IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i24p16706-d1297231.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Village Government’s Risk Management and Village Fund Administration in Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Arwanto Harimas Ginting

    (Graduate Program in Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Padjadjaran University, l. Bukit Dago Utara No. 35, Bandung 40135, Indonesia
    Institute of Home Affairs Governance, Jl. Ir. Soekarno Km. 20 Jatinangor, Sumedang 43563, Indonesia)

  • Ida Widianingsih

    (Graduate Program in Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Padjadjaran University, l. Bukit Dago Utara No. 35, Bandung 40135, Indonesia
    Center for Decentralization and Participatory Development Research, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Padjadjaran University, Jl. Bukit Dago Utara No. 35, Bandung 40135, Indonesia)

  • Rahman Mulyawan

    (Graduate Program in Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Padjadjaran University, l. Bukit Dago Utara No. 35, Bandung 40135, Indonesia)

  • Heru Nurasa

    (Graduate Program in Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Padjadjaran University, l. Bukit Dago Utara No. 35, Bandung 40135, Indonesia)

Abstract

This study examines the application of risk management in managing village funds, motivated by the village government’s efforts to improve financial management. This research focuses on activities involved in village fund management, including planning, budgeting, administration, reporting, accountability, and supervision. This study analyzes how village governments carry out risk management by considering efficiencies, innovation in public resource management, and anticipating and prioritizing potential threats and opportunities. Data collection involved participant observation, interviews, and analysis of written documents, images, and archives. The result shows that risk management is essential for the management of village funds, and avoiding mistakes in rural communities should be part of their planning and participation. This study highlights the importance of adequate human resources, both in regard to quantity and quality, but it is necessary to pay attention to local strengths by utilizing the nature of cooperation and family skills. Overall, the study emphasizes the need to prioritize risk management in managing village funds to encourage accountability and the efficient use of resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Arwanto Harimas Ginting & Ida Widianingsih & Rahman Mulyawan & Heru Nurasa, 2023. "Village Government’s Risk Management and Village Fund Administration in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-17, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:24:p:16706-:d:1297231
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/24/16706/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/24/16706/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pat Barrett AO, 2014. "New development: Risk management-how to regain trust and confidence in government," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(6), pages 459-464, November.
    2. Andreas Klinke & Ortwin Renn, 2012. "Adaptive and integrative governance on risk and uncertainty," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 273-292, March.
    3. repec:eme:mfppss:03074350310768797 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Nasrun Annahar & Ida Widianingsih & Entang Adhy Muhtar & Caroline Paskarina, 2023. "The Road to Inclusive Decentralized Village Governance in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-23, May.
    5. Peter M. Jackson, 2013. "Debate: Fraud risk management in the public sector," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(1), pages 6-8, January.
    6. Alessandro Hinna & Danila Scarozza & Fabrizio Rotundi, 2018. "Implementing Risk Management in the Italian Public Sector: Hybridization between Old and New Practices," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(2), pages 110-128, January.
    7. Will, Meike & Groeneveld, Jürgen & Lenel, Friederike & Frank, Karin & Müller, Birgit, 2023. "Determinants of Household Vulnerability in Networks with Formal Insurance and Informal Risk-Sharing," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    8. Fraser, John R.S. & Simkins, Betty J., 2016. "The challenges of and solutions for implementing enterprise risk management," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 59(6), pages 689-698.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aven, Terje & Renn, Ortwin, 2018. "Improving government policy on risk: Eight key principles," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 230-241.
    2. José Ruiz-Canela López, 2021. "How Can Enterprise Risk Management Help in Evaluating the Operational Risks for a Telecommunications Company?," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-26, March.
    3. Schweizer, Pia-Johanna & Bovet, Jana, 2016. "The potential of public participation to facilitate infrastructure decision-making: Lessons from the German and European legal planning system for electricity grid expansion," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 64-73.
    4. Ortwin Renn & Andreas Klinke, 2013. "A Framework of Adaptive Risk Governance for Urban Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(5), pages 1-24, May.
    5. Benjamin D. Trump & Christy Foran & Taylor Rycroft & Matthew D. Wood & Nirzwan Bandolin & Mariana Cains & Timothy Cary & Fiona Crocker & Nicholas A. Friedenberg & Patrick Gurian & Kerry Hamilton & Jan, 2018. "Development of community of practice to support quantitative risk assessment for synthetic biology products: contaminant bioremediation and invasive carp control as cases," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 38(4), pages 517-527, December.
    6. Pieter van Gelder & Pim Klaassen & Behnam Taebi & Bart Walhout & Ruud van Ommen & Ibo van de Poel & Zoe Robaey & Lotte Asveld & Ruud Balkenende & Frank Hollmann & Erik Jan van Kampen & Nima Khakzad & , 2021. "Safe-by-Design in Engineering: An Overview and Comparative Analysis of Engineering Disciplines," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-28, June.
    7. Jonek-Kowalska, Izabela & Nawrocki, Tomasz L., 2019. "Holistic fuzzy evaluation of operational risk in polish mining enterprises in a long-term and sectoral research perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-1.
    8. Caraiman Adrian-Cosmin & Mates Dorel, 2020. "Risk management in corporate governance," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 182-201, July.
    9. Xiaoteng Ma & Ziyu Tang & Dan Wang & Hao Gao, 2020. "The Influence of Risk Culture on the Performance of International Joint-Venture Securities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-21, March.
    10. Gerda Zigiene & Egidijus Rybakovas & Rimgaile Vaitkiene, 2020. "Challenges in Applying Artificial Intelligence for Supply Chain Risk Management," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(4), pages 299-318.
    11. Carmen Nadia Ciocoiu & Adina Liliana Prioteasa & Sofia Elena Colesca, 2020. "Risk Management Implementation for Sustainable Development of Romanian SMEs: A Fuzzy Approach ...........," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 22(55), pages 726-726, August.
    12. Yanwei Li & Araz Taeihagh & Martin de Jong & Andreas Klinke, 2021. "Toward a Commonly Shared Public Policy Perspective for Analyzing Risk Coping Strategies," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(3), pages 519-532, March.
    13. Ena Pecina & Danijela Miloš Sprčić & Ivana Dvorski Lacković, 2022. "Qualitative Analysis of Enterprise Risk Management Systems in the Largest European Electric Power Companies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-19, July.
    14. Vasco Barroso Gonçalves, 2020. "Uncertain Risk Assessment and Management: Case Studies of the Application of the Precautionary Principle in Portugal," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(5), pages 939-956, May.
    15. John Fraser & Rob Quail & Betty Simkins, 2021. "The History of Enterprise Risk Management at Hydro One Inc," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-13, August.
    16. Adina-Liliana PRIOTEASA & Carmen Nadia CIOCOIU, 2017. "Challenges In Implementing Risk Management: A Review Of The Literature," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 11(1), pages 972-980, November.
    17. Juliana Aurora de Oliveira Lopes & Léo Heller, 2020. "Explanatory Matrices on the Causes of a Tailing Dam Collapse in Brazil: The (Dis)Articulation of Epistemes," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(12), pages 2524-2538, December.
    18. Andreas Klinke & Ortwin Renn, 2021. "The Coming of Age of Risk Governance," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(3), pages 544-557, March.
    19. R. G. van der Vegt, 2018. "Risk Assessment and Risk Governance of Liquefied Natural Gas Development in Gladstone, Australia," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(9), pages 1830-1846, September.
    20. Abby Muricho Onencan & Lian Ena Liu & Bartel Van de Walle, 2020. "Design for Societal Resilience: The Risk Evaluation Diversity-Aiding Approach (RED-A)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-28, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:24:p:16706-:d:1297231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.