IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i23p16477-d1292288.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Web-Based Decision Support System for Project Evaluation with Sustainable Development Considerations Based on Two Developed Pythagorean Fuzzy Decision Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Asad Mahmoudian Azar Sharabiani

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Shahed University, Tehran 3319118651, Iran)

  • Seyed Meysam Mousavi

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Shahed University, Tehran 3319118651, Iran)

Abstract

Decision support systems are being developed as attractive tools to help organizations make better decisions. These systems assist decision-makers in making the best decisions. The widespread application of the internet has transformed the development of decision support systems into a web-based challenge. On the other hand, project selection has always been a significant issue for organizations. The limitation of resources and the existence of different criteria while selecting projects cause organizations to face the challenges of multiple-criteria decision making. In this research, a new approach is introduced for the selection of criteria. It also presents a new web-based decision support system for selecting projects considering uncertainty and various criteria, including organizational strategies, the seventh edition of project management standard, and sustainable development. Therefore, the economic, social, and environmental dimensions of sustainable development were included as project evaluation indicators. The proposed approach was developed using Pythagorean fuzzy sets, MEREC, and MARCOS methods to examine uncertainty and solution methods. In this approach, a new version of the MARCOS method was developed, with Pythagorean fuzzy sets for rankings. Also, a new development was presented using the Pythagorean fuzzy (PF)-MEREC method, which was used for weighting. The effectiveness of the proposed method is discussed through a real case study conducted on one of the mineral holdings in Iran. Among the mining projects introduced to the company, finally, the second project was selected. In the comparison made using PF-Entropy-TOPSIS and PF-Entropy-VIKOR methods, the superior project provided similar results. By changing the weights of the criteria for four different types of states, sensitivity analysis was used to determine the reliability of the final rankings. In these states, the weights of the criteria were moved together or assigned equal weights, and, in all four states, the ranking results were the same.

Suggested Citation

  • Asad Mahmoudian Azar Sharabiani & Seyed Meysam Mousavi, 2023. "A Web-Based Decision Support System for Project Evaluation with Sustainable Development Considerations Based on Two Developed Pythagorean Fuzzy Decision Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-31, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:23:p:16477-:d:1292288
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/23/16477/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/23/16477/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hassan Hashemi & Seyed Meysam Mousavi & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Alireza Chalekaee & Zenonas Turskis, 2018. "A New Group Decision Model Based on Grey-Intuitionistic Fuzzy-ELECTRE and VIKOR for Contractor Assessment Problem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-19, May.
    2. Yutao Yan & Zhongqiang Luo & Zhenyu Liu & Zhibo Liu, 2023. "Risk Assessment Analysis of Multiple Failure Modes Using the Fuzzy Rough FMECA Method: A Case of FACDG," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-21, August.
    3. Mbarka Selmi & Tarek Kormi & Nizar Bel Hadj Ali, 2016. "Comparison of multi-criteria decision methods through a ranking stability index," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 27(1/2), pages 165-183.
    4. Vladimir Strezov & Annette Evans & Tim J. Evans, 2017. "Assessment of the Economic, Social and Environmental Dimensions of the Indicators for Sustainable Development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(3), pages 242-253, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anita Fajczak-Kowalska & Anna Misztal & Magdalena Kowalska, 2021. "Energy, Pollution, and Transport Taxes as Instruments of Sustainable Development of Manufacturing Enterprises in Emerging Economies in the European Union," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2B), pages 724-742.
    2. Kokaraki, Nikoleta & Hopfe, Christina J. & Robinson, Elaine & Nikolaidou, Elli, 2019. "Testing the reliability of deterministic multi-criteria decision-making methods using building performance simulation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 991-1007.
    3. Hametner, Markus, 2022. "Economics without ecology: How the SDGs fail to align socioeconomic development with environmental sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    4. Matheus B. Frare & Ana P. C. Clauberg & Simone Sehnem & Lucila M. S. Campos & Juliano Spuldaro, 2020. "Toward a sustainable development indicators system for small municipalities," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(5), pages 1148-1167, September.
    5. Huanhuan Zhao & Yunbo Yu & Sunping Qu & Yong Liu, 2022. "A Grey Incidence Based Group Decision-Making Approach and Its Application," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-13, March.
    6. Peterson K. Ozili & Paul Terhemba Iorember, 2024. "Financial stability and sustainable development," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(3), pages 2620-2646, July.
    7. Zydrune Morkunaite & Romualdas Bausys & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas, 2019. "Contractor Selection for Sgraffito Decoration of Cultural Heritage Buildings Using the WASPAS-SVNS Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-25, November.
    8. Rolandas Drejeris & Danguolė Oželienė, 2019. "Modeling Environmental Actions of Corporate Sustainable Activity: Evidence from Lithuania," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2019(5), pages 69-93.
    9. Francesco Ciardiello & Andrea Genovese, 2023. "A comparison between TOPSIS and SAW methods," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(2), pages 967-994, June.
    10. Panagiotis Artelaris, 2022. "A development index for the Greek regions," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1261-1281, June.
    11. Barbieri, Elisa & Di Tommaso, Marco R. & Pollio, Chiara & Rubini, Lauretta, 2020. "Getting the specialization right. Industrialization in Southern China in a sustainable development perspective," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    12. Giuditta Contini & Margherita Peruzzini, 2022. "Sustainability and Industry 4.0: Definition of a Set of Key Performance Indicators for Manufacturing Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-37, September.
    13. Elise Barrella & Elisabeth Pyburn Spratto & Eric Pappas & Robert Nagel, 2018. "Developing and Validating an Individual Sustainability Instrument with Engineering Students to Motivate Intentional Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-24, August.
    14. Shih-Heng Yu, 2019. "Benchmarking and Performance Evaluation Towards the Sustainable Development of Regions in Taiwan: A Minimum Distance-Based Measure with Undesirable Outputs in Additive DEA," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 144(3), pages 1323-1348, August.
    15. Zhengmin Liu & Xiaolan Zhao & Lin Li & Xinya Wang & Di Wang & Peide Liu, 2020. "Selecting a Public Service Outsourcer Based on the Improved ELECTRE II Method with Unknown Weight Information under a Double Hierarchy Hesitant Linguistic Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-34, March.
    16. Xuhui Wang & Asad Hassan Butt & Qilin Zhang & Muhammad Nouman Shafique & Hassaan Ahmad & Zahid Nawaz, 2020. "Gaming Avatar Can Influence Sustainable Healthy Lifestyle: Be Like an Avatar," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-22, March.
    17. Qingsong Wang & Zhaopeng Xu & Qian Yuan & Xueliang Yuan & Jian Zuo & Yizhi Song & Mansen Wang, 2020. "Evaluation and countermeasures of sustainable development for urban energy‐economy‐environment system: A case study of Jinan in China," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(6), pages 1663-1677, November.
    18. Pascale Lehoux & Hudson Pacifico Silva & Renata Pozelli Sabio & Federico Roncarolo, 2018. "The Unexplored Contribution of Responsible Innovation in Health to Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-21, November.
    19. Anvar Tulaganov & Gulnara Sagindykova & Murad Isaev & Bibigul Bimbetova & Maira Kaiyrgaliyeva & Bakhitzhamal Aidosova & Aizhan Orynbassarova, 2022. "The Impact Analysis of Electricity Prices on the Energy Intensity of the Kazakhstani Economy and Sustainable Development," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(2), pages 241-248, March.
    20. Izabela Racka, 2021. "Drivers of Subregional Housing Markets in Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2B), pages 810-834.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:23:p:16477-:d:1292288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.