IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i22p16042-d1282120.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Soil Organic Carbon Stability in Different Land Uses in Lithuania

Author

Listed:
  • Milda Muraškienė

    (Institute of Forestry, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, LT-53101 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Kęstutis Armolaitis

    (Institute of Forestry, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, LT-53101 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Iveta Varnagirytė-Kabašinskienė

    (Institute of Forestry, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, LT-53101 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Virgilijus Baliuckas

    (Institute of Forestry, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, LT-53101 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Jūratė Aleinikovienė

    (Department of Agronomy, Vytautas Magnus University Agriculture Academy, LT-53361 Kaunas, Lithuania)

Abstract

The effective management of soil organic carbon (SOC) is highlighted as one of the strategies and cost-effective options for mitigating climate change, while soil nitrogen (N) often is specified as an essential element for plant growth. This study was conducted to evaluate basic soil physical, chemical, and microbial indicators in three major soil types dominated in Lithuania—Arenosols, Retisols, and Cambisols—under forest land, perennial grassland, and arable land. Furthermore, soil microbial biomass carbon (SMBC) and nitrogen (SMBN), their ratio, and soil microbial respiration (microbial CO 2 ) next to SOC and total N were hypothesized to be important measures for assessing SOC stability under different land uses. Therefore, selected soil indicators were evaluated in the surface 0–10 and 10–20 cm mineral soil layers. The study results showed higher concentrations of SOC, N, SMBC, and SMBN, and soil microbial CO 2 in forest land and perennial grasslands than in arable land. The higher SMBC/SOC and SNBN/TN ratios indicated a higher ability to accumulate SOC and N in forest land and grasslands. Higher SOC immobilization in forest land and higher N immobilization in arable land were both specified by the obtained SMBC:SMBN ratio. This study identified forest land followed by grassland as the best land management practice that addresses soil C sequestration through higher C immobilisation. Assessing soil in forest land as a control land use next to the agricultural land could be a reasonable soil management practice to evaluate C sequestration in the region. Additionally, it was assumed that evaluation of the SMBC and SMBN concentrations together with soil physical and chemical indicators allow for a more effective assessment of SOC stability. Taken together, these findings support recommendation to develop grassland (and especially forest land systems) through afforestation or within agroforestry system, without reducing the importance of the agricultural sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Milda Muraškienė & Kęstutis Armolaitis & Iveta Varnagirytė-Kabašinskienė & Virgilijus Baliuckas & Jūratė Aleinikovienė, 2023. "Evaluation of Soil Organic Carbon Stability in Different Land Uses in Lithuania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-17, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:22:p:16042-:d:1282120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/22/16042/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/22/16042/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. E. A. G. Schuur & A. D. McGuire & C. Schädel & G. Grosse & J. W. Harden & D. J. Hayes & G. Hugelius & C. D. Koven & P. Kuhry & D. M. Lawrence & S. M. Natali & D. Olefeldt & V. E. Romanovsky & K. Schae, 2015. "Climate change and the permafrost carbon feedback," Nature, Nature, vol. 520(7546), pages 171-179, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jinting Guo & Yuanman Hu & Zaiping Xiong & Xiaolu Yan & Chunlin Li & Rencang Bu, 2017. "Variations in Growing-Season NDVI and Its Response to Permafrost Degradation in Northeast China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-15, April.
    2. Xiangwen Wu & Shuying Zang & Dalong Ma & Jianhua Ren & Qiang Chen & Xingfeng Dong, 2019. "Emissions of CO 2 , CH 4 , and N 2 O Fluxes from Forest Soil in Permafrost Region of Daxing’an Mountains, Northeast China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-14, August.
    3. Brock, W. & Xepapadeas, A., 2017. "Climate change policy under polar amplification," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 93-112.
    4. Dmitry Orlov & Marija Menshakova & Tomas Thierfelder & Yulia Zaika & Sepp Böhme & Birgitta Evengard & Natalia Pshenichnaya, 2020. "Healthy Ecosystems Are a Prerequisite for Human Health—A Call for Action in the Era of Climate Change with a Focus on Russia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-11, November.
    5. Louise Kessler, 2015. "Estimating the economic impact of the permafrost carbon feedback," GRI Working Papers 219, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
    6. Zhichao Xu & Wei Shan & Ying Guo & Chengcheng Zhang & Lisha Qiu, 2022. "Swamp Wetlands in Degraded Permafrost Areas Release Large Amounts of Methane and May Promote Wildfires through Friction Electrification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-28, July.
    7. Xiaoni You & Xiangying Li & Mika Sillanpää & Rong Wang & Chengyong Wu & Qiangqiang Xu, 2022. "Export of Dissolved Organic Carbon from the Source Region of Yangtze River in the Tibetan Plateau," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    8. Roman Desyatkin & Matrena Okoneshnikova & Alexandra Ivanova & Maya Nikolaeva & Nikolay Filippov & Alexey Desyatkin, 2022. "Dynamics of Vegetation and Soil Cover of Pyrogenically Disturbed Areas of the Northern Taiga under Conditions of Thermokarst Development and Climate Warming," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-21, September.
    9. Rising, James A. & Taylor, Charlotte & Ives, Matthew C. & Ward, Robert E.T., 2022. "Challenges and innovations in the economic evaluation of the risks of climate change," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    10. Andrei G. Shepelev & Alexander Kizyakov & Sebastian Wetterich & Alexandra Cherepanova & Alexander Fedorov & Igor Syromyatnikov & Grigoriy Savvinov, 2020. "Sub-Surface Carbon Stocks in Northern Taiga Landscapes Exposed in the Batagay Megaslump, Yana Upland, Yakutia," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-16, August.
    11. Dandan Song & Yuanquan Cui & Dalong Ma & Xin Li & Lin Liu, 2022. "Spatial Variation of Microbial Community Structure and Its Driving Environmental Factors in Two Forest Types in Permafrost Region of Greater Xing′an Mountains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-15, July.
    12. Yiming Wang & Pengcheng Xiang, 2018. "Urban Sprawl Sustainability of Mountainous Cities in the Context of Climate Change Adaptability Using a Coupled Coordination Model: A Case Study of Chongqing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, December.
    13. Jan Åge Riseth & Hans Tømmervik & Morten Tryland, 2020. "Spreading or Gathering? Can Traditional Knowledge Be a Resource to Tackle Reindeer Diseases Associated with Climate Change?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-19, August.
    14. Rickels, Wilfried & Merk, Christine & Honneth, Johannes & Schwinger, Jörg & Quaas, Martin F. & Oschlies, Andreas, 2019. "Welche Rolle spielen negative Emissionen für die zukünftige Klimapolitik? Eine ökonomische Einschätzung des 1,5°C-Sonderberichts des Weltklimarats," Kiel Working Papers 2116, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    15. Fouad El Ouardighi & Eugene Khmelnitsky & Marc Leandri, 2020. "Production-based pollution versus deforestation: optimal policy with state-independent and-dependent environmental absorption efficiency restoration process," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 292(1), pages 1-26, September.
    16. Jianjian He & Pengyan Zhang & Wenlong Jing & Yuhang Yan, 2018. "Spatial Responses of Net Ecosystem Productivity of the Yellow River Basin under Diurnal Asymmetric Warming," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, October.
    17. Wang, Guofeng & Deng, Xiangzheng & Wang, Jingyu & Zhang, Fan & Liang, Shiqi, 2019. "Carbon emission efficiency in China: A spatial panel data analysis," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 1-1.
    18. Huan Wang & Jiejun Huang & Han Zhou & Lixue Zhao & Yanbin Yuan, 2019. "An Integrated Variational Mode Decomposition and ARIMA Model to Forecast Air Temperature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-11, July.
    19. Chmielewska Anna & Sławiński Andrzej, 2021. "Climate crisis, central banks and the IMF reform," Economics and Business Review, Sciendo, vol. 7(4), pages 7-27, December.
    20. Chenzheng Li & Anatoly V. Brouchkov & Viktor G. Cheverev & Andrey V. Sokolov & Kunyang Li, 2022. "Emission of Methane and Carbon Dioxide during Soil Freezing without Permafrost," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-11, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:22:p:16042-:d:1282120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.