IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p2118-d1044362.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Air Quality Evolution Trends in the Chinese Air Pollution Transmission Channel Cities under Socioeconomic Development Scenarios

Author

Listed:
  • Kaihe Shi

    (School of Management, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin 300384, China)

  • Huiru Liu

    (School of Management, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin 300384, China)

  • Li Zhang

    (School of Management, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin 300384, China)

  • Qing Li

    (School of Management, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin 300384, China)

Abstract

In this paper, based on the traditional grey multivariate convolutional model, the concept of a buffer operator is introduced to construct a single-indicator buffered grey multivariate convolutional model applicable to air quality prediction research. The construction steps of the model are described in detail in this paper, and the stability of the model is analyzed based on perturbation theory. Furthermore, the model was applied to predict the air quality composite index of the “2 + 26” Chinese air pollution transmission corridor cities based on different socioeconomic development scenarios in a multidimensional manner. The results show that the single-indicator buffered grey multivariate convolutional model constructed in this paper has better stability in predicting with a small amount of sample data. From 2020 to 2025, the air quality of the target cities selected in this paper follows an improving trend. The population density, secondary industry, and urbanization will not have a significant negative impact on the improvement of air quality if they are kept stable. In the case of steady development of secondary industry, air quality maintained a stable improvement in 96.4% of the “2 + 26” cities. The growth rate of population density will have an inverted U-shaped relationship with the decline in the city air quality composite index. In addition, with the steady development of urbanization, air quality would keep improving steadily in 71.4% of the “2 + 26” cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaihe Shi & Huiru Liu & Li Zhang & Qing Li, 2023. "Analysis of Air Quality Evolution Trends in the Chinese Air Pollution Transmission Channel Cities under Socioeconomic Development Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-16, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2118-:d:1044362
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2118/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2118/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cheng, Zhonghua & Wang, Lan, 2023. "Can new urbanization improve urban total-factor energy efficiency in China?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    2. Khan, Irfan & Hou, Fujun & Le, Hoang Phong & Ali, Syed Ahtsham, 2021. "Do natural resources, urbanization, and value-adding manufacturing affect environmental quality? Evidence from the top ten manufacturing countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    3. Lanzi, Elisa & Dellink, Rob & Chateau, Jean, 2018. "The sectoral and regional economic consequences of outdoor air pollution to 2060," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 89-113.
    4. Ahmed, Zahoor & Asghar, Muhammad Mansoor & Malik, Muhammad Nasir & Nawaz, Kishwar, 2020. "Moving towards a sustainable environment: The dynamic linkage between natural resources, human capital, urbanization, economic growth, and ecological footprint in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    5. Borck, Rainald & Schrauth, Philipp, 2021. "Population density and urban air quality," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    6. Zahoor Ahmed & Muhammad Mansoor Asghar & Muhammad Nasir Malik & Kishwar Nawaz, 2020. "Moving towards a sustainable environment: The dynamic linkage between natural resources, human capital, urbanization, economic growth, and ecological footprint in China," Post-Print hal-03557938, HAL.
    7. Su, Min & Wang, Qiang & Li, Rongrong & Wang, Lili, 2022. "Per capita renewable energy consumption in 116 countries: The effects of urbanization, industrialization, GDP, aging, and trade openness," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PB).
    8. Ofosu-Adarkwa, Jeffrey & Xie, Naiming & Javed, Saad Ahmed, 2020. "Forecasting CO2 emissions of China's cement industry using a hybrid Verhulst-GM(1,N) model and emissions' technical conversion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Malayaranjan Sahoo & Narayan Sethi, 2022. "The dynamic impact of urbanization, structural transformation, and technological innovation on ecological footprint and PM2.5: evidence from newly industrialized countries," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 4244-4277, March.
    2. Yugang He, 2022. "Renewable and Non-Renewable Energy Consumption and Trade Policy: Do They Matter for Environmental Sustainability?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Liu, Haiying & Saleem, Muhammad Mansoor & Al-Faryan, Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh & Khan, Irfan & Zafar, Muhammad Wasif, 2022. "Impact of governance and globalization on natural resources volatility: The role of financial development in the Middle East North Africa countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    4. Wu, Guoyong & Gao, Yue & Feng, Yanchao, 2023. "Assessing the environmental effects of the supporting policies for mineral resource-exhausted cities in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    5. Hossain, Mohammad Razib & Rej, Soumen & Awan, Ashar & Bandyopadhyay, Arunava & Islam, Md Sayemul & Das, Narasingha & Hossain, Md Emran, 2023. "Natural resource dependency and environmental sustainability under N-shaped EKC: The curious case of India," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    6. Sufyanullah, Khan & Ahmad, Khan Arshad & Sufyan Ali, Muhammad Abu, 2022. "Does emission of carbon dioxide is impacted by urbanization? An empirical study of urbanization, energy consumption, economic growth and carbon emissions - Using ARDL bound testing approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    7. Wang, Shuang & Yang, Lihong, 2024. "Mineral resource extraction and resource sustainability: Policy initiatives for agriculture, economy, energy, and the environment," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    8. Mahmood, Ahmad & Zahoor, Ahmed & Xiyue, Yang & Nazim, Hussain & Sinha, Avik, 2021. "Financial development and environmental degradation: Do human capital and institutional quality make a difference?," MPRA Paper 110039, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2021.
    9. Naqvi, Syed Asif Ali & Hussain, Mehvish & Hussain, Bilal & Shah, Syed Ale Raza & Nazir, Jawad & Usman, Muhammad, 2023. "Environmental sustainability and biomass energy consumption through the lens of pollution Haven hypothesis and renewable energy-environmental kuznets curve," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 621-631.
    10. Ahmad, Fayyaz & Draz, Muhammad Umar & Chandio, Abbas Ali & Ahmad, Munir & Su, Lijuan & Shahzad, Farrukh & Jia, Mingqi, 2022. "Natural resources and environmental quality: Exploring the regional variations among Chinese provinces with a novel approach," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    11. Saud, Shah & Haseeb, Abdul & Haider Zaidi, Syed Anees & Khan, Irfan & Li, Huiyun, 2024. "Moving towards green growth? Harnessing natural resources and economic complexity for sustainable development through the lens of the N-shaped EKC framework for the European Union," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    12. Alfalih, Abdulaziz Abdulmohsen & Hadj, Tarek Bel, 2022. "Financialization, natural resources rents and environmental sustainability dynamics in Saudi Arabia under high and low regimes," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    13. Zhao, Yunying & Wang, Wenju & Liang, Zhentang & Luo, Peng, 2024. "Racing towards zero carbon: Unraveling the interplay between natural resource rents, green innovation, geopolitical risk and environmental pollution in BRICS countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    14. Ahmad, Mahmood & Pata, Ugur Korkut & Ahmed, Zahoor & Zhao, Ruiqi, 2024. "Fintech, natural resources management, green energy transition, and ecological footprint: Empirical insights from EU countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    15. Flores, Bryan & Alvarado, Rafael, 2022. "Influencia de la Renta de Recursos Naturales y la Inversión Extranjera en la Degradación Ambiental de Ecuador [Influence of the Rent of Natural Resources and Foreign Investment in the Environmental," MPRA Paper 113736, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Emrah Kocak & Hayriye Hilal Baglitas, 2022. "The path to sustainable municipal solid waste management: Do human development, energy efficiency, and income inequality matter?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1947-1962, December.
    17. Sun, Yunpeng & Tian, Wenjuan & Mehmood, Usman & Zhang, Xiaoyu & Tariq, Salman, 2023. "How do natural resources, urbanization, and institutional quality meet with ecological footprints in the presence of income inequality and human capital in the next eleven countries?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    18. Miao, Yang & Razzaq, Asif & Adebayo, Tomiwa Sunday & Awosusi, Abraham Ayobamiji, 2022. "Do renewable energy consumption and financial globalisation contribute to ecological sustainability in newly industrialized countries?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 688-697.
    19. Yung-Jaan Lee, 2022. "Hybrid Ecological Footprint of Taipei," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, April.
    20. Lee, Chien-Chiang & Qian, Anqi, 2024. "Regional differences, dynamic evolution, and obstacle factors of cultivated land ecological security in China," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2118-:d:1044362. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.