IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i16p12335-d1216577.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of Computational Thinking through STEM Activities for the Promotion of Gender Equality

Author

Listed:
  • Ronald Paucar-Curasma

    (Grupo de Investigación TIC Aplicadas a la Sociedad, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Tayacaja Daniel Hernández Morillo, Pampas 09156, Peru)

  • Liszeth Paola Cerna-Ruiz

    (Grupo de Investigación TIC Aplicadas a la Sociedad, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Tayacaja Daniel Hernández Morillo, Pampas 09156, Peru)

  • Claudia Acra-Despradel

    (Vicerrectoría Proyectos de Investigación, Vinculación e Internacionalización, Universidad Nacional Pedro Henríquez Ureña, Santo Domingo 10100, Dominican Republic)

  • Klinge Orlando Villalba-Condori

    (Vicerrectorado de Investigación, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima 15024, Peru)

  • Luis Alberto Massa-Palacios

    (Facultad de Ingeniería Ambiental y Sanitaria, Universidad Nacional San Luis Gonzaga, Ica 11001, Peru)

  • Andrés Olivera-Chura

    (Facultad de Ingeniería Geológica y Metalúrgica, Universidad Nacional del Altiplano, Puno 21001, Peru)

  • Isabel Esteban-Robladillo

    (Facultad Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Nacional de Ucayali, Ucayali 25003, Peru)

Abstract

In the article, the authors evaluate the computational thinking skills according to gender of a group of male and female students of industrial engineering and systems engineering from universities located in the Andean region of Peru; the five key skills were evaluated: abstraction, decomposition, generalization, algorithmic design, and evaluation. To strengthen computational thinking, activities related to agriculture, livestock, the environment, safety, and education were proposed, which are of interest to the community where the students live. The research methodology followed is quasi-experimental of the post-test type with intentional non-probabilistic sampling. During the development of the activities, the students used microcontrollers, sensors, and actuators; thus, they also used block-based programming to implement hardware and software prototypes. The results have shown, according to the inferential analysis, that there are no significant differences between male and female students in any of the computational thinking skills. These results were due to the educational strategy applied in the development of STEM activities, which focused on solving real problems in the student community and generated the same enthusiasm in female and male students compared to other activities that only generated motivation in male students.

Suggested Citation

  • Ronald Paucar-Curasma & Liszeth Paola Cerna-Ruiz & Claudia Acra-Despradel & Klinge Orlando Villalba-Condori & Luis Alberto Massa-Palacios & Andrés Olivera-Chura & Isabel Esteban-Robladillo, 2023. "Development of Computational Thinking through STEM Activities for the Promotion of Gender Equality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-19, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12335-:d:1216577
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/16/12335/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/16/12335/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ting-Chia Hsu & Ching Chang & Lung-Hsiang Wong & Guat Poh Aw, 2022. "Learning Performance of Different Genders’ Computational Thinking," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-16, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12335-:d:1216577. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.