Price of Robustness," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(1), pages 35-53, February.
    3. Huimin Li, 2022. "The Impact of Sustainable Development on the Public Health System of the Elderly in the Internet of Things Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-14, December.
    4. John M. Mulvey & Robert J. Vanderbei & Stavros A. Zenios, 1995. "Robust Optimization of Large-Scale Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 43(2), pages 264-281, April.
    5. Ji, Ying & Du, Jianhui & Han, Xiaoya & Wu, Xiaoqing & Huang, Ripeng & Wang, Shilei & Liu, Zhimin, 2020. "A mixed integer robust programming model for two-echelon inventory routing problem of perishable products," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 548(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xuejie Bai & Yankui Liu, 2016. "Robust optimization of supply chain network design in fuzzy decision system," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 27(6), pages 1131-1149, December.
    2. Antonio G. Martín & Manuel Díaz-Madroñero & Josefa Mula, 2020. "Master production schedule using robust optimization approaches in an automobile second-tier supplier," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 28(1), pages 143-166, March.
    3. Sebastian Rachuba & Brigitte Werners, 2017. "A fuzzy multi-criteria approach for robust operating room schedules," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 251(1), pages 325-350, April.
    4. Roy, Bernard, 2010. "Robustness in operational research and decision aiding: A multi-faceted issue," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(3), pages 629-638, February.
    5. Hanks, Robert W. & Weir, Jeffery D. & Lunday, Brian J., 2017. "Robust goal programming using different robustness echelons via norm-based and ellipsoidal uncertainty sets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(2), pages 636-646.
    6. Donya Rahmani, 2019. "Designing a robust and dynamic network for the emergency blood supply chain with the risk of disruptions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 613-641, December.
    7. Soudabeh Seyyedi Ghomi & Fahimeh Baroughi, 2024. "Robust vertex centdian facility location problem on tree networks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 341(2), pages 1135-1149, October.
    8. Seyed Babak Ebrahimi & Ehsan Bagheri, 2022. "A multi-objective formulation for the closed-loop plastic supply chain under uncertainty," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 4725-4768, November.
    9. Mohsen Jalalimajidi & SM Seyedhosseini & Ahmad Makui & Masoud Babakhani, 2018. "Developing a comprehensive model for new energy replacement in the country’s development program using a robust optimization approach," Energy & Environment, , vol. 29(6), pages 868-890, September.
    10. Gilani, H. & Sahebi, H. & Oliveira, Fabricio, 2020. "Sustainable sugarcane-to-bioethanol supply chain network design: A robust possibilistic programming model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    11. Mavrotas, George & Figueira, José Rui & Siskos, Eleftherios, 2015. "Robustness analysis methodology for multi-objective combinatorial optimization problems and application to project selection," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 142-155.
    12. Donya Rahmani & Arash Zandi & Sara Behdad & Arezou Entezaminia, 2021. "A light robust model for aggregate production planning with consideration of environmental impacts of machines," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 273-297, March.
    13. Levent Eriskin & Mumtaz Karatas, 2024. "Applying robust optimization to the shelter location–allocation problem: a case study for Istanbul," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 339(3), pages 1589-1635, August.
    14. Tao Yao & Supreet Mandala & Byung Chung, 2009. "Evacuation Transportation Planning Under Uncertainty: A Robust Optimization Approach," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 9(2), pages 171-189, June.
    15. Cleber D. Rocco & Reinaldo Morabito, 2016. "Robust optimisation approach applied to the analysis of production / logistics and crop planning in the tomato processing industry," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(19), pages 5842-5861, October.
    16. Mohammad Heydari & Yanan Fan & Kin Keung Lai, 2023. "A Robust Site Selection Model under uncertainty for Special Hospital Wards in Hong Kong," Papers 2307.11508, arXiv.org.
    17. Jornada, Daniel & Leon, V. Jorge, 2016. "Robustness methodology to aid multiobjective decision making in the electricity generation capacity expansion problem to minimize cost and water withdrawal," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1089-1108.
    18. Shi, Yi & Vanhaverbeke, Lieselot & Xu, Jiuping, 2024. "Electric vehicle routing optimization for sustainable kitchen waste reverse logistics network using robust mixed-integer programming," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    19. Alysson Costa & Lana Santos & Douglas Alem & Ricardo Santos, 2014. "Sustainable vegetable crop supply problem with perishable stocks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 219(1), pages 265-283, August.
    20. Jornada, Daniel & Leon, V. Jorge, 2016. "Biobjective robust optimization over the efficient set for Pareto set reduction," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(2), pages 573-586.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3430-:d:1067164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.