IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i2p1674-d1036561.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

210 Po in the Environment: Reassessment of Dose to Humans

Author

Listed:
  • Saif Uddin

    (Environment Pollution and Climate Program, Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research, Safat 13109, Kuwait)

  • Scott W. Fowler

    (School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794-5000, USA
    Present address: Institute Bobby, 8 Allée des Orangers, 06320 Cap d’Ail, France.)

  • Montaha Behbehani

    (Environment Pollution and Climate Program, Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research, Safat 13109, Kuwait)

Abstract

Significant efforts have been made by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) to establish a reliable basis of equivalent and effective doses due to radionuclides. The ICRP over years has been updating the dose coefficients to include recent developments and make it more realistic. This perspective highlights some issues that warrant updating the methodology used for estimating 210 Po dose to humans. The need to underpin these dose coefficients with ever-increasing literature has encouraged us to share the observation on the significant loss of 210 Po due to seafood cooking, considering the loss due to cooking warrants changing the factor for the dose from seafood ingestion. Most dose assessment approaches use whole-body concentration, while most 210 Po is present in the liver and digestive system that often are not part of the edible portion. The other factor is the extremely high 210 Po concentration in aerosols as a result of coal and oil-fired power plants, forest fires, and volcanic activities, especially in the inhalable fraction. The 210 Po/ 210 Pb concentration ratio in the Gulf was observed to be between 1.6 and 1.9 in contrast to the 0.1 ratio observed in non-impacted areas. This reassessment of the inhalation dose is also relevant globally due to increasing incidences of forest fires where a much higher than 0.1 210 Po/ 210 Pb ratio is expected and will result in a significant inhalation dose.

Suggested Citation

  • Saif Uddin & Scott W. Fowler & Montaha Behbehani, 2023. "210 Po in the Environment: Reassessment of Dose to Humans," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-9, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:1674-:d:1036561
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/2/1674/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/2/1674/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Montaha Behbehani & Fernando Piedade Carvalho & Saif Uddin & Nazima Habibi, 2021. "Enhanced Polonium Concentrations in Aerosols from the Gulf Oil Producing Region and the Role of Microorganisms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-20, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nazima Habibi & Saif Uddin & Montaha Behbehani & Abu Salim Mustafa & Wadha Al-Fouzan & Hanan A. Al-Sarawi & Hussain Safar & Fatemah Alatar & Rima M. Z. Al Sawan, 2024. "Aerosol-Mediated Spread of Antibiotic Resistance Genes: Biomonitoring Indoor and Outdoor Environments," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(8), pages 1-18, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    inhalation; ingestion; 210 Pb; ICRP;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:1674-:d:1036561. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.