IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i24p16924-d1302004.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Efficiency of Resource Utilization in EU-28 Countries through Eco-Innovation and Digital Inclusion

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandra-Maria Constantin

    (Department of Economic Informatics and Cybernetics, Faculty of Economic Cybernetics, Statistics and Informatics, Bucharest University of Economics Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Orlando-Marian Voica

    (Department of Economic Informatics and Cybernetics, Faculty of Economic Cybernetics, Statistics and Informatics, Bucharest University of Economics Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Cătălin-Ionuț Silvestru

    (Robots and Production System Department, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 060041 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Vasilica-Cristina Icociu

    (Robots and Production System Department, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 060041 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Ramona-Camelia Silvestru

    (Metallic Constructions, Management and Graphic Engineering Department, Technical University of Civil Engineering Bucharest, 020396 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Andreea Grecu

    (Metallic Constructions, Management and Graphic Engineering Department, Technical University of Civil Engineering Bucharest, 020396 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

Innovation has been a historical driver for progress. The need for more effective resource utilization has ignited the presence of many innovations in the economic environment. Among others, digitalization and internet connectivity are important pillars of development. Our paper aims to provide a few insights related to the question “How can we increase the efficiency of resource utilization in EU-28 countries through Eco-Innovation and Digital Inclusion?” This paper examines the issue of innovation related to the use of natural resources (Eco-innovation) as a determining factor in resource consumption in societies with different levels of digital inclusion. Our analysis is based on clustering of EU-28 Member States using three variables: the degree of digital inclusion, the Eco-Innovation Index, and the degree of resource use. We expect digital inclusion to mediate the relationship between eco-innovation and resource utilization. Clustering might reveal how the Eco-Innovation Index, Digital Inclusion Level, and Resource Productivity Index differ among EU-28 Member States and provide relevant information for prioritization of resource allocation at the EU level. Our approach of clustering based on the three variables considered reveals that countries with a better economy present better performance from the point of view of Digital Inclusion in the context of Eco-Innovation and the use of resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandra-Maria Constantin & Orlando-Marian Voica & Cătălin-Ionuț Silvestru & Vasilica-Cristina Icociu & Ramona-Camelia Silvestru & Andreea Grecu, 2023. "The Efficiency of Resource Utilization in EU-28 Countries through Eco-Innovation and Digital Inclusion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:24:p:16924-:d:1302004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/24/16924/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/24/16924/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Claudia Kemfert, 2019. "Green Deal for Europe: More Climate Protection and Fewer Fossil Fuel Wars," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 54(6), pages 353-358, November.
    2. Guanyu Li & Dian Li & Tang Tang, 2023. "Bibliometric Review of Design for Digital Inclusion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-16, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Simona Breidokaite & Gediminas Stankunas, 2021. "Activities in Divertor Reflector and Linear Plates Using WCLL and HCPB Breeding Blanket Concepts," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Teresa Pakulska, 2021. "Green Energy in Central and Eastern European (CEE) Countries: New Challenges on the Path to Sustainable Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-19, February.
    3. Battaglini, Fabian, 2024. "Will the European Green Deal enhance Europe’s security towards Russia? A political economy perspective," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    4. Baoyi Zhang, 2024. "Research progress and intellectual structure of design for digital equity (DDE): A bibliometric analysis based on citespace," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    5. Richard S. J. Tol, 2023. "Navigating the energy trilemma during geopolitical and environmental crises," Papers 2301.07671, arXiv.org.
    6. Pan, Changchun & Yu, Jingxia & Huang, Yuzhe & Altuntas, Sumeyya, 2023. "The dynamic relationship between resources, finances, and sustainable development: An in-depth analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PB).
    7. Offermann-van Heek, Julia & Arning, Katrin & Sternberg, André & Bardow, André & Ziefle, Martina, 2020. "Assessing public acceptance of the life cycle of CO2-based fuels: Does information make the difference?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    8. Laura Castro-Santos & Maite deCastro & Xurxo Costoya & Almudena Filgueira-Vizoso & Isabel Lamas-Galdo & Americo Ribeiro & João M. Dias & Moncho Gómez-Gesteira, 2021. "Economic Feasibility of Floating Offshore Wind Farms Considering Near Future Wind Resources: Case Study of Iberian Coast and Bay of Biscay," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-16, March.
    9. Kateryna Yakovenko & Matúš Mišík, 2020. "Cooperation and Security: Examining the Political Discourse on Natural Gas Transit in Ukraine and Slovakia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-14, November.
    10. Marinus Ossewaarde & Roshnee Ossewaarde-Lowtoo, 2020. "The EU’s Green Deal: A Third Alternative to Green Growth and Degrowth?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-15, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:24:p:16924-:d:1302004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.