IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i19p14101-d1246136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mexico on Track to Protect 30% of Its Marine Area by 2030

Author

Listed:
  • Susana Perera-Valderrama

    (National Commission for the Knowledge and Use of Biodiversity (CONABIO), Liga Periférico—Insurgentes Sur 4903, Parques del Pedregal, Tlalpan, Mexico City 14010, Mexico)

  • Laura Olivia Rosique-de la Cruz

    (National Commission for the Knowledge and Use of Biodiversity (CONABIO), Liga Periférico—Insurgentes Sur 4903, Parques del Pedregal, Tlalpan, Mexico City 14010, Mexico)

  • Hansel Caballero-Aragón

    (National Commission for the Knowledge and Use of Biodiversity (CONABIO), Liga Periférico—Insurgentes Sur 4903, Parques del Pedregal, Tlalpan, Mexico City 14010, Mexico)

  • Sergio Cerdeira-Estrada

    (National Commission for the Knowledge and Use of Biodiversity (CONABIO), Liga Periférico—Insurgentes Sur 4903, Parques del Pedregal, Tlalpan, Mexico City 14010, Mexico)

  • Raúl Martell-Dubois

    (National Commission for the Knowledge and Use of Biodiversity (CONABIO), Liga Periférico—Insurgentes Sur 4903, Parques del Pedregal, Tlalpan, Mexico City 14010, Mexico)

  • Rainer Ressl

    (National Commission for the Knowledge and Use of Biodiversity (CONABIO), Liga Periférico—Insurgentes Sur 4903, Parques del Pedregal, Tlalpan, Mexico City 14010, Mexico)

Abstract

Mexico has committed to protecting 30% of its marine territory by 2030 to comply with Target 3 of the Kunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, adopted during the 15th Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity. In this paper, we demonstrate the feasibility of meeting this commitment by determining the marine extent of conservation measures based on legally established Marine Protected Areas and areas that meet the criteria to be considered as Other Effective area-based Conservation Measures (OECMs) and determining the marine extent of areas proposed in various conservation planning exercises that can be created as any of the area-based instruments that exist in Mexico. The total coverage of existing and proposed areas was calculated by merging the dataset to remove duplicates and dissolving the boundaries between polygons to determine the total area. Spatial analysis was carried out in ArcGIS using geoprocessing tools. Currently, more than 25% of Mexico’s marine area is legally protected or conserved, with federal marine protected areas covering more than 22% of the Exclusive Economic Zone. The legally established areas that can be considered OECMs cover about 3% of the marine territory. We found that more than 9% of Mexico’s Economic Exclusive Zone contains areas of high conservation importance that are not covered by any area-based instrument. This study shows that Mexico has the potential to protect or conserve 32.8% of its marine territory by 2030.

Suggested Citation

  • Susana Perera-Valderrama & Laura Olivia Rosique-de la Cruz & Hansel Caballero-Aragón & Sergio Cerdeira-Estrada & Raúl Martell-Dubois & Rainer Ressl, 2023. "Mexico on Track to Protect 30% of Its Marine Area by 2030," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-21, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14101-:d:1246136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14101/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14101/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Morales-Zárate, M.V. & López-Ramírez, J.A. & Salinas-Zavala, C.A., 2021. "Loggerhead marine turtle (Caretta caretta) ecological facts from a trophic relationship model in a hot spot fishery area: Gulf of Ulloa, Mexico," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 439(C).
    2. Ana Filipa Ferreira & Heike Zimmermann & Rui Santos & Henrik von Wehrden, 2020. "Biosphere Reserves’ Management Effectiveness—A Systematic Literature Review and a Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-32, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Trace Gale & Andrea Báez Montenegro, 2024. "Toward Understanding Research Evolution on Indirect Drivers of Ecosystem Change along the Interface of Protected and Non-Protected Lands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-26, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. César Augusto Salinas-Zavala & María Verónica Morales-Zárate & Beatriz Diaz-Santana-Iturrios & Ismael Sánchez-Brito, 2022. "Social Vulnerability of the Fishing Community to Restrictive Public Policies: Case Study the Gulf of Ulloa, Mexico," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-13, October.
    2. Aida Mammadova & Christopher D. Smith & Tatiana Yashina, 2021. "Comparative Analysis between the Role of Local Communities in Regional Development inside Japanese and Russian UNESCO’s Biosphere Reserves: Case Studies of Mount Hakusan and Katunskiy Biosphere Reserv," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-23, September.
    3. Jana Špulerová & Veronika Piscová & Noemi Matušicová, 2023. "The Contribution of Scientists to the Research in Biosphere Reserves in Slovakia," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, February.
    4. Mónica de Castro-Pardo & João C. Azevedo, 2021. "A Goal Programming Model to Guide Decision-Making Processes towards Conservation Consensuses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-25, February.
    5. Catron, Spencer & Roth, Sarah & Zumpano, Francesca & Bintz, Jason & Fordyce, James A. & Lenhart, Suzanne & Miller, Debra L. & Wyneken, Jeanette, 2023. "Modeling the impacts of temperature during nesting seasons on Loggerhead (Caretta caretta) Sea Turtle populations in South Florida," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 481(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14101-:d:1246136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.