Author
Listed:
- Qiqi Lin
(School of Qilu Transportation, Shandong University, Jinan 250002, China)
- Yuhe Zhang
(School of Qilu Transportation, Shandong University, Jinan 250002, China)
- Chenjun Yang
(Shandong Provincial Communications Planning and Design Institute Group Co., Ltd., Jinan 250000, China)
- Xiaohua Wang
(Qilu Expressway Company Limited, Jinan 250102, China)
- Tao Lei
(Qilu Expressway Company Limited, Jinan 250102, China)
- Chengwei Ju
(School of Qilu Transportation, Shandong University, Jinan 250002, China)
- Zhanyong Yao
(School of Qilu Transportation, Shandong University, Jinan 250002, China)
- Kai Yao
(School of Qilu Transportation, Shandong University, Jinan 250002, China
Suzhou Research Institute of Shandong University, Suzhou 215123, China)
Abstract
Highway widening is an important way to improve the existing expressway capacity and promote the development of transportation systems. The differential settlement between the old and new subgrade is the key factor to evaluate whether it is necessary to carry out ground improvement for the new foundation, which will cause longitudinal pavement cracking and even subgrade instability. Therefore, the most critical task in the highway expansion project is controlling differential settlement, particularly post-construction differential settlement. In this study, a fluid-structure coupling settlement analysis model was developed based on FLAC3D, and a modified Cam-clay (MCC) model was used to describe the difference between new and old foundation parameters. The working conditions of different subgrade heights and groundwater levels were simulated to analyze their influence on the differential settlement during and after construction. With the increment value of the transverse slope (Δ i ) and maximum slope ( k ) of new and old subgrade settlement curves as evaluation indexes, the differential settlement size of widened subgrade under different working conditions is evaluated, which provides a basis for the design of widened foundation engineering and provides suggestions on whether reinforcement measures should be taken. The results show that the post-construction differential settlement increases with the increase in groundwater level and subgrade height. Under the requirement of Δ i ≤ 0.5%, it is not necessary to take reinforcement measures under the condition of local water levels under a 2 m subgrade height and −9 m and −11 m groundwater levels under a 4 m subgrade height. However, when the water level rises further, or the height of the subgrade increases further, it is necessary to take foundation reinforcement measures. Meanwhile, for the requirement of k ≤ 0.5%, foundation reinforcement measures should be taken for all working conditions regardless of the water level or subgrade height. The research results can provide theoretical value and reference for foundation treatment in roadbed-widening engineering.
Suggested Citation
Qiqi Lin & Yuhe Zhang & Chenjun Yang & Xiaohua Wang & Tao Lei & Chengwei Ju & Zhanyong Yao & Kai Yao, 2023.
"Evaluation of Differential Settlement of Subgrade for Highway-Widening Projects,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-14, February.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:2950-:d:1059579
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Ning Xu & Yao-guo Dang, 2015.
"An Optimized Grey GM(2,1) Model and Forecasting of Highway Subgrade Settlement,"
Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2015, pages 1-6, January.
- Xin Wang & Xizhao Wang & Guangqing Yang & Changyu Pu & Jinzhao Jin, 2022.
"Field Test on Deformation Characteristics of Pile-Supported Reinforced Embankment in Soft Soil Foundation,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-19, June.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:2950-:d:1059579. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.