IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i23p16544-d1293876.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pricing Decisions for Power Battery Closed-Loop Supply Chains with Low-Carbon Input by Echelon Utilization Enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Nan Xu

    (School of Management, Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin 150028, China
    College of Information and Electrical Engineering, Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, Daqing 163319, China)

  • Yaoqun Xu

    (Institute of System Engineering, Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin 150028, China)

  • Haiyan Zhong

    (School of Management, Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin 150028, China)

Abstract

Today, with the number of waste power batteries and consumers’ awareness of low-carbon both increasing, a new closed-loop supply chain model in which the node enterprises of reverse supply chains are being constructed. These are responsible for the recycling, echelon utilization and low-carbon innovation of waste power batteries. This provides a new way for the development of reverse supply chain node enterprises and lays a theoretical foundation. In this paper, we use the backward solution method to solve the Nash equilibrium solution of the Stackelberg game. Through numerical calculation and simulation, the decision variables, profit and income of the supply chain are analyzed and the equilibrium results are compared. The experimental results indicate that the implementation of low-carbon innovative production by cascaded utilization enterprises is conducive to the growth of their profits with lower cost inputs. The impact of the initial waste power battery recycling rate on the decision variables is negative, while, for the supply chain as a whole, the profit growth of the node companies can be positive and the location of the inflection point appears to be particularly important. The sensitivity coefficient of low-carbonization levels has a positive regulatory effect on decision variables and location of all parties. The closed-loop supply chain model proposed in this study promotes the overall development of a power battery closed-loop supply chain, and also provides theoretical guidance for reasonable pricing decisions of node enterprises under the new model. Based on the results of this paper, the government can implement incentives such as subsidies, or formulate reasonable policies for the development of a power battery closed-loop supply chain.

Suggested Citation

  • Nan Xu & Yaoqun Xu & Haiyan Zhong, 2023. "Pricing Decisions for Power Battery Closed-Loop Supply Chains with Low-Carbon Input by Echelon Utilization Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-30, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:23:p:16544-:d:1293876
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/23/16544/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/23/16544/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cai, Jianhu & Jiang, Feiying, 2023. "Decision models of pricing and carbon emission reduction for low-carbon supply chain under cap-and-trade regulation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    2. Zhiyong Chang & Yunmeng Jiao & Xiaojing Wang, 2023. "Influencing the Variable Selection and Prediction of Carbon Emissions in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-15, September.
    3. Xing, Yijun & Liu, Yipeng, 2023. "Integrating product-service innovation into green supply chain management from a life cycle perspective: A systematic review and future research directions," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    4. Gang Li & Mengyu Lu & Sen Lai & Yonghong Li, 2023. "Research on Power Battery Recycling in the Green Closed-Loop Supply Chain: An Evolutionary Game-Theoretic Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-18, July.
    5. Zheng, Xiao-Xue & Li, Deng-Feng, 2023. "A new biform game-based investment incentive mechanism for eco-efficient innovation in supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    6. Chang Liu & Ying Ji & Xinqi Li, 2023. "Closed-Loop Supply Chain Network Design with Flexible Capacity under Uncertain Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-38, October.
    7. Manyi Tan & Fei Pei & Li He & Hong Cheng & Shupeng Huang, 2023. "Optimal Decision-Making of Closed-Loop Supply Chains in E-Commerce Platform Considering Sales Cooperations under Environmental Effects and WEEE Regulations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(9), pages 1-28, May.
    8. Xuan Zhao & Benhong Peng & Chaoyu Zheng & Anxia Wan, 2022. "Closed-loop supply chain pricing strategy for electric vehicle batteries recycling in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 7725-7752, June.
    9. Amir Hossein Sheikh Azadi & Vahid Shamsi Nesary & Omid Kebriyaii & Mohammad Khalilzadeh & Jurgita Antucheviciene, 2023. "Design of a Green Supply Chain Based on the Kano Model Considering Pricing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-20, August.
    10. Yan Shen & Tian Gao & Zizhao Song & Ji Ma, 2023. "Closed-Loop Supply Chain Decision-Making and Coordination Considering Fairness Concerns under Carbon Neutral Rewards and Punishments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-25, April.
    11. Askar, S.S., 2018. "Tripoly Stackelberg game model: One leader versus two followers," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 328(C), pages 301-311.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Long, Jianjun & Wang, Fenglian, 2024. "Complexity of a two-stage R&D game within a cluster supply chain considering vertical R&D spillovers, effective information, and government subsidies," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 606-621.
    2. S. S. Askar & A. Al-khedhairi, 2019. "Analysis of a Four-Firm Competition Based on a Generalized Bounded Rationality and Different Mechanisms," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-12, May.
    3. Xia, Jing & Zheng, Yan & Yang, Lehe & Xiao, Yujie, 2024. "Government intervention in green technology innovation: The carrot, the stick or both?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    4. Qingyu Zhang & Aman Ullah & Sana Ashraf & Muhammad Abdullah, 2024. "Synergistic Impact of Internet of Things and Big-Data-Driven Supply Chain on Sustainable Firm Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-20, July.
    5. Liuwei, Zhao & Shuai, Jin & Hongyun, Jiang, 2024. "Complex dynamics of dual oligopoly demand uncertainty under carbon emission trading mechanism," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    6. Sameh S. Askar, 2020. "The Influences of Asymmetric Market Information on the Dynamics of Duopoly Game," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-12, July.
    7. Jia, Fu & Zhang, Shiyuan & Zheng, Xiao-Xue & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2023. "A novel coordination mechanism to coordinate the multi-agent reverse supply chain with fairness concerns," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    8. Boyi Zhang & Shaojian Qu, 2023. "Green Supply Chain Game: Decision-Making and Coordination Mechanism Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-25, November.
    9. Sameh Askar, 2021. "Complex Investigations of a Piecewise-Smooth Remanufacturing Bertrand Duopoly Game," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(20), pages 1-13, October.
    10. Sameh Askar & Abdulaziz Foul & Tarek Mahrous & Saleh Djemele & Emad Ibrahim, 2021. "Global and Local Analysis for a Cournot Duopoly Game with Two Different Objective Functions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(23), pages 1-14, December.
    11. Huixin Liu & Xiang Hao, 2024. "Electric Vehicle Supply Chain Risk Assessment Based on Combined Weights and an Improved Matter-Element Extension Model: The Chinese Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-18, May.
    12. Askar, S.S. & Al-khedhairi, A., 2020. "On complex dynamic investigations of a piecewise smooth nonlinear duopoly game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    13. Rongjiang Cai & Tao Zhang & Xi Wang & Qiaoran Jia & Shufang Zhao & Nana Liu & Xiaoguang Wang, 2024. "Evolutionary Game and Simulation Analysis of New-Energy Vehicle Promotion in China Based on Reward and Punishment Mechanisms," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-24, September.
    14. Askar, S.S., 2022. "On the dynamics of Cournot duopoly game with private firms: Investigations and analysis," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 432(C).
    15. Xiangqian Li & Keke Li & Yaxin Tian & Siqi Shen & Yue Yu & Liwei Jin & Pengyu Meng & Jingjing Cao & Xiaoxiao Zhang, 2024. "Decision Support for Carbon Emission Reduction Strategies in China’s Cement Industry: Prediction and Identification of Influencing Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-17, June.
    16. Xiaoxuan Sun & Guangcheng Ma, 2024. "Research on Carbon Cap Regulation, Retailer Altruistic Preferences, and Green Decision-Making of Manufacturing Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-23, September.
    17. Fang Wu & Junhai Ma, 2023. "Research Trend, Logical Structure and Outlook on Complex Economic Game," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-16, February.
    18. Irina Georgescu & Ionuț Nica & Camelia Delcea & Cristian Ciurea & Nora Chiriță, 2024. "A Cybernetics Approach and Autoregressive Distributed Lag Econometric Exploration of Romania’s Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-26, September.
    19. Xia Yang & Hui Yang & Hongfu Huang & Kui Song, 2024. "Evolution of Tax Exemption Policy and Pricing Strategy Selection in a Competitive Market," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-28, July.
    20. Fei Zeng & Zhiping Lu & Chengyu Lu, 2024. "Power Battery Recycling Model of Closed-Loop Supply Chains Considering Different Power Structures Under Government Subsidies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-26, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:23:p:16544-:d:1293876. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.