IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i23p16221-d1285754.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Human Behaviour Perspective on Horizontal Collaboration to Reduce the Climate Impact of Logistics

Author

Listed:
  • Frans Cruijssen

    (Department of Econometrics and Operations Research, Tilburg School of Economics and Management, Tilburg University, Warandelaan 2, 5037 AB Tilburg, The Netherlands)

  • Ilja van Beest

    (Department of Social Psychology, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Tilburg University, Warandelaan 2, 5037 AB Tilburg, The Netherlands)

  • Goos Kant

    (Department of Econometrics and Operations Research, Tilburg School of Economics and Management, Tilburg University, Warandelaan 2, 5037 AB Tilburg, The Netherlands)

Abstract

The transport sector needs to drastically reduce its carbon footprint to comply with the Paris Agreement. In today’s sharing economy, an emerging strategy to contribute to this goal is horizontal collaboration. However, most studies on horizontal collaboration or resource pooling are approached from a theoretical Operations Research perspective, and case studies are usually stylised. At the same time, the uptake of horizontal collaboration in practice is limited. An important explanation for this is that compared to traditional vertical collaboration, coalition formation is much more complex under horizontal collaboration, as some players will be included in the collaborative coalition, while others will be excluded. We conjecture that this renders human behaviour much more important than in more traditional vertical supply chain relations. Therefore, in this paper, we propose a research agenda for an interdisciplinary approach that integrates human behavioural aspects in studies on horizontal supply chain collaboration. We review some vital concepts from social psychology and discuss the importance to the success or failure of horizontal collaboration initiatives to reduce the environment footprint of the logistics sector. We conclude that social psychological insights on mixed-motive interactions are pivotal to understand wicked problems such as Sustainable Development Goal 13 on Climate Action, and that interdisciplinary approaches should therefore receive more attention in academic literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Frans Cruijssen & Ilja van Beest & Goos Kant, 2023. "A Human Behaviour Perspective on Horizontal Collaboration to Reduce the Climate Impact of Logistics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-15, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:23:p:16221-:d:1285754
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/23/16221/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/23/16221/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Biel, Anders & Thogersen, John, 2007. "Activation of social norms in social dilemmas: A review of the evidence and reflections on the implications for environmental behaviour," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 93-112, January.
    2. M A Krajewska & H Kopfer & G Laporte & S Ropke & G Zaccour, 2008. "Horizontal cooperation among freight carriers: request allocation and profit sharing," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(11), pages 1483-1491, November.
    3. Ranyard, J.C. & Fildes, R. & Hu, Tun-I, 2015. "Reassessing the scope of OR practice: The Influences of Problem Structuring Methods and the Analytics Movement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(1), pages 1-13.
    4. Lotte Verdonck & AN Caris & Katrien Ramaekers & Gerrit K. Janssens, 2013. "Collaborative Logistics from the Perspective of Road Transportation Companies," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(6), pages 700-719, November.
    5. Brocklesby, John, 2016. "The what, the why and the how of behavioural operational research—An invitation to potential sceptics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(3), pages 796-805.
    6. Gansterer, Margaretha & Hartl, Richard F., 2018. "Collaborative vehicle routing: A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(1), pages 1-12.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gansterer, Margaretha & Hartl, Richard F. & Sörensen, Kenneth, 2020. "Pushing frontiers in auction-based transport collaborations," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    2. Nassim Mrabti & Nadia Hamani & Laurent Delahoche, 2022. "A Comprehensive Literature Review on Sustainable Horizontal Collaboration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-38, September.
    3. Arslan, Okan & Archetti, Claudia & Jabali, Ola & Laporte, Gilbert & Grazia Speranza, Maria, 2020. "Minimum cost network design in strategic alliances," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    4. Guajardo, Mario & Rönnqvist, Mikael & Flisberg, Patrik & Frisk, Mikael, 2018. "Collaborative transportation with overlapping coalitions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(1), pages 238-249.
    5. Gansterer, Margaretha & Hartl, Richard F. & Savelsbergh, Martin, 2020. "The value of information in auction-based carrier collaborations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    6. Dan Liu & Zhenghong Deng & Qipeng Sun & Yong Wang & Yinhai Wang, 2019. "Design and Freight Corridor-Fleet Size Choice in Collaborative Intermodal Transportation Network Considering Economies of Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, February.
    7. De Moor, Bram J. & Creemers, Stefan & Boute, Robert N., 2023. "Breaking truck dominance in supply chains: Proactive freight consolidation and modal split transport," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    8. Molenbruch, Yves & Braekers, Kris & Caris, An, 2017. "Benefits of horizontal cooperation in dial-a-ride services," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 97-119.
    9. Fernández, Elena & Roca-Riu, Mireia & Speranza, M. Grazia, 2018. "The Shared Customer Collaboration Vehicle Routing Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(3), pages 1078-1093.
    10. Lotte Verdonck & Katrien Ramaekers & Benoît Depaire & An Caris & Gerrit K. Janssens, 2019. "Analysing the Effect of Partner Characteristics on the Performance of Horizontal Carrier Collaborations," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 583-609, June.
    11. Niels Martin & Lotte Verdonck & An Caris & Benoît Depaire, 2018. "Horizontal collaboration in logistics: decision framework and typology," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 32-50, June.
    12. Defryn, Christof & Sörensen, Kenneth & Dullaert, Wout, 2019. "Integrating partner objectives in horizontal logistics optimisation models," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 1-12.
    13. Cruijssen, Frans, 2020. "Cross-Chain Collaboration in Logistics: Looking Back and Ahead," Other publications TiSEM f92f9dbe-0893-4f82-bda6-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    14. Gansterer, Margaretha & Hartl, Richard F., 2018. "Collaborative vehicle routing: A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(1), pages 1-12.
    15. Santos, Maria João & Curcio, Eduardo & Amorim, Pedro & Carvalho, Margarida & Marques, Alexandra, 2021. "A bilevel approach for the collaborative transportation planning problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    16. Bo Dai & Fenfen Li & Yunchong Liu, 2022. "A Profit Allocation Mechanism for Customer-to-Manufacturer Platform in e-Commercial Business," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    17. Johnson, Michael P. & Midgley, Gerald & Chichirau, George, 2018. "Emerging trends and new frontiers in community operational research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(3), pages 1178-1191.
    18. Alix Vargas & Shushma Patel & Dilip Patel, 2018. "Towards a Business Model Framework to Increase Collaboration in the Freight Industry," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-32, October.
    19. Richard Ormerod, 2017. "Writing practitioner case studies to help behavioural OR researchers ground their theories: application of the mangle perspective," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(5), pages 507-520, May.
    20. Ziebuhr, Mario & Kopfer, Herbert, 2016. "Solving an integrated operational transportation planning problem with forwarding limitations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 149-166.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:23:p:16221-:d:1285754. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.