IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p2178-d1045565.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Phytoremediation Potential of Sorghum as a Bioenergy Crop in Pb-Amendment Soil

Author

Listed:
  • Hanan E. Osman

    (Department of Biology, Faculty of Applied Science, Umm Al-Qura University, Mecca 24382, Saudi Arabia
    Botany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Al-Azhar University, Cairo 11435, Egypt)

  • Ruwaydah S. Fadhlallah

    (Department of Biology, Faculty of Applied Science, Umm Al-Qura University, Mecca 24382, Saudi Arabia)

  • Wael M. Alamoudi

    (Department of Biology, Faculty of Applied Science, Umm Al-Qura University, Mecca 24382, Saudi Arabia)

  • Ebrahem M. Eid

    (Biology Department, College of Science, King Khalid University, Abha 61321, Saudi Arabia
    Botany Department, Faculty of Science, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafr El-Sheikh 33516, Egypt)

  • Ahmed A. Abdelhafez

    (Department of Soils and Water, Faculty of Agriculture, New Valley University, Kharga Oasis 72511, Egypt
    National Committee of Soil Science, Academy of Scientific Research and Technology, Cairo 11694, Egypt)

Abstract

Lead contamination is among the most significant threats to the environment. The phytoextraction approach uses plants that can tolerate and accumulate metals in their tissues. Lately, biofuel plants have been recommended to be suitable for remediation and implementation of potentially toxic elements (PTEs)-polluted soil. This research assessed the Pb phytoremediation potential of three Sorghum bicolor [red cultivar (S1), white cultivar (S2) and shahla cultivar (S3)]. A pot experiment with five treatments (0, 100, 200, 400 and 800 mg Pb/kg soil) was carried out to assess the potential possibility of using these cultivars to remediate the soil of Pb. The potential possibility of using these plants to phytoremediate the soil of Pb was also assessed. The results emphasized that all the examined cultivars could attain growth to maturity in high Pb spiked soil. However, Pb influenced morphological and chlorophyll contents, especially in plants grown in soil amended with 800 mg/kg. The S1 cultivar had the most significant reduction in total chlorophyll with an average of 72%, followed by the S2 and S3 cultivars (65% and 58% reduction, respectively). The highest Pb content in root (110.0, 177.6 and 198.9 mg/kg, respectively) and in-plant shoot (83.9, 103.6 and 99.0 mg/kg, respectively) were detected by sorghum (S1, S2 and S3, respectively) grown in soil enriched by 800 mg/kg of Pb. From the calculated results of the contamination indices, contamination factor (CF), translocation factor (TF), plant uptake (UT) and tolerance index (TI), none of the investigated cultivars were considered Pb hyperaccumulators, but all were identified as particularly ideal for phytostabilization.

Suggested Citation

  • Hanan E. Osman & Ruwaydah S. Fadhlallah & Wael M. Alamoudi & Ebrahem M. Eid & Ahmed A. Abdelhafez, 2023. "Phytoremediation Potential of Sorghum as a Bioenergy Crop in Pb-Amendment Soil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-16, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2178-:d:1045565
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2178/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2178/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adriana Mihaela Chirilă Băbău & Valer Micle & Gianina Elena Damian & Ioana Monica Sur, 2021. "Sustainable Ecological Restoration of Sterile Dumps Using Robinia pseudoacacia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-15, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daolong Xu & Xiufen Li & Jian Chen & Jianghua Li, 2023. "Research Progress of Soil and Vegetation Restoration Technology in Open-Pit Coal Mine: A Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2178-:d:1045565. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.