IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i19p14371-d1250812.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Governance Assessment of Community-Based Waste Reduction Program in Makassar

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Denny Latanna

    (Master Program on Environmental Science Graduate School, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jl. Dipatiukur 35, Bandung 40132, West Java, Indonesia)

  • Budhi Gunawan

    (Center for Environment and Sustainability Science, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jl. Sekeloa Selatan 1, Bandung 40132, West Java, Indonesia
    Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jl. Raya Bandung Sumedang KM 21, Sumedang 45363, West Java, Indonesia)

  • María Laura Franco-García

    (CSTM Governance and Technology for Sustainability Department, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands)

  • Hans Bressers

    (CSTM Governance and Technology for Sustainability Department, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Indonesia’s government anticipates waste problems by managing them through a large number of waste reduction programs. From a governance perspective in Indonesia, it is known that actors from diverse governmental levels and across sectors are involved in waste management, and their involvement largely depends on their institutional goals and problems. Hence, they are expected to coherently collaborate by developing and implementing sustainable instruments and resources for improving waste management problems. However, it is necessary to understand how supportive or restrictive the governance of waste reduction programs is to encourage successful trash reduction. This study was designed to evaluate and examine the application of community-based solid waste management (CBSWM) in Makassar. In this research, the Governance Assessment Tool (GAT) was applied to analyze the governance context of the waste reduction programs in Makassar qualitatively. In the assessment, contexts can be described as either supportive or restrictive of the processes of implementing public policies on waste management. As a result of such an assessment, this study shed light on some opportunities to improve the governance of waste management implementation’s impact on reducing waste in Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. The conclusion of this study is that the most important actors are affiliated with the local government and the community. Moreover, this study shows that the assessment of contextual governance is that it is predominantly restrictive.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Denny Latanna & Budhi Gunawan & María Laura Franco-García & Hans Bressers, 2023. "Governance Assessment of Community-Based Waste Reduction Program in Makassar," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-11, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14371-:d:1250812
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14371/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14371/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fatmawati Fatmawati & Nuryanti Mustari & Haerana Haerana & Risma Niswaty & Abdillah Abdillah, 2022. "Waste Bank Policy Implementation through Collaborative Approach: Comparative Study—Makassar and Bantaeng, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-15, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muhammad Rifqi Ismiraj & Asri Wulansari & Yadi Setiadi & Aditia Pratama & Novi Mayasari, 2023. "Perceptions of Community-Based Waste Bank Operators and Customers on Its Establishment and Operationalization: Cases in Pangandaran, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-14, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14371-:d:1250812. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.