IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i19p14210-d1247843.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating the Mutual Feedback between Wind–Sand Fields and a Running Train on the Bridge–Road Transition Section of a Railway

Author

Listed:
  • Peng Wang

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Ning Huang

    (Key Laboratory of Ministry for Education on Western Disaster and Environment, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China)

  • Yanlu Qi

    (Xinjiang Railway Survey and Design Institute Co., Ltd., Urumqi 830011, China)

  • Wenhao Luo

    (CRRC Zhuzhou Locomotive Co., Ltd., Zhuzhou 412001, China)

  • Guowei Xin

    (School of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

Abstract

Strong wind–sand flow exerts great potential safety hazards for high-speed train operations. In this paper, we investigate the aerodynamic characteristics of high-speed trains passing through the bridge–road transition section under a wind-blown sand environment. In particular, we adopt the sliding grid method to simulate the changes in aerodynamic pressure on the train surface when the train passes the bridge transition at different speeds and bridge heights. The variation in the aerodynamic lateral force borne by the vehicle body at various times is then obtained. The results reveal that in the wind–sand environment, when a train drives from the bridge to the embankment, the pressure values on both the windward and leeward sides of the train change abruptly, with the most obvious increase in the lateral force of the head car. Moreover, the abrupt change in pressure increases with the speed of the lateral wind–sand flow. The differential pressure force of the train on the embankment is larger where the differential pressure force on both sides of the head train is the largest. When the train is running in the opposite direction, the differential pressure force on both sides of the train decreases. Compared with the lateral wind condition, the lateral force at different positions of the train under the wind–sand condition exceeds that under the non-sand condition. The average increases in the train body are approximately 17.6% (10 m/s), 10.5% (20 m/s) and 9.5% (30 m/s), which will cause passengers to experience an obvious “shaking” phenomenon.

Suggested Citation

  • Peng Wang & Ning Huang & Yanlu Qi & Wenhao Luo & Guowei Xin, 2023. "Investigating the Mutual Feedback between Wind–Sand Fields and a Running Train on the Bridge–Road Transition Section of a Railway," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-17, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14210-:d:1247843
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14210/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14210/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shengbo Xie & Xian Zhang & Yingjun Pang, 2022. "Wind Dynamic Characteristics and Wind Tunnel Simulation of Subgrade Sand Hazard in the Shannan Wide Valley of the Sichuan–Tibet Railway," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-18, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bingtong Wan & Xueying Bao & Aichun Li, 2024. "The Coupling Mechanism between Railway Alignment Design and Resource Environment in the Southwestern Mountainous Areas of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-23, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14210-:d:1247843. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.