IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i20p15147-d1265118.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

MIAR forest Reproducibility and Reliability for Assessing Occupational Risks in the Rainforest

Author

Listed:
  • Killian Lima

    (Associated Laboratory for Energy, Transports and Aeronautics (LAETA/PROA), Faculty of Engineering of University of Porto—FEUP, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, s/n, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

  • Ana C. Meira Castro

    (Centro de Recursos Naturais e Ambiente (CERENA-Porto), School of Engineering, Polytechnic of Porto—ISEP, Rua Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 431, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal)

  • João Santos Baptista

    (Associated Laboratory for Energy, Transports and Aeronautics (LAETA/PROA), Faculty of Engineering of University of Porto—FEUP, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, s/n, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

Abstract

The Method for the Integrated Assessment of Risks for rainforest (MIAR forest ) is a specific methodology for assessing the risk of occupational accidents associated with working in native tropical forests. MIAR forest was validated for the results’ reproducibility and the reliability of calculated risk levels through the Delphi approach. Two rounds of questionnaires illustrating ten scenarios of activities associated with the logging process in the Eastern Amazon’s native rainforest (Brazil) were presented to forestry and occupational health and safety (OHS) experts. In the first round, the questionnaire was answered anonymously by 55 experts, and in the second, by 46. A percentage of agreement of at least 80% in each question was considered to close the process. Questions that did not meet the criterion in the first round were reassessed in the second round. The obtained results lead to the conclusion that MIAR forest , an occupational accident risk assessment tool, has been effectively validated, demonstrating inter-rater reproducibility and reliability in determining risk values. These results highlight the objectivity and reliability of MIAR forest .

Suggested Citation

  • Killian Lima & Ana C. Meira Castro & João Santos Baptista, 2023. "MIAR forest Reproducibility and Reliability for Assessing Occupational Risks in the Rainforest," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-14, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:15147-:d:1265118
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/20/15147/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/20/15147/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Margherita Micheletti Cremasco & Ambra Giustetto & Federica Caffaro & Andrea Colantoni & Eugenio Cavallo & Stefano Grigolato, 2019. "Risk Assessment for Musculoskeletal Disorders in Forestry: A Comparison between RULA and REBA in the Manual Feeding of a Wood-Chipper," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-13, March.
    2. Killian Lima & Ana C. Meira Castro & João Santos Baptista, 2023. "Occupational Risk Assessment in Native Rainforest Management (MIAR forest )—Parameters Definition and Validation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-15, April.
    3. Yovi, Efi Yuliati & Nurrochmat, Dodik Ridho, 2018. "An occupational ergonomics in the Indonesian state mandatory sustainable forest management instrument: A review," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 27-35.
    4. Martin Jankovský & Michal Allman & Zuzana Allmanová, 2019. "What Are the Occupational Risks in Forestry? Results of a Long-Term Study in Slovakia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-17, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manuel Hita-Gutiérrez & Marta Gómez-Galán & Manuel Díaz-Pérez & Ángel-Jesús Callejón-Ferre, 2020. "An Overview of REBA Method Applications in the World," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-22, April.
    2. Marta Gómez-Galán & Ángel-Jesús Callejón-Ferre & José Pérez-Alonso & Manuel Díaz-Pérez & Jesús-Antonio Carrillo-Castrillo, 2020. "Musculoskeletal Risks: RULA Bibliometric Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-52, June.
    3. Federica Caffaro & Giorgia Bagagiolo & Margherita Micheletti Cremasco & Lucia Vigoroso & Eugenio Cavallo, 2020. "Tailoring Safety Training Material to Migrant Farmworkers: An Ergonomic User-Centred Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-14, March.
    4. Zhao Xu & Weijie Pan & Yukang Hou & Kailun He & Jian Lv, 2022. "A Decision Tree Model for Analysis and Judgment of Lower Limb Movement Comfort Level," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-21, May.
    5. Yanchen Gong & Longlong Ren & Xiang Han & Ang Gao & Shuaijie Jing & Chunliang Feng & Yuepeng Song, 2022. "Analysis of Operating Conditions for Vibration of a Self-Propelled Monorail Branch Chipper," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-22, December.
    6. Muhamad Nurul Hisyam Yunus & Mohd Hafiidz Jaafar & Ahmad Sufril Azlan Mohamed & Nur Zaidi Azraai & Md. Sohrab Hossain, 2021. "Implementation of Kinetic and Kinematic Variables in Ergonomic Risk Assessment Using Motion Capture Simulation: A Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-14, August.
    7. Ruan C. M. Teixeira & Walter P. S. Guimarães & Josiel G. Ribeiro & Rubens A. Fernandes & Lennon B. F. Nascimento & Israel G. Torné & Fábio S. Cardoso & Gabriella R. Monteiro, 2022. "Analysis of the Reduction of Ergonomic Risks through the Implementation of an Automatic Tape Packaging Machine," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-18, November.
    8. Killian S. Lima & Ana C. Meira Castro & J. Santos Baptista & Ulisses Silva, 2020. "Wood-Logging Process Management in Eastern Amazonia (Brazil)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    9. Chiuhsiang Joe Lin & Remba Yanuar Efranto & Melina Andriani Santoso, 2021. "Identification of Workplace Social Sustainability Indicators Related to Employee Ergonomics Perception in Indonesian Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-24, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:15147-:d:1265118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.