IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i17p13139-d1230385.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Project and Portfolio Performance Assessment in Agile Software Development: A Data-Driven Scoring Model

Author

Listed:
  • Cristian Fagarasan

    (Design Engineering and Robotics Department, Machine Building Faculty, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 103-105 Muncii Avenue, 400641 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Ciprian Cristea

    (Electrical Machines and Drives Department, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 26-28 G. Barițiu Street, 400027 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Maria Cristea

    (Electrical Machines and Drives Department, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 26-28 G. Barițiu Street, 400027 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Ovidiu Popa

    (Design Engineering and Robotics Department, Machine Building Faculty, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 103-105 Muncii Avenue, 400641 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Adrian Pisla

    (Design Engineering and Robotics Department, Machine Building Faculty, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 103-105 Muncii Avenue, 400641 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

Abstract

In today’s rapidly evolving information technology sectors, agile methodologies have been employed by software development organizations to facilitate the large-scale, efficient, and swift development of digital products. Notably, it is a widely accepted principle that an increase in project delivery predictability results from more effective portfolio management. Despite the abundant resources within software engineering that address project management and agile development performance, the measurement of portfolio delivery performance integrating sustainability principles is under-researched. This paper aims to underline a solution to bridge this gap by proposing a data-driven scoring model explicitly designed for software firms to integrate sustainability metrics into their project and portfolio performance assessment. The model is primarily aimed at monitoring and enhancing delivery performance while also reinforcing the sustainability of the software development lifecycle. A thorough literature review was conducted to discern gaps in existing practices, followed by development of a scoring model melded with delivery and sustainability metrics seamlessly. Validated through a case study, the findings reveal that the model influences the performance and sustainability dynamics within software development entities. The insights gained from this study underscore the pivotal role of a harmonized delivery and sustainability metrics system in enhancing the sustainability and efficiency of software development undertakings.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristian Fagarasan & Ciprian Cristea & Maria Cristea & Ovidiu Popa & Adrian Pisla, 2023. "Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Project and Portfolio Performance Assessment in Agile Software Development: A Data-Driven Scoring Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-25, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:17:p:13139-:d:1230385
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/17/13139/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/17/13139/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anže Mihelič & Simon Vrhovec & Tomaž Hovelja, 2023. "Agile Development of Secure Software for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, January.
    2. Jason Leong & Kiu May Yee & Onalethata Baitsegi & Lingesvaran Palanisamy & R. Kanesaraj Ramasamy, 2023. "Hybrid Project Management between Traditional Software Development Lifecycle and Agile Based Product Development for Future Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-11, January.
    3. Gopalakrishnan Sriraman & Shriram Raghunathan, 2023. "A Systems Thinking Approach to Improve Sustainability in Software Engineering—A Grounded Capability Maturity Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-16, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Buerian Soongpol & Paniti Netinant & Meennapa Rukhiran, 2024. "Practical Sustainable Software Development in Architectural Flexibility for Energy Efficiency Using the Extended Agile Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-37, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alok Mishra & Yehia Ibrahim Alzoubi, 2023. "Structured software development versus agile software development: a comparative analysis," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 14(4), pages 1504-1522, August.
    2. Buerian Soongpol & Paniti Netinant & Meennapa Rukhiran, 2024. "Practical Sustainable Software Development in Architectural Flexibility for Energy Efficiency Using the Extended Agile Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-37, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:17:p:13139-:d:1230385. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.