IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i18p13449-d1235402.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corridors Construction and Development Strategies for Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Study about the Yangtze River Economic Belt

Author

Listed:
  • Tianxin Zhang

    (Faculty of Geography, Yunnan Normal University, No. 768 Juxian Road, Kunming 650500, China)

  • Yuliang Yang

    (Faculty of Geography, Yunnan Normal University, No. 768 Juxian Road, Kunming 650500, China)

  • Xin Fan

    (Department of Land Resource Management, School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
    Center for Turkmenistan Studies, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Shengya Ou

    (State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China
    College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 101408, China)

Abstract

At present, there is obvious regional segmentation in the protection of intangible cultural heritage (ICH) in the Yangtze River Economic Belt. ArcGIS spatial analysis method and minimum cumulative resistance (MCR) models are used to investigate the distribution characteristics of ICH and the suitability of corridor construction in this region. On this basis, the strategies for heritage corridor construction are proposed. (1) The results show that the density and distribution of ICH in the Yangtze River Economic Belt have distinct regional characteristics: most of the high-density areas are in the eastern region, yet the low-density areas are mainly in the western region. (2) The suitability of heritage corridor construction decreases from west to east, and the unsuitable areas are mainly distributed in the western region. (3) According to the spatial characteristics of heritage distribution and the suitability of regional corridor construction, the ArcGIS spatial analysis method is used to determine 37 heritage corridors in the Yangtze River Economic Belt. (4) On this basis, a corridor construction method that uses linear landscape as the corridor theme and connects individual heritage points is proposed. The development strategy of heritage corridors should be in line with local conditions in different regions so as to realize regional collaborative development. Furthermore, the influence domain of heritage corridors should be further increased.

Suggested Citation

  • Tianxin Zhang & Yuliang Yang & Xin Fan & Shengya Ou, 2023. "Corridors Construction and Development Strategies for Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Study about the Yangtze River Economic Belt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-22, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13449-:d:1235402
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13449/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13449/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bin Feng & Yongchi Ma, 2023. "Network Construction for Overall Protection and Utilization of Cultural Heritage Space in Dunhuang City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Seulah Kim & Dong-uk Im & Jongoh Lee & Heejae Choi, 2019. "Utility of Digital Technologies for the Sustainability of Intangible Cultural Heritage (ICH) in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-19, November.
    3. Mo Chen & Jiacan Wang & Jing Sun & Fang Ye & Hongyan Zhang, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Distribution Characteristics of Intangible Cultural Heritage and Tourism Response in the Beijing–Hangzhou Grand Canal Basin in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-17, June.
    4. Qihang Qiu & Yifan Zuo & Mu Zhang, 2022. "Intangible Cultural Heritage in Tourism: Research Review and Investigation of Future Agenda," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, January.
    5. Claudia Patricia Maldonado-Erazo & María de la Cruz del Río-Rama & Erica Estefanía Andino-Peñafiel & José Álvarez-García, 2023. "Social Use through Tourism of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of the Amazonian Kichwa Nationality," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, February.
    6. Maria Goula & Jamie Vanucchi, 2022. "Sustained Change: Design Speculations on the Performance of Fallow-Scapes in Time along the Erie Canal National Heritage Corridor, (ECNHC), New York," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-22, January.
    7. Lan Yu, 2023. "Digital Sustainability of Intangible Cultural Heritage: The Example of the “Wu Leno” Weaving Technique in Suzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-16, June.
    8. Mengba Liu & Anlu Zhang & Xiong Zhang & Yanfei Xiong, 2022. "Research on the Game Mechanism of Cultivated Land Ecological Compensation Standards Determination: Based on the Empirical Analysis of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-29, September.
    9. Feiyang Lin & Xuan Zhang & Zhiyao Ma & Yifu Zhang, 2022. "Spatial Structure and Corridor Construction of Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Case Study of the Ming Great Wall," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-24, September.
    10. Qing Lin & Zheng Lian, 2018. "On Protection of Intangible Cultural Heritage in China from the Intellectual Property Rights Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-19, November.
    11. Chuanchuan Yuan & Li Gan & Huili Zhuo, 2022. "Coupling Mechanisms and Development Patterns of Revitalizing Intangible Cultural Heritage by Integrating Cultural Tourism: The Case of Hunan Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-16, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. He Zhang & Yutong Wang & Yu Qi & Siwei Chen & Zhengkai Zhang, 2024. "Assessment of Yellow River Region Cultural Heritage Value and Corridor Construction across Urban Scales: A Case Study in Shaanxi, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-21, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jie Chang & Cheng Long & Song Lu & Rui Han, 2022. "Does Government Positively Support the Spatial Distribution of ICH? Evidence of Data from the Yangtze Delta Region of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Yunxiang Ge & Cheng Lu & Han Gao, 2023. "Constructing an Indicator System for Cultural Sustainability in Chinese Cities under the Objective of Urban Renewal and Capability Measurement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-23, September.
    3. Teen-Hang Meen & Charles Tijus & Jui-Che Tu, 2019. "Selected Papers from the Eurasian Conference on Educational Innovation 2019," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Bo Zhu & Si-Qi Tian & Chien-Chih Wang, 2021. "Improving the Sustainability Effectiveness of Traditional Arts and Crafts Using Supply–Demand and Ordered Logistic Regression Techniques in Taiyuan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-14, October.
    5. Yang Jin & Bing Hou & Xiang Kong, 2024. "The Practice Characteristics of Authorized Heritage Discourse in Tourism: Thematic and Spatial," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20, June.
    6. Zihan Cai & Sidong Zhao & Mengshi Huang & Congguo Zhang, 2023. "Evolution Model, Mechanism, and Performance of Urban Park Green Areas in the Grand Canal of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-29, December.
    7. Xin Wang & Jingjing Lai & Yanlong Guo, 2024. "Study on Tourism Responsiveness and Habitat Environment-Influencing Factors of Traditional Villages in Huizhou Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-15, April.
    8. Jiayin Zhang & Min Wang & Yinbin Lin, 2024. "Evaluations of Guangzhou’s brand building through intangible cultural heritage: a brand equity model," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(2), pages 119-129, June.
    9. Yang Gao & Mengmeng Li & Qingning Li & Keji Huang & Shiwei Shen, 2022. "Inheritors’ Happiness and Its Relevant Factors in Intangible Cultural Heritage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-17, October.
    10. Ling Cao & Jie Yin, 2023. "Research on Sharing Behavior Strategy of Cultural Heritage Institutions Based on Evolutionary Game Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-23, June.
    11. Feiyang Lin & Xuan Zhang & Zhiyao Ma & Yifu Zhang, 2022. "Spatial Structure and Corridor Construction of Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Case Study of the Ming Great Wall," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-24, September.
    12. Yuqing Geng & Hongwei Zhu & Renjun Zhu, 2022. "Coupling Coordination between Cultural Heritage Protection and Tourism Development: The Case of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-22, November.
    13. Linling Geng & Li Zhou & Yifeng Zhang, 2023. "Analysis of Three-Way Game of Straw Return System under the Green Transformation of Agriculture," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-16, March.
    14. Weijun Hu & Mingxing Li & Xiaomeng Chi & Xinxing Wang & Asad Ullah Khan, 2024. "Intangible cultural heritage research in China from the perspective of intellectual property rights based on bibliometrics and knowledge mapping," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    15. Isabel Dominguez-Gaibor & Nicolae Talpă & Maria Cristina Bularca & Aureliu Florin Hălălișan & Claudiu Coman & Bogdan Popa, 2023. "Socioecological Dynamics and Forest-Dependent Communities’ Wellbeing: The Case of Yasuní National Park, Ecuador," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-19, December.
    16. Seulah Kim & Dong-uk Im & Jongoh Lee & Heejae Choi, 2019. "Utility of Digital Technologies for the Sustainability of Intangible Cultural Heritage (ICH) in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-19, November.
    17. May Newisar & Gehan Selim & Meng Li, 2024. "Place-Based Perspectives on Understanding the Value of Sustainable Heritage-Inspired Arts and Crafts in Jordan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-22, August.
    18. Danni Shen & Herui Guo & Linghui Yu & Jie Ying & Jie Shen & Shuchen Ying & Defu Bao & Ying Wang, 2022. "Sound Design of Guqin Culture: Interactive Art Promotes the Sustainable Development of Traditional Culture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, February.
    19. Silviu Butnariu, 2019. "Engineering eHeritage—A New Approach for Study of Intangible Cultural Heritage. Case Study: The Analysis of the Noise Produced by the Dacian Dracon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, April.
    20. Jung-Jung Chang & Ruey-Feng Chen & Chia-Li Lin, 2022. "Exploring the Driving Factors of Urban Music Festival Tourism and Service Development Strategies Using the Modified SIA-NRM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-27, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13449-:d:1235402. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.