Author
Listed:
- Mingxiao Liu
(Port Channel and Ocean Development Research Center, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China)
- Yaru Luo
(Port Channel and Ocean Development Research Center, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China)
- Fei Li
(South-to-North Water Transfer Middle Line Industrial Development Co., Ltd., Beijing 100071, China)
- Hao Hu
(Yellow River Conservancy Technical Institute, Kaifeng 475004, China)
- Dongpo Sun
(Port Channel and Ocean Development Research Center, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China)
Abstract
Considering environmental sustainability, ecological embankments are often adopted in rivers, which benefit both the erosion resistance and the ecological balance of the bank. In this paper, the effectiveness of different types of dominant grass species in ecological slope protection and their impact mechanisms, as well as the impact of non-directional inflow on erosion characteristics, were investigated. Based on the principle of similarity theory in hydraulic modeling and the characteristics of flood erosion in riverbanks, a test model system for hydraulic ecological simulation was designed, including a vegetation bank slope and channels. Three types of dominant grass species were selected, and 12 series of erosion experiments were conducted in the grassed slope of the test model. Three types of root–soil composites and a reference plain soil were involved in the tests, and soil mechanical indicators such as shear strength were collected. Experimental results show that root–soil composite is a special elastic–plastic material, which provides additional cohesive force to the soil due to its root consolidation and reinforcement effects, Δ c . The shear strength index reflecting soil cohesion was increased by 15% to 20%. The primary factor affecting slope erosion is the flushing velocity, and both the average erosion depth and the unit soil erosion loss present an exponential function with respect to this factor, while presenting a linear function with the angle of incoming flow. Compared with the plain soil slope, the ecological slope could decrease erosion significantly. The sand loss of the ecological slope is only 50~60% that of the plain soil slope as the flushing velocity is 3–4 m s −1 . In vertical flushing, the sand loss in the plain soil slope is 1.73–2.43 times that of the ecological slope. This research might provide technical support for the anti-scourability design of the ecological embankment.
Suggested Citation
Mingxiao Liu & Yaru Luo & Fei Li & Hao Hu & Dongpo Sun, 2023.
"Experimental Research on Erosion Characteristics of Ecological Slopes under the Scouring of Non-Directional Inflow,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-22, October.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:14688-:d:1256823
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Su, Xuemeng & Zhou, Zhengchao & Liu, Jun'e & Cao, Liguo & Liu, Junyang & Wang, Peipei, 2021.
"Estimating slope stability by the root reinforcement mechanism of Artemisia sacrorum on the Loess Plateau of China,"
Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 444(C).
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
- Qihong Yang & Chaobo Zhang & Shiming Yao & Jing Jiang, 2022.
"Root Distribution and Root Cohesion of Two Herbaceous Plants in the Loess Plateau of China,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-12, July.
- Shihang Ruan & Lixia Tang & Tongli Huang, 2022.
"The Pullout Mechanical Properties of Shrub Root Systems in a Typical Karst Area, Southwest China,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-14, March.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:14688-:d:1256823. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.