IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i21p15502-d1271882.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corridor Planning–Sustainable Planning?

Author

Listed:
  • Željka Jurković

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Ulica Vladimira Preloga 3, 31000 Osijek, Croatia)

  • Danijela Lovoković

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Ulica Vladimira Preloga 3, 31000 Osijek, Croatia)

Abstract

Climate change and accelerated development that threaten the survival of humankind require an urgent review of planning approaches to achieve sustainable development, including transport systems, since the quantity of motorised traffic and GHG emissions is increasing yearly. Urban planning of post-industrial cities, the digital age, climate change—all this requires that urban planning is not only the planning of settlements where residents will meet their functional needs, but also for cities to be leaders in the fight against climate change. The question arises as to which planning approach is the most suitable for planning sustainable cities in the 21st century. After a literature review and research of the authors, urban corridor planning is suggested as one of the possible planning strategies. When planning new or revitalising existing intra-city corridors within urban areas, to take into account their spatial, environmental, social and economic sustainability is necessary. After an analysis, indicators of urban corridor planning were extracted, and the article highlights the advantages and priorities. The contribution of the article is in determining the ten basic principles of urban corridor planning. It is concluded that implementation of urban corridor planning principles in the planning of intra-city corridors achieves the result of urban sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Željka Jurković & Danijela Lovoković, 2023. "Corridor Planning–Sustainable Planning?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-16, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:21:p:15502-:d:1271882
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/21/15502/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/21/15502/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Željka Jurković & Marijana Hadzima-Nyarko & Danijela Lovoković, 2021. "Railway Corridors in Croatian Cities as Factors of Sustainable Spatial and Cultural Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-14, June.
    2. Jonathon M. Harris, "undated". "Basic Principles of Sustainable Development," GDAE Working Papers 00-04, GDAE, Tufts University.
    3. Jacopo Scudellari & Luca Staricco & Elisabetta Vitale Brovarone, 2020. "Implementing the Supermanzana approach in Barcelona. Critical issues at local and urban level," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(6), pages 675-696, November.
    4. Hanna Mattila & Pia Olsson & Tiina-Riitta Lappi & Karoliina Ojanen, 2022. "Ethnographic Knowledge in Urban Planning – Bridging the Gap between the Theories of Knowledge-Based and Communicative Planning," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 11-25, January.
    5. Dorsa Alipour & Hussein Dia, 2023. "A Systematic Review of the Role of Land Use, Transport, and Energy-Environment Integration in Shaping Sustainable Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-29, April.
    6. Harris, Jonathan M., 2000. "Basic Principles of Sustainable Development," Working Papers 15600, Tufts University, Global Development and Environment Institute.
    7. Deakin, Elizabeth, 2001. "Sustainable Development & Sustainable Transportation: Strategies for Economic Prosperity, Environmental Quality, and Equity," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt8mf1z8mh, University of California Transportation Center.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Isin Ceti̇n, 2017. "Accounting Requirements And Records On Bank Subscribed Capital Compliance With European Directives," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1, pages 52-68, February.
    2. Aguayo, Francisco & Gallagher, Kevin P., 2005. "Economic reform, energy, and development: the case of Mexican manufacturing," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(7), pages 829-837, May.
    3. Olfa JABALLI & Sebnem SAHIN, 2010. "Green Accounting and Climate Change Problem: A New Evidence from the Turkish Economy," EcoMod2004 330600071, EcoMod.
    4. Zahid Yousaf & Brutu Mădălina & Daniela Mihai & Hrestic Maria-Luiza & Ștefan Maria Cristina & Popescu Constantin, 2022. "Pollution Reduction as Catalyst between Environmental Resources Conservation Efforts and Sustainable Development: Investigation of Energy Firms in Circular Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-13, September.
    5. Alba Manresa & Dalilis Escobar Rivera, 2021. "Excellence in Sustainable Management in a Changing Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, February.
    6. Yan Cai & Eunmi Kim, 2019. "Sustainable Development in World Trade Law: Application of the Precautionary Principle in Korea-Radionuclides," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-18, April.
    7. Timothy A. Wise, "undated". "Understanding the Farm Problem: Six Common Errors in Presenting Farm Statistics," GDAE Working Papers 05-02, GDAE, Tufts University.
    8. Marco Grasso & Enzo Di Giulio, 2003. "Mapping sustainable development in a capability perspective," HEW 0309001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Anil P. Dongre, 2018. "Policy Initiatives for Governance of Socially Sustainable Development: India’s Account of Incessant Endeavors," Emerging Economy Studies, International Management Institute, vol. 4(1), pages 40-61, May.
    10. Fred Saunders & Michael Gilek & Anda Ikauniece & Ralph Voma Tafon & Kira Gee & Jacek Zaucha, 2020. "Theorizing Social Sustainability and Justice in Marine Spatial Planning: Democracy, Diversity, and Equity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-18, March.
    11. Lehtonen, Markku, 2004. "The environmental-social interface of sustainable development: capabilities, social capital, institutions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 199-214, June.
    12. Pahlavani, Parham & Sheikhian, Hossein & Bigdeli, Behnaz, 2020. "Evaluation of residential land use compatibilities using a density-based IOWA operator and an ANFIS-based model: A case study of Tehran, Iran," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    13. Bazyli Czyżewski & Marta Guth, 2021. "Impact of Policy and Factor Intensity on Sustainable Value of European Agriculture: Exploring Trade-Offs of Environmental, Economic and Social Efficiency at the Regional Level," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, January.
    14. Bekmez, Selahattin & Gokalp, M. Faysal, 2004. "Trade Liberalization and Pollution in Turkey: An Empirical Re-evaluation of Pollution Heavens Hypothesis," Conference papers 331273, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    15. Tareq O Bani-Khalid, 2019. "Corporate Sustainability Reporting: A longitudinal Analysis of its Evolutionary Pattern," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 9(3), pages 17-23, July.
    16. Elise Barrella & Elisabeth Pyburn Spratto & Eric Pappas & Robert Nagel, 2018. "Developing and Validating an Individual Sustainability Instrument with Engineering Students to Motivate Intentional Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-24, August.
    17. Frank Ackerman & Sumreen Mirza, "undated". "Waste in the Inner City: Asset or Assault?," GDAE Working Papers 00-08, GDAE, Tufts University.
    18. Forson, Joseph Ato, 2014. "A “Recursive Framework” of Corruption and Development: Comparison between Economic and Sustainable outcomes," MPRA Paper 102211, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 10 Nov 2016.
    19. Szopik-Depczyńska, Katarzyna & Cheba, Katarzyna & Bąk, Iwona & Kiba-Janiak, Maja & Saniuk, Sebastian & Dembińska, Izabela & Ioppolo, Giuseppe, 2017. "The application of relative taxonomy to the study of disproportions in the area of sustainable development of the European Union," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 481-491.
    20. Julie A. Nelson, "undated". "Is Economics a Natural Science?," GDAE Working Papers 04-03, GDAE, Tufts University.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:21:p:15502-:d:1271882. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.