IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p2459-d1051301.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Indonesian Butterfly Pea ( Clitoria ternatea L.) Using Stability Analysis and Sustainability Index

Author

Listed:
  • Yoshua Liberty Filio

    (Bioresources Management, Graduate School, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung 40132, Indonesia)

  • Haris Maulana

    (Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung 45060, Indonesia)

  • Reviana Aulia

    (Bioresources Management, Graduate School, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung 40132, Indonesia)

  • Tarkus Suganda

    (Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung 45060, Indonesia)

  • Trixie Almira Ulimaz

    (Bioresources Management, Graduate School, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung 40132, Indonesia)

  • Virda Aziza

    (Directorate General of Food Crops, Ministry of Agriculture, Jakarta 12520, Indonesia)

  • Vergel Concibido

    (Sensient Colors LLC., St. Louis, MO 63106, USA)

  • Agung Karuniawan

    (Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung 45060, Indonesia)

Abstract

Yield and yield attributes are important components in genotypic evaluation. The butterfly pea is a native plant of Indonesia, and it is considered an underutilized crop. The goals of this study were to evaluate genotypes using environment (year) interactions (GEIs) with yield and yield attributes, and evaluate butterfly pea genotypes based on stability measurements and sustainability index (SI). The study was conducted at the Ciparanje Experimental Field, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Padjadjaran using 35 butterfly pea genotypes in a randomized complete block design with two replications. The field trial was conducted over three years (2018–2020). The results showed that the yield and yield attributes were influenced by GEIs. Additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) selected 11 stable genotypes (31.43%); genotype plus genotype by environment interaction (GGE) biplot, AMMI stability value (ASV), and genotype stability index (GSI), each selected six genotypes (17.14%) that were stable and high-yielding, and SI selected 18 genotypes (51.43%) that were stable and high-yielding. There were three genotypes identified by all measurements, namely G2, G14, and G16. These three genotypes can be selected as the superior genotypes of the butterfly pea for flower production, and can be used as material for crosses in plant-breeding prog.

Suggested Citation

  • Yoshua Liberty Filio & Haris Maulana & Reviana Aulia & Tarkus Suganda & Trixie Almira Ulimaz & Virda Aziza & Vergel Concibido & Agung Karuniawan, 2023. "Evaluation of Indonesian Butterfly Pea ( Clitoria ternatea L.) Using Stability Analysis and Sustainability Index," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-14, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2459-:d:1051301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2459/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2459/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xin Yang & Alaa A. Soliman & Chaoqin Hu & Feng Yang & Meiyuan Lv & Haitian Yu & Yubao Wang & Aiqing Zheng & Zhengming Dai & Qiong Li & Yongsheng Tang & Jiangu Yang & Yurong Zhang & Wenwu Niu & Liping , 2023. "Yield Adaptability and Stability in Field Pea Genotypes Using AMMI, GGE, and GYT Biplot Analyses," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-19, October.
    2. Haris Maulana & Yudithia Maxiselly & Yuyun Yuwariah & Dedi Ruswandi, 2023. "Heritability and Selection Using GGE Biplots and the Sustainability Index (SI) of Maize Mutants under Different Cropping Systems in Upland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-22, April.
    3. Dwinita Wikan Utami & Ajang Maruapey & Haris Maulana & Parlin Halomon Sinaga & Susilawati Basith & Agung Karuniawan, 2023. "The Sustainability Index and Other Stability Analyses for Evaluating Superior Fe-Tolerant Rice ( Oryza sativa L.)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-22, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2459-:d:1051301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.