IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i16p12334-d1216537.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Belt and Road Initiative in Developing Countries: Lessons from Five Selected Countries in Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Agwot Komakech

    (Institute Research & Innovation Centre, Uganda Management Institute, Kampala P.O. Box 20131, Uganda
    Faculty of Business and Management Sciences, University of Nairobi, Nairobi P.O. Box 30197, Kenya)

  • Thomas Ogoro Ombati

    (Faculty of Business and Management Sciences, University of Nairobi, Nairobi P.O. Box 30197, Kenya)

Abstract

The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has become a household name for developing countries, especially in Africa. The BRI proposal by Chinese President Xi Jinping was positively received by many countries, including policymakers in China. In response, the Chinese Government committed to investing USD 1 trillion over ten years from 2013 to 2023. As a result, 152 countries signed a cooperation agreement with China to work under the BRI framework. The BRI has played a vital role in addressing the global infrastructures gap through the construction of modern highways, airports, high-speed railways, bridges, power generation (hydropower), and industrial parks. As a result, this has enhanced connectivity and economic growth between Asia, Europe, and Africa. Despite the BRI’s significant role in strengthening trade, infrastructure and investment links between China and other countries, there is limited literature on specific countries’ experience with the initiative. This study, therefore, will advance our understanding of the BRI, especially on the conceptualization of the term; comparative analysis of Africa–China relationships before and after the BRI; the benefits in relation to the “Five Connectivities” and the challenges the BRI is facing in Africa. The article is based on a literature review and case study as research methodologies mainly used the Policies, Projects, Initiatives, and Strategies (PPIS) as a data source. The study focuses on five African countries; Uganda, Kenya, Egypt, Djibouti, and Mozambique. These countries were selected purposefully for analysis because of their experience, long-term relationships with China, and strategic locations. The findings revealed that the BRI lacked a clear description and that it was difficult to distinguish between BRI projects and other regular economic or diplomatic relations. The study also identified four differences between Africa–China relationships before and after the BRI. Furthermore, the findings revealed that the BRI has positively contributed to all five connectivity pillars. However, the major challenges reported concerning the initiative from the various countries were: procurement corruption, low/lack of involvement of stakeholders, high compensation prices, labor violations, increasing debts, and environmental hazards. In conclusion, while the BRI has brought about significant infrastructure development and economic benefits, the project has also experienced some challenges. This study, therefore, contributes to the body of knowledge on China’s Belt and Road Initiative and its impact on African countries, specifically in Uganda, Kenya, Djibouti, Mozambique, and Egypt. The paper then provides conclusions and policy implications as well as future research opportunities in the current body of the literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Agwot Komakech & Thomas Ogoro Ombati, 2023. "Belt and Road Initiative in Developing Countries: Lessons from Five Selected Countries in Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-21, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12334-:d:1216537
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/16/12334/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/16/12334/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maliszewska,Maryla & Van Der Mensbrugghe,Dominique, 2019. "The Belt and Road Initiative : Economic, Poverty and Environmental Impacts," Policy Research Working Paper Series 8814, The World Bank.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yu-dong Zhang & Zhang-yuan Dai & Hui-long Zhang & Jia-qin Xie & Wen-qing Hu, 2024. "Consumer acceptance of different types of cultural borrowing and its internal mechanisms," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Weiping Li & Saite Lu, 2024. "Assessing Structural Transformation and the Potential Impacts of Belt and Road Initiative Projects in Africa," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 36(3), pages 548-570, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. de Soyres, François & Mulabdic, Alen & Ruta, Michele, 2020. "Common transport infrastructure: A quantitative model and estimates from the Belt and Road Initiative," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    2. Dylan Sutherland & John Anderson & Nicholas Bailey & Ilan Alon, 0. "Policy, institutional fragility, and Chinese outward foreign direct investment: An empirical examination of the Belt and Road Initiative," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 0, pages 1-24.
    3. Wang, Xueqin & Wong, Yiik Diew & Yuen, Kum Fai & Li, Kevin X., 2020. "Environmental governance of transportation infrastructure under Belt and Road Initiative: A unified framework," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 189-199.
    4. de Soyres, François & Mulabdic, Alen & Murray, Siobhan & Rocha, Nadia & Ruta, Michele, 2019. "How much will the Belt and Road Initiative reduce trade costs?," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 151-164.
    5. Ho, Chun-Yu & Narins, Thomas P. & Sung, Won, 2023. "Developing information and communication technology with the belt and road initiative and the digital silk road," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(10).
    6. Wang, Banban & Lin, Ping, 2022. "Whether China's overseas energy infrastructure projects dirtier or cleaner after the belt and road initiative?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    7. Dylan Sutherland & John Anderson & Nicholas Bailey & Ilan Alon, 2020. "Policy, institutional fragility, and Chinese outward foreign direct investment: An empirical examination of the Belt and Road Initiative," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 3(3), pages 249-272, September.
    8. Xin Cao & Peng Li & Shi Li & Heng Zhang & Mengni Qin, 2022. "The Belt and Road Initiative, Public Health Expenditure and Economic Growth: Evidence from Quasi-Natural Experiments," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-18, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12334-:d:1216537. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.