IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p2749-d1056037.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Framework of New Poverty Decomposition: An Application to the Evolution of Income Distribution

Author

Listed:
  • Xing Feng

    (School of Economics, Faculty of Economics, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110136, China)

  • Zhe Zhao

    (School of Economics, Faculty of Economics, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110136, China)

  • Zhanhua Jia

    (School of Economics, Faculty of Economics, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110136, China)

  • Zhenxing Tian

    (Jilin Academy of Social Sciences, Changchun 130033, China)

  • Haiting Chen

    (School of Economics, Faculty of Economics, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110136, China)

Abstract

Ending poverty in all its forms is the first of the 17 sustainable development goals (SDGs) of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Therefore, it is of great significance to study poverty in the context of sustainable development. At present, the effect of income growth on poverty reduction is becoming less evident, whereas the effect of inhabitant heterogeneity on poverty reduction is becoming increasingly significant in China. Based on the original two-dimensional poverty decomposition of income growth and redistribution, this study introduces the heterogeneity effect to decompose rural poverty in China from three dimensions. It first decomposes the change in income distribution into mean, variance, and residual effects using counterfactual analysis. Then, it introduces the Foster–Greer–Thorbecke index decomposition to decompose China’s rural poverty under the different poverty line. In addition, this paper employs mathematical statistics to analyze the effects of poverty’s growth, dispersion, and heterogeneity. This study finds that the three-dimensional poverty decomposition method can measure the trajectory and trend of poverty more precisely and comprehensively. Moreover, it found that the contradiction between economic growth and poverty regression is due to the fact that the poverty reduction effect of the growth effect and the poverty alleviation effect of the discrete effect have asymmetrical characteristics, whereas the discrete effect and the heterogeneous effect have symmetrical characteristics; that is, the poverty reduction effect of income growth is insufficient to compensate for the poverty deepening effect brought about by the widening income gap, and that the heterogeneous poverty reduction effect plays an increasingly important role. Therefore, to prevent residents from falling back into poverty after being lifted out of it, we must reduce the widening income gap. Moreover, residents’ ability to reduce poverty on their own must be strengthened.

Suggested Citation

  • Xing Feng & Zhe Zhao & Zhanhua Jia & Zhenxing Tian & Haiting Chen, 2023. "Framework of New Poverty Decomposition: An Application to the Evolution of Income Distribution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2749-:d:1056037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2749/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2749/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David H. Autor & Lawrence F. Katz & Melissa S. Kearney, 2005. "Rising Wage Inequality: The Role of Composition and Prices," NBER Working Papers 11628, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Foster, James & Greer, Joel & Thorbecke, Erik, 1984. "A Class of Decomposable Poverty Measures," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 52(3), pages 761-766, May.
    3. Buvinic, Mayra & Gupta, Geeta Rao, 1997. "Female-Headed Households and Female-Maintained Families: Are They Worth Targeting to Reduce Poverty in Developing Countries?," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 45(2), pages 259-280, January.
    4. Fuwa, Nobuhiko, 2000. "The Poverty and Heterogeneity Among Female-Headed Households Revisited: The Case of Panama," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 28(8), pages 1515-1542, August.
    5. Ismaila Rimi Abubakar, 2022. "Multidimensional Poverty among Nigerian Households: Sustainable Development Implications," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 164(2), pages 993-1014, November.
    6. Sen, Amartya K, 1976. "Poverty: An Ordinal Approach to Measurement," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 44(2), pages 219-231, March.
    7. Dan Brockington, 2012. "A Radically Conservative Vision? The Challenge of UNEP's Towards a Green Economy," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 43(1), pages 409-422, January.
    8. repec:bla:revinw:v:25:y:1979:i:4:p:429-39 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Thomas Lemieux, 2006. "Increasing Residual Wage Inequality: Composition Effects, Noisy Data, or Rising Demand for Skill?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 96(3), pages 461-498, June.
    10. Dominique Thon, 1979. "On Measuring Poverty," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 25(4), pages 429-439, December.
    11. repec:bla:revinw:v:46:y:2000:i:2:p:139-59 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Gary S. Fields & Gyeongjoon Yoo, 2000. "Falling Labor Income Inequality In Korea'S Economic Growth: Patterns And Underlying Causes," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 46(2), pages 139-159, June.
    13. Ravallion, M. & Datt, G., 1991. "Growth and Redistribution Components of Changes in Poverty Measures," Papers 83, World Bank - Living Standards Measurement.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francisco J. Ciocchini & Gabriel Molteni, 2008. "Medidas alternativas de la pobreza en el Gran Buenos Aires, 1995-2006," Ensayos de Política Económica, Departamento de Investigación Francisco Valsecchi, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina., vol. 1(2), pages 46-82, Octubre.
    2. Samuel Fambon, 2005. "Croissance économique, pauvreté et inégalité des revenus au Cameroun," Revue d’économie du développement, De Boeck Université, vol. 13(1), pages 91-122.
    3. Babulo, Bedru & Muys, Bart & Nega, Fredu & Tollens, Eric & Nyssen, Jan & Deckers, Jozef & Mathijs, Erik, 2009. "The economic contribution of forest resource use to rural livelihoods in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 123-131, March.
    4. Wen-Hao Chen & Jean-Yves Duclos, 2011. "Testing for poverty dominance: an application to Canada," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 44(3), pages 781-803, August.
    5. Arthur Charpentier & Stéphane Mussard, 2011. "Income inequality games," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 9(4), pages 529-554, December.
    6. ALi Abdel Gadir Ali, "undated". "Poverty in the Arab Region: A Selective Review," API-Working Paper Series 0402, Arab Planning Institute - Kuwait, Information Center.
    7. Espinoza-Delgado, José & Klasen, Stephan, 2018. "Gender and multidimensional poverty in Nicaragua: An individual based approach," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 466-491.
    8. Lars Osberg & Kuan Xu, 1999. "Poverty Intensity: How Well Do Canadian Provinces Compare?," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 25(2), pages 179-195, June.
    9. Srinivas Goli & Nagendra Kumar Maurya & Moradhvaj & Prem Bhandari, 2019. "Regional Differentials in Multidimensional Poverty in Nepal: Rethinking Dimensions and Method of Computation," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(1), pages 21582440198, March.
    10. Núñez Velázquez, José Javier, 2009. "Estado actual y nuevas aproximaciones a la medición de la pobreza/Current Status and New Approaches to the Measurement of Poverty," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 27, pages 325-346, Agosto.
    11. Zheng, Buhong, 2000. "Minimum Distribution-Sensitivity, Poverty Aversion, and Poverty Orderings," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 116-137, November.
    12. Suman Seth and Gaston Yalonetzky, 2018. "Assessing Deprivation with Ordinal Variables: Depth Sensitivity and Poverty Aversion," OPHI Working Papers ophiwp123.pdf, Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford.
    13. James E. Foster & Joel Greer & Erik Thorbecke, 2010. "The Foster-Greer-Thorbecke (FGT) Poverty Measures: Twenty-Five Years Later," Working Papers 2010-14, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
    14. Jean–Yves Duclos & Phillipe Grégoire, 2002. "Absolute and Relative Deprivation and the Measurement of Poverty," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 48(4), pages 471-492, December.
    15. Zheng, Buhong, 2001. "Statistical inference for poverty measures with relative poverty lines," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 101(2), pages 337-356, April.
    16. Chakravarty, Satya R. & D'Ambrosio, Conchita, 2013. "An axiomatic approach to the measurement of poverty reduction failure," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 874-880.
    17. Sreenivasan Subramanian, 2004. "Indicators of Inequality and Poverty," WIDER Working Paper Series RP2004-25, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    18. Fujii, Tomoki, 2017. "Dynamic Poverty Decomposition Analysis: An Application to the Philippines," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 69-84.
    19. Iryna Kyzyma, 2020. "How Poor Are the Poor? Looking beyond the Binary Measure of Income Poverty," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 18(4), pages 525-549, December.
    20. Canagarajan, Sudharshan & Ngwafon, John & Thomas, Saji, 1997. "The evolution of poverty and welfare in Nigeria, 1985-92," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1715, The World Bank.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2749-:d:1056037. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.