IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i4p3120-d1062198.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Market Drivers on the Digital Maturity of Logistics Processes in a Supply Chain

Author

Listed:
  • Paulina Golinska-Dawson

    (Institute of Logistics, Faculty of Engineering Management, Poznan University of Technology, 60-965 Poznan, Poland)

  • Karolina Werner-Lewandowska

    (Institute of Logistics, Faculty of Engineering Management, Poznan University of Technology, 60-965 Poznan, Poland)

  • Karolina Kolinska

    (Poznan School of Logistics, 61-755 Poznan, Poland)

  • Adam Kolinski

    (Lukasiewicz Research Network—Poznan Institute of Technology, 61-755 Poznan, Poland)

Abstract

Logistics processes allow for the movement of goods along the supply chain to the customers. Companies are using digital solutions more widely to support their logistics processes. Current studies focus mainly on the intrinsic perspective of the digital maturity of logistics processes. Rarely do previous studies consider the impact of external factors (e.g., market trends, as external drivers at the strategic level) on the digital maturity of logistics processes. In this paper, our aim is to propose a novel generic approach to measuring the level of adoption of digital technologies in logistics processes. We applied the maturity model theory to provide a generic framework for the assessment of different partners in supply chains (suppliers, manufacturers, retailers, e-tailers, logistics service providers) in a homogeneous way. We propose the five levels (Avoiding, Discovering, Adopting, Improving, Excelling) to measure the frequency of the application of the digital technologies with high intelligence in the domain of logistics processes. Furthermore, we investigate the relationship between the selected market trends, which are external drivers at the strategic level, and the digital maturity of logics processes. We conducted the survey among a group of 38 companies to classify their maturity level and then to test which market trends motivate them to digitalize their processes. We applied Bayesian statistics to test the level of the relationship between the digitalization of logistics processes and four market trends, namely, the sustainability, e-commerce, sharing economy, and speed-orientation of customers. The results show that all the trends tested moderately and positively influence the digital maturity of logistics processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Paulina Golinska-Dawson & Karolina Werner-Lewandowska & Karolina Kolinska & Adam Kolinski, 2023. "Impact of Market Drivers on the Digital Maturity of Logistics Processes in a Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3120-:d:1062198
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3120/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3120/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karolina Werner-Lewandowska & Paulina Golinska-Dawson, 2021. "Sustainable Logistics Management Maturity—The Theoretical Assessment Framework and Empirical Results from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-19, May.
    2. Lukasz Brzezinski & Lukasz Hadas & Piotr Cyplik, 2021. "The Transformation of the Business Model of SMEs due to COVID-19 Pandemic," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2B), pages 915-924.
    3. Jeroen Beliën & Robert Boute & Stefan Creemers & Philippe de Bruecker & Joren Gijsbrechts & Silvia Valeria Padilla Tinoco & Wouter Verheyen, 2017. "Collaborative Shipping : Logistics in the Sharing Economy," Post-Print hal-01797315, HAL.
    4. Yang, Miying & Fu, Mingtao & Zhang, Zihan, 2021. "The adoption of digital technologies in supply chains: Drivers, process and impact," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    5. Karolina Werner-Lewandowsk & Piotr Lubinski & Jolanta Sloniec, 2021. "The Effect of Covid-19 on Consumer Behavior in Poland - Preliminary Research Results," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 405-416.
    6. Arunachalam, Deepak & Kumar, Niraj & Kawalek, John Paul, 2018. "Understanding big data analytics capabilities in supply chain management: Unravelling the issues, challenges and implications for practice," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 416-436.
    7. Benedict G. C. Dellaert, 2019. "The consumer production journey: marketing to consumers as co-producers in the sharing economy," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 238-254, March.
    8. Bergmann, Felix M. & Wagner, Stephan M. & Winkenbach, Matthias, 2020. "Integrating first-mile pickup and last-mile delivery on shared vehicle routes for efficient urban e-commerce distribution," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 26-62.
    9. K. L. Choy & G. T. S. Ho & C. K. H. Lee, 2017. "A RFID-based storage assignment system for enhancing the efficiency of order picking," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 111-129, January.
    10. Caro, Felipe & Sadr, Ramin, 2019. "The Internet of Things (IoT) in retail: Bridging supply and demand," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 47-54.
    11. Wang, Yingli & Singgih, Meita & Wang, Jingyao & Rit, Mihaela, 2019. "Making sense of blockchain technology: How will it transform supply chains?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 221-236.
    12. Chowdhury, Priyabrata & Paul, Sanjoy Kumar & Kaisar, Shahriar & Moktadir, Md. Abdul, 2021. "COVID-19 pandemic related supply chain studies: A systematic review," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    13. Jörg Becker & Michael Rosemann & Maximilian Röglinger & Michael Muehlen, 2012. "Business Process Management," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 4(5), pages 227-228, October.
    14. Shoufeng Ji & Qi Sun, 2017. "Low-Carbon Planning and Design in B&R Logistics Service: A Case Study of an E-Commerce Big Data Platform in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-27, November.
    15. Hendrik S. Birkel & Johannes W. Veile & Julian M. Müller & Evi Hartmann & Kai-Ingo Voigt, 2019. "Development of a Risk Framework for Industry 4.0 in the Context of Sustainability for Established Manufacturers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-27, January.
    16. Julia Siderska, 2021. "The Adoption of Robotic Process Automation Technology to Ensure Business Processes during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-20, July.
    17. Rodrigue, Jean-Paul, 2020. "The distribution network of Amazon and the footprint of freight digitalization," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    18. Mohamed Ben-Daya & Elkafi Hassini & Zied Bahroun, 2019. "Internet of things and supply chain management: a literature review," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(15-16), pages 4719-4742, August.
    19. Arim Park & Huan Li, 2021. "The Effect of Blockchain Technology on Supply Chain Sustainability Performances," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    20. Gunasekaran, Angappa & Subramanian, Nachiappan & Papadopoulos, Thanos, 2017. "Information technology for competitive advantage within logistics and supply chains: A review," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 14-33.
    21. Vitor W. B. Martins & Rosley Anholon & Osvaldo L. G. Quelhas & Walter Leal Filho, 2019. "Sustainable Practices in Logistics Systems: An Overview of Companies in Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-12, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dimas Haki Prayogo & Roman Domanski & Paulina Golinska-Dawson, 2024. "The Key Factors for Improving Returns Management in E-Commerce in Indonesia from Customers’ Perspectives—An Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Khushboo E-Fatima & Rasoul Khandan & Amin Hosseinian-Far & Dilshad Sarwar, 2023. "The Adoption of Robotic Process Automation Considering Financial Aspects in Beef Supply Chains: An Approach towards Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-34, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Miying & Fu, Mingtao & Zhang, Zihan, 2021. "The adoption of digital technologies in supply chains: Drivers, process and impact," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    2. Abirami Raja Santhi & Padmakumar Muthuswamy, 2022. "Pandemic, War, Natural Calamities, and Sustainability: Industry 4.0 Technologies to Overcome Traditional and Contemporary Supply Chain Challenges," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-32, November.
    3. Damian Dubisz & Paulina Golinska-Dawson & Przemysław Zawodny, 2022. "Measuring CO 2 Emissions in E-Commerce Deliveries: From Empirical Studies to a New Calculation Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-20, December.
    4. Priom Mahmud & Sanjoy Kumar Paul & Abdullahil Azeem & Priyabrata Chowdhury, 2021. "Evaluating Supply Chain Collaboration Barriers in Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-28, July.
    5. Seyyed-Alireza Radmanesh & Alireza Haji & Omid Fatahi Valilai, 2023. "Blockchain-Based Architecture for a Sustainable Supply Chain in Cloud Architecture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-19, June.
    6. Özden Tozanlı & Elif Kongar & Surendra M. Gupta, 2020. "Evaluation of Waste Electronic Product Trade-in Strategies in Predictive Twin Disassembly Systems in the Era of Blockchain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-33, July.
    7. Md Al Amin & Dewan Hafiz Nabil & Roberto Baldacci & Md. Habibur Rahman, 2023. "Exploring Blockchain Implementation Challenges for Sustainable Supply Chains: An Integrated Fuzzy TOPSIS–ISM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-25, September.
    8. Saha, Esha & Rathore, Pradeep & Parida, Ratri & Rana, Nripendra P., 2022. "The interplay of emerging technologies in pharmaceutical supply chain performance: An empirical investigation for the rise of Pharma 4.0," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    9. Fei Li & Yang Zhao & Jaime Ortiz & Yan Chen, 2023. "How Does Digital Technology Innovation Affect the Internationalization Performance of Chinese Enterprises? The Moderating Effect of Sustainability Readiness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-25, July.
    10. Choi, Tsan-Ming & Wen, Xin & Sun, Xuting & Chung, Sai-Ho, 2019. "The mean-variance approach for global supply chain risk analysis with air logistics in the blockchain technology era," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 178-191.
    11. Kouhizadeh, Mahtab & Saberi, Sara & Sarkis, Joseph, 2021. "Blockchain technology and the sustainable supply chain: Theoretically exploring adoption barriers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    12. Huynh, Cong Minh & Nguyen, Minh Quoc Bao, 2024. "Factors Influencing Blockchain Adoption in Logistics: A Customer-Centric Study in Vietnam," MPRA Paper 121251, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Sara Pourmorshed & Susanne Durst, 2022. "The Usefulness of the Digitalization Integration Framework for Developing Digital Supply Chains in SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-17, November.
    14. Tamvada, Jagannadha Pawan & Narula, Sanjiv & Audretsch, David & Puppala, Harish & Kumar, Anil, 2022. "Adopting new technology is a distant dream? The risks of implementing Industry 4.0 in emerging economy SMEs," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    15. Marisol Valencia Cárdenas & Mayerlin Roldán Sepúlveda & Diego Alejandro López Cadavid & Jorge Anibal Restrepo Morales & Juan Gabriel Vanegas López, 2022. "Omnicanalidad como estrategia competitiva: una revisión conceptual y dimensional," Estudios Gerenciales, Universidad Icesi, vol. 38(164), pages 370-384, September.
    16. Karolina Werner-Lewandowska & Paulina Golinska-Dawson, 2021. "Sustainable Logistics Management Maturity—The Theoretical Assessment Framework and Empirical Results from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-19, May.
    17. Ashish Dwivedi & Dindayal Agrawal & Ajay Jha & Massimo Gastaldi & Sanjoy Kumar Paul & Idiano D’Adamo, 2021. "Addressing the Challenges to Sustainable Initiatives in Value Chain Flexibility: Implications for Sustainable Development Goals," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 22(2), pages 179-197, December.
    18. Aurelija Burinskienė, 2021. "Designing a Multi-Stage Transport System Serving e-Commerce Activity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, May.
    19. Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2020. "Internet based elastic logistics platforms for fashion quick response systems in the digital era," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    20. Justy, Théo & Pellegrin-Boucher, Estelle & Lescop, Denis & Granata, Julien & Gupta, Shivam, 2023. "On the edge of Big Data: Drivers and barriers to data analytics adoption in SMEs," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3120-:d:1062198. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.