IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i4p3050-d1061212.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ready, Steady, Go? Obstacles to the Spread of Eco-Social Work Approaches: An Italian Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Elisa Matutini

    (Department of Philosophy and Cultural Heritage, Ca’ Foscari University, Malcanton Marcorà, Dorsoduro 3484/D, 30123 Venice, Italy)

  • Maurizio Busacca

    (Department of Philosophy and Cultural Heritage, Ca’ Foscari University, Malcanton Marcorà, Dorsoduro 3484/D, 30123 Venice, Italy)

  • Barbara Da Roit

    (Department of Philosophy and Cultural Heritage, Ca’ Foscari University, Malcanton Marcorà, Dorsoduro 3484/D, 30123 Venice, Italy)

Abstract

While eco-social work as a strategy that combines responses to environmental and social risks is gaining ground in Europe, it has not evenly spread across countries. This paper looks at Italy, a country in which eco-social work has arrived only recently and has found difficulty establishing itself, in order to understand the factors that have hindered and fostered its development. To do so, it explores two cases of eco-social innovation and, using a neo-institutionalist framework, the mechanisms at work in encouraging or impeding the establishment of eco-social work. The research suggests three mutually reinforcing obstacles to the spread of eco-social work in an Italian context: the limited space for eco-social work in the Italian policy agenda; the inability to reframe practices used by existing work integration initiatives; and the reproduction of established relationships between public and non-profit organisations in a competition for scarce resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Elisa Matutini & Maurizio Busacca & Barbara Da Roit, 2023. "Ready, Steady, Go? Obstacles to the Spread of Eco-Social Work Approaches: An Italian Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3050-:d:1061212
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3050/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3050/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luisa Sturiale & Alessandro Scuderi, 2018. "The Evaluation of Green Investments in Urban Areas: A Proposal of an eco-social-green Model of the City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Shepsle, Kenneth A., 2016. "The Rules of the Game: What Rules? Which Game?," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 282, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    3. Geoffrey M. Kistruck & Paul W. Beamish, 2010. "The Interplay of Form, Structure, and Embeddedness in Social Intrapreneurship," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 34(4), pages 735-761, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Derk Jan Stobbelaar, 2020. "Impact of Student Interventions on Urban Greening Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Beamish, Paul W. & Lupton, Nathaniel C., 2016. "Cooperative strategies in international business and management: Reflections on the past 50 years and future directions," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 163-175.
    3. Imran Ahmed Shah & Tamas Csordas & Umair Akram & Amit Yadav & Hassan Rasool, 2020. "Multifaceted Role of Job Embeddedness Within Organizations: Development of Sustainable Approach to Reducing Turnover Intention," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, June.
    4. Alex Nicholls, 2010. "The Legitimacy of Social Entrepreneurship: Reflexive Isomorphism in a Pre–Paradigmatic Field," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 34(4), pages 611-633, July.
    5. Etxano, Iker & Villalba-Eguiluz, Unai, 2021. "Twenty-five years of social multi-criteria evaluation (SMCE) in the search for sustainability: Analysis of case studies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    6. EuiBeom Jeong & Hanna Yoo, 2022. "A systematic literature review of women in social entrepreneurship," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 16(4), pages 935-970, December.
    7. Luisa Sturiale & Alessandro Scuderi & Giuseppe Timpanaro, 2022. "A Multicriteria Decision-Making Approach of “Tree” Meaning in the New Urban Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-22, March.
    8. Laté Lawson-Lartego & Lars Mathiassen, 2021. "Microfranchising to Alleviate Poverty: An Innovation Network Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 171(3), pages 545-563, July.
    9. Andreas Ch. Hadjichambis & Demetra Paraskeva-Hadjichambi & Eleni Sinakou & Anastasia Adamou & Yiannis Georgiou, 2022. "Green Cities for Environmental Citizenship: A Systematic Literature Review of Empirical Research from 31 Green Cities of the World," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-30, December.
    10. Kelli Juliane Favato & Marguit Neumann & Simone Leticia Raimundini Sanches & Manuel Castelo Branco & Daniel Ramos Nogueira, 2021. "Integrated Thinking and Reporting Process: Sensemaking of Internal Actors in the Case of Itaú Unibanco," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-16, June.
    11. Mendoza-Abarca, Karla I. & Anokhin, Sergey & Zamudio, César, 2015. "Uncovering the influence of social venture creation on commercial venture creation: A population ecology perspective," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 793-807.
    12. Michael H. Morris & Justin W. Webb & Rebecca J. Franklin, 2011. "Understanding the Manifestation of Entrepreneurial Orientation in the Nonprofit Context," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 35(5), pages 947-971, September.
    13. Giuliano Marella & Valentina Antoniucci, 2019. "Time Overrun in Public Works—Evidence from North-East Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-17, December.
    14. Geradts, Thijs H.J. & Alt, Elisa, 2022. "Social entrepreneurial action in established organizations: Developing the concept of social intrapreneurship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 197-206.
    15. Argiolas, Alessia & Rawhouser, Hans & Sydow, Alisa, 2024. "Social entrepreneurs concerned about Impact Drift. Evidence from contexts of persistent and pervasive need," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 39(1).
    16. Addisu A. Lashitew & Lydia Bals & Rob Tulder, 2020. "Inclusive Business at the Base of the Pyramid: The Role of Embeddedness for Enabling Social Innovations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 162(2), pages 421-448, March.
    17. M. Tina Dacin & Peter A. Dacin & Paul Tracey, 2011. "Social Entrepreneurship: A Critique and Future Directions," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 1203-1213, October.
    18. François Perrot, 2017. "Multinational Corporations’ Strategies at the Base of the Pyramid: An Action Research Inquiry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 146(1), pages 59-76, November.
    19. Geoffrey M. Kistruck & Justin W. Webb & Christopher J. Sutter & R. Duane Ireland, 2011. "Microfranchising in Base–of–the–Pyramid Markets: Institutional Challenges and Adaptations to the Franchise Model," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 35(3), pages 503-531, May.
    20. Chacko G. Kannothra & Stephan Manning & Nardia Haigh, 2018. "How Hybrids Manage Growth and Social–Business Tensions in Global Supply Chains: The Case of Impact Sourcing," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(2), pages 271-290, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3050-:d:1061212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.