IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p1785-d1038839.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Alternative Rural Housing Management Tool Empowered by a Bayesian Neural Classifier

Author

Listed:
  • Mingzhi Song

    (School of Civil and Ocean Engineering, Jiangsu Ocean University, Lianyungang 222000, China)

  • Zheng Zhu

    (School of Civil and Ocean Engineering, Jiangsu Ocean University, Lianyungang 222000, China)

  • Peipei Wang

    (School of Civil and Ocean Engineering, Jiangsu Ocean University, Lianyungang 222000, China)

  • Kun Wang

    (School of Mechanical Aerospace and Civil Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK)

  • Zhenqi Li

    (School of Civil and Ocean Engineering, Jiangsu Ocean University, Lianyungang 222000, China)

  • Cun Feng

    (School of Civil and Ocean Engineering, Jiangsu Ocean University, Lianyungang 222000, China)

  • Ming Shan

    (School of Civil and Ocean Engineering, Jiangsu Ocean University, Lianyungang 222000, China)

Abstract

In developing countries, decision-making regarding old rural houses significantly relies on expert site investigations, which are criticized for being resource-demanding. This paper aims to construct an efficient Bayesian classifier for house safety and habitability risk evaluations, enabling people with none-civil-engineering backgrounds to make judgements comparable with experts so that house risk levels can be checked regularly at low costs. An initial list of critical risk factors for house safety and habitability was identified with a literature review and verified by expert discussions, field surveys, and Pearson’s Chi-square test of independence with 864 questionnaire samples. The model was constructed according to the causal mechanism between the verified factors and quantified using Bayesian belief network parameter learning. The model reached relatively high accuracy rates, ranging from 91.3% to 100.0% under different situations, including crosschecks with unused expert judgement samples with full input data, crosschecks with unused expert judgement samples with missing input data, and those involving local residents’ judgement. Model sensitivity analyses revealed walls; purlins and roof trusses; and foundations as the three most critical factors for safety and insulation and waterproofing; water and electricity; and fire safety for habitability. The identified list of critical factors contributes to the rural house evaluation and management strategies for developing countries. In addition, the established Bayesian classifier enables regular house checks on a regular and economical basis.

Suggested Citation

  • Mingzhi Song & Zheng Zhu & Peipei Wang & Kun Wang & Zhenqi Li & Cun Feng & Ming Shan, 2023. "An Alternative Rural Housing Management Tool Empowered by a Bayesian Neural Classifier," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:1785-:d:1038839
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/1785/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/1785/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiaojiao Xu & Chuanjie Yan & Yangyang Su & Yong Liu, 2020. "Analysis of high-rise building safety detection methods based on big data and artificial intelligence," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 16(6), pages 15501477209, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:1785-:d:1038839. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.