IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i22p15899-d1279376.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Numerical and Experimental Investigation of a Compressive-Mode Hull Piezoelectric Energy Harvester under Impact Force

Author

Listed:
  • Su Xian Long

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia)

  • Shin Yee Khoo

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
    Advanced Shock and Vibration Research Group, Applied Vibration Laboratory, Block R, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
    Centre of Research Industry 4.0 (CRI 4.0), Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia)

  • Zhi Chao Ong

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
    Advanced Shock and Vibration Research Group, Applied Vibration Laboratory, Block R, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
    Centre of Research Industry 4.0 (CRI 4.0), Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia)

  • Ming Foong Soong

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia)

  • Yu-Hsi Huang

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan
    Graduate School of Advanced Technology, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan)

Abstract

In recent years, much research has been carried out to enhance the efficiency of the piezoelectric energy harvester (PEH). This study focuses on the performance of the compressive Hull PEH under impact forces, which simulates real-world scenarios, such as foot strikes or vehicular wheel excitations, more accurately compared to harmonic forces. The experimental results prove the performance of the Hull PEH with less than 5.2% of deviation compared to finite element analysis outcomes under impact forces between 10 N and 1 kN. The Hull PEH more substantially amplified the input force and compressed the piezoelectric material, which was Lead Zirconate Titanate (PZT). Consequently, it amplified the voltage output of a standalone PZT up to 16.9 times under a similar boundary condition. A maximum peak power output of 7.16 W was produced across 50 kΩ of optimum load resistance under 1 kN of impact force, which surpassed the benchmark Cymbal PEH by 37.68 times. Furthermore, it demonstrated a higher energy conversion efficiency of 84.38% under the impact force compared to the harmonic force. This research conclusively proves that the Hull PEH has superior performance in terms of voltage output, power output, loading capacity, and efficiency, making it a promising technology for impact loading applications to generate green energy.

Suggested Citation

  • Su Xian Long & Shin Yee Khoo & Zhi Chao Ong & Ming Foong Soong & Yu-Hsi Huang, 2023. "Numerical and Experimental Investigation of a Compressive-Mode Hull Piezoelectric Energy Harvester under Impact Force," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-14, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:22:p:15899-:d:1279376
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/22/15899/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/22/15899/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shan, Xiaobiao & Tian, Haigang & Chen, Danpeng & Xie, Tao, 2019. "A curved panel energy harvester for aeroelastic vibration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C), pages 58-66.
    2. Evans, Annette & Strezov, Vladimir & Evans, Tim J., 2009. "Assessment of sustainability indicators for renewable energy technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(5), pages 1082-1088, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Agnieszka Operacz, 2021. "Possibility of Hydropower Development: A Simple-to-Use Index," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-19, May.
    2. L. Hay & A. H. B. Duffy & R. I. Whitfield, 2017. "The S‐Cycle Performance Matrix: Supporting Comprehensive Sustainability Performance Evaluation of Technical Systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(1), pages 45-70, January.
    3. Emblemsvåg, Jan, 2022. "Wind energy is not sustainable when balanced by fossil energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    4. Fonseca, Juan D. & Commenge, Jean-Marc & Camargo, Mauricio & Falk, Laurent & Gil, Iván D., 2021. "Sustainability analysis for the design of distributed energy systems: A multi-objective optimization approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    5. Gottschamer, L. & Zhang, Q., 2016. "Interactions of factors impacting implementation and sustainability of renewable energy sourced electricity," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 164-174.
    6. Hong, Sanghyun & Bradshaw, Corey J.A. & Brook, Barry W., 2014. "South Korean energy scenarios show how nuclear power can reduce future energy and environmental costs," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 569-578.
    7. Mostafa Shaaban & Jürgen Scheffran & Jürgen Böhner & Mohamed S. Elsobki, 2018. "Sustainability Assessment of Electricity Generation Technologies in Egypt Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-25, May.
    8. Aleksandra Matuszewska-Janica & Dorota Żebrowska-Suchodolska & Urszula Ala-Karvia & Marta Hozer-Koćmiel, 2021. "Changes in Electricity Production from Renewable Energy Sources in the European Union Countries in 2005–2019," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-27, October.
    9. Toledo, Olga Moraes & Oliveira Filho, Delly & Diniz, Antônia Sônia Alves Cardoso, 2010. "Distributed photovoltaic generation and energy storage systems: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 506-511, January.
    10. Hong, Sanghyun & Bradshaw, Corey J.A. & Brook, Barry W., 2014. "Nuclear power can reduce emissions and maintain a strong economy: Rating Australia’s optimal future electricity-generation mix by technologies and policies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 712-725.
    11. Nguyen, Hai Tra & Safder, Usman & Nhu Nguyen, X.Q. & Yoo, ChangKyoo, 2020. "Multi-objective decision-making and optimal sizing of a hybrid renewable energy system to meet the dynamic energy demands of a wastewater treatment plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    12. Karytsas, Spyridon & Theodoropoulou, Helen, 2014. "Socioeconomic and demographic factors that influence publics' awareness on the different forms of renewable energy sources," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 480-485.
    13. Maiti, Moinak, 2022. "Does development in venture capital investments influence green growth?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    14. Amini, Ali & Mirkhani, Nima & Pakjesm Pourfard, Pedram & Ashjaee, Mehdi & Khodkar, Mohammad Amin, 2015. "Thermo-economic optimization of low-grade waste heat recovery in Yazd combined-cycle power plant (Iran) by a CO2 transcritical Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 74-84.
    15. Zhang, L.B. & Dai, H.L. & Abdelkefi, A. & Lin, S.X. & Wang, L., 2019. "Theoretical modeling, wind tunnel measurements, and realistic environment testing of galloping-based electromagnetic energy harvesters," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    16. Prehoda, Emily W. & Pearce, Joshua M., 2017. "Potential lives saved by replacing coal with solar photovoltaic electricity production in the U.S," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 710-715.
    17. Sokka, L. & Sinkko, T. & Holma, A. & Manninen, K. & Pasanen, K. & Rantala, M. & Leskinen, P., 2016. "Environmental impacts of the national renewable energy targets – A case study from Finland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 1599-1610.
    18. Suopajärvi, Hannu & Pongrácz, Eva & Fabritius, Timo, 2013. "The potential of using biomass-based reducing agents in the blast furnace: A review of thermochemical conversion technologies and assessments related to sustainability," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 511-528.
    19. Magdalena Tutak & Jarosław Brodny & Dominika Siwiec & Robert Ulewicz & Peter Bindzár, 2020. "Studying the Level of Sustainable Energy Development of the European Union Countries and Their Similarity Based on the Economic and Demographic Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-31, December.
    20. Bonou, Alexandra & Laurent, Alexis & Olsen, Stig I., 2016. "Life cycle assessment of onshore and offshore wind energy-from theory to application," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 327-337.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:22:p:15899-:d:1279376. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.