IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i22p16090-d1283209.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study on the Crop Suitability and Planting Structure Optimization in Typical Grain Production Areas under the Influence of Human Activities and Climate Change: A Case Study of the Naoli River Basin in Northeast China

Author

Listed:
  • Jian Yin

    (Center for China Western Modernization, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang 550025, China
    College of Big Data Application and Economic, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang 550025, China
    School of Water Conservancy & Civil Engineering, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China)

  • Danqi Wei

    (Center for China Western Modernization, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang 550025, China
    College of Big Data Application and Economic, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang 550025, China)

Abstract

Optimizing crop planting structures under the influence of climate change and human activities is crucial for sustainable food production and global food security. Taking the Naoli River Basin in Northeast China as a case area, a machine learning model based on maximum entropy was used to explore the suitability distribution of crops under the influence of both environmental factors and human activities. The optimized planting structure strategies were tested in combination with future climate change. The results show that considering human activities can more accurately simulate crop suitability than considering only natural environmental factors. The suitable planting areas for maize, rice, and soybeans are 18,553.54 km 2 , 10,335.98 km 2 , and 5844.80 km 2 , respectively. Highly adapted areas for major crops are concentrated in the plain areas of the middle reaches of the river basin, rather than in populated areas, and there are overlaps among the suitable planting areas for each crop. The optimal crop distribution for the planting structure is to plant rice in the hydrophilic areas of the plain hinterland, soybeans in the plain hinterland farther from the water source, and corn in the peripheral plains and gently sloping mountainous areas. Human activities exerted a strong influence on the potential scatter of soybeans, while climate change had the most significant implications for maize. Future climate change may reduce the area of suitable crop zones, posing challenges to regional food production. It is necessary to reflect on how to rationally balance soil and water resources, as well as how to cope with climate change in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Jian Yin & Danqi Wei, 2023. "Study on the Crop Suitability and Planting Structure Optimization in Typical Grain Production Areas under the Influence of Human Activities and Climate Change: A Case Study of the Naoli River Basin in," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-28, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:22:p:16090-:d:1283209
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/22/16090/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/22/16090/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xilong Dai & Yue Wang & Xinhang Li & Kang Wang & Jia Zhou & Hongwei Ni, 2023. "Effects of Temporal and Spatial Changes in Wetlands on Regional Carbon Storage in the Naoli River Basin, Sanjiang Plain, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Wezel, Alexander & Vincent, Audrey & Nitsch, Heike & Schmid, Otto & Dubbert, Monika & Tasser, Erich & Fleury, Philippe & Stöckli, Sybille & Stolze, Matthias & Bogner, Daniel, 2018. "Farmers’ perceptions, preferences, and propositions for result-oriented measures in mountain farming," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 117-127.
    3. Umberto Lombardo & José Iriarte & Lautaro Hilbert & Javier Ruiz-Pérez & José M. Capriles & Heinz Veit, 2020. "Early Holocene crop cultivation and landscape modification in Amazonia," Nature, Nature, vol. 581(7807), pages 190-193, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Canessa, Carolin & Venus, Terese E. & Wiesmeier, Miriam & Mennig, Philipp & Sauer, Johannes, 2023. "Incentives, Rewards or Both in Payments for Ecosystem Services: Drawing a Link Between Farmers' Preferences and Biodiversity Levels," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    2. Jane Mills & Hannah Chiswell & Peter Gaskell & Paul Courtney & Beth Brockett & George Cusworth & Matt Lobley, 2021. "Developing Farm-Level Social Indicators for Agri-Environment Schemes: A Focus on the Agents of Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-22, July.
    3. Wolfgang Onyeali & Michael P. Schlaile & Bastian Winkler, 2023. "Navigating the Biocosmos: Cornerstones of a Bioeconomic Utopia," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-32, June.
    4. Simpson, Katherine & Armsworth, Paul R. & Dallimer, Martin & Nthambi, Mary & de Vries, Frans P. & Hanley, Nick, 2023. "Improving the ecological and economic performance of agri-environment schemes: Payment by modelled results versus payment for actions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    5. Abadi, Bijan & Yadollahi, Arash & Bybordi, Ahmad & Rahmati, Mehdi, 2020. "The contribution of diverse motivations for adhering to soil conservation initiatives and the role of conservation agriculture features in decision-making," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    6. Chaplin, S.P. & Mills, J. & Chiswell, H., 2021. "Developing payment-by-results approaches for agri-environment schemes: Experience from an arable trial in England," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    7. Pierre Desrochers & Vincent Geloso & Joanna Szurmak, 2021. "Care to Wager Again? An Appraisal of Paul Ehrlich's Counterbet Offer to Julian Simon, Part 2: Critical Analysis," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(2), pages 808-829, March.
    8. Šumrada, Tanja & Vreš, Branko & Čelik, Tatjana & Šilc, Urban & Rac, Ilona & Udovč, Andrej & Erjavec, Emil, 2021. "Are result-based schemes a superior approach to the conservation of High Nature Value grasslands? Evidence from Slovenia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    9. Matteo Olivieri & Maria Andreoli & Daniele Vergamini & Fabio Bartolini, 2021. "Innovative Contract Solutions for the Provision of Agri-Environmental Climatic Public Goods: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-22, June.
    10. repec:arp:sjavsm:2021:p:85-91 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Thomas W. Lee & John H. Walker, 2022. "Forests and Farmers: GIS Analysis of Forest Islands and Large Raised Fields in the Bolivian Amazon," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-26, May.
    12. Zabel, Astrid, 2019. "Biodiversity-based payments on Swiss alpine pastures," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 153-159.
    13. Alexander Wezel & Sibylle Stöckli & Erich Tasser & Heike Nitsch & Audrey Vincent, 2021. "Good Pastures, Good Meadows: Mountain Farmers’ Assessment, Perceptions on Ecosystem Services, and Proposals for Biodiversity Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, May.
    14. Ma, Shimeng & Ritsema, Coen J. & Wang, Sufen, 2024. "Achieving sustainable crop management: A holistic approach to crop competitiveness assessment and structure optimization with dual natural-social environmental impacts," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    15. Douglas J. Kennett & Mark Lipson & Keith M. Prufer & David Mora-Marín & Richard J. George & Nadin Rohland & Mark Robinson & Willa R. Trask & Heather H. J. Edgar & Ethan C. Hill & Erin E. Ray & Paige L, 2022. "South-to-north migration preceded the advent of intensive farming in the Maya region," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    16. Yaqiu Zhu & Bangyou Zheng & Qiyou Luo & Weihua Jiao & Yadong Yang, 2023. "Uncovering the Drivers and Regional Variability of Cotton Yield in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:22:p:16090-:d:1283209. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.