IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i15p12076-d1212093.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving Profitability Measurement: Impact of Intellectual Capital Efficiency on Return on Total Employed Resources in Smart and Knowledge-Intensive Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Bojan Krstić

    (Faculty of Economics, University of Niš, 18105 Niš, Serbia)

  • Ljiljana Bonić

    (Faculty of Economics, University of Niš, 18105 Niš, Serbia)

  • Tamara Rađenović

    (Faculty of Occupational Safety, University of Niš, 18000 Niš, Serbia)

  • Milica Jovanović Vujatović

    (Faculty of Economics, University of Niš, 18105 Niš, Serbia)

  • Jasmina Ognjanović

    (Faculty of Hotel Management and Tourism in Vrnjačka Banja, University of Kragujevac, 36210 Vrnjacka Banja, Serbia)

Abstract

This paper aims to emphasize the quantification of intellectual capital, not disclosed on the assets side of the balance sheet in the smart and knowledge-based enterprise, because it is very important for the more precise quantification of the profitability ratio, such as the return on assets (ROA). For this purpose, the paper suggests the EIC (efficiency of intellectual capital) methodology. It points out the necessity for the new profitability formula, gives methodological solutions for it, and investigates the impacts of intellectual capital (IC) efficiency indicators on traditional and new formulas of profitability in the case of knowledge-intensive and smart companies. The research confirms the importance of improving the profitability measurement in the knowledge economy era, where exists the dominance of intangible assets. It emphasizes the need for the correction of the denominator of the traditional ROA indicator. The comprehensive measurement of the total intellectual capital, especially its non-disclosed component in the balance sheet, provides information for more precise and accurate profitability measurements. The paper points out the issue of improving the traditional financial ratio, such as the ROA. This can be achieved by incorporating the value of intellectual resources, which are undisclosed in the balance sheet, in its denominator. This solution results in creating a new profitability indicator—return on total employed resources (EOR). This EOR indicator is more successful in capturing the enterprise’s intellectual performance compared with traditional profitability ROA indicators. This fact leads to the conclusion that EOR is better profitability indicator especially for smart and knowledge-intensive companies.

Suggested Citation

  • Bojan Krstić & Ljiljana Bonić & Tamara Rađenović & Milica Jovanović Vujatović & Jasmina Ognjanović, 2023. "Improving Profitability Measurement: Impact of Intellectual Capital Efficiency on Return on Total Employed Resources in Smart and Knowledge-Intensive Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-18, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:12076-:d:1212093
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/12076/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/12076/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nasiri, Mina & Ukko, Juhani & Saunila, Minna & Rantala, Tero, 2020. "Managing the digital supply chain: The role of smart technologies," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 96.
    2. Bojan Krstić & Ljiljana Bonić, 2016. "EIC: A New Tool for Intellectual Capital Performance Measurement," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2016(6), pages 723-741.
    3. Tzu-Shian Han & Carol Yeh-Yun Lin & Mavis Yi-Ching Chen, 2008. "Developing human capital indicators: a three-way approach," International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(3/4), pages 387-403.
    4. Guangchun Jin & Jian Xu, 2022. "Does Intellectual Capital Affect Financial Leverage of Chinese Agricultural Companies? Exploring the Role of Firm Profitability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, February.
    5. Prasojo Prasojo & Winwin Yadiati & Tettet Fitrijanti & Memed Sueb, 2022. "Cross-Region Comparison Intellectual Capital and Its Impact on Islamic Banks Performance," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-15, March.
    6. Radiojecic, Tamara & Krstic, Bojan, 2017. "Intellectual Capital in the Theory of the Firm," Ekonomika, Journal for Economic Theory and Practice and Social Issues, Society of Economists Ekonomika, Nis, Serbia, vol. 63(4), December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Voicu D. Dragomir, 2024. "The Impact of Intangible Capital on Firm Profitability in the Technology and Healthcare Sectors," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-25, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mina Nasiri & Minna Saunila & Tero Rantala & Juhani Ukko, 2022. "Sustainable innovation among small businesses: The role of digital orientation, the external environment, and company characteristics," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(4), pages 703-712, August.
    2. Zeng, Shouzhen & Zhou, Jiamin & Zhang, Chonghui & Merigó, José M., 2022. "Intuitionistic fuzzy social network hybrid MCDM model for an assessment of digital reforms of manufacturing industry in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    3. Bora Ly, 2024. "The Interplay of Digital Transformational Leadership, Organizational Agility, and Digital Transformation," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 4408-4427, March.
    4. Liu, Weihua & Long, Shangsong & Wei, Shuang, 2022. "Correlation mechanism between smart technology and smart supply chain innovation performance: A multi-case study from China's companies with Physical Internet," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    5. Ngoc Phu Tran & Co Thi Huyen Dinh & Hien Thi Thu Hoang & Duc Hong Vo, 2022. "Intellectual Capital and Firm Performance in Vietnam: The Moderating Role of Corporate Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-13, October.
    6. Syed Abdul Rehman Khan & Muhammad Waqas & Xue Honggang & Naveed Ahmad & Zhang Yu, 2022. "Adoption of innovative strategies to mitigate supply chain disruption: COVID-19 pandemic," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 1115-1133, December.
    7. Lepore, Dominique & Dolui, Koustabh & Tomashchuk, Oleksandr & Shim, Heereen & Puri, Chetanya & Li, Yuan & Chen, Nuoya & Spigarelli, Francesca, 2023. "Interdisciplinary research unlocking innovative solutions in healthcare," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    8. Maha Shehadeh & Ahmad Almohtaseb & Jehad Aldehayyat & Ibrahim A. Abu-AlSondos, 2023. "Digital Transformation and Competitive Advantage in the Service Sector: A Moderated-Mediation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    9. Stephanie Lu Wang & Yejee Lee & Dan Li, 2024. "Smart disclosure: an enabler for multinationals to reduce human rights violations in global supply chains," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 55(4), pages 450-469, June.
    10. Xiao Han & Menghan Zhang & Yixuan Hu & Yuan Huang, 2022. "Study on the Digital Transformation Capability of Cost Consultation Enterprises Based on Maturity Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-18, August.
    11. Jebum Pyun & Jin Sung Rha, 2021. "Review of Research on Digital Supply Chain Management Using Network Text Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-24, September.
    12. Miroslava Vlčková & Zuzana Frantíková & Jaroslav Vrchota, 2019. "Relationship between the Financial Indicators and the Implementation of Telework," DANUBE: Law and Economics Review, European Association Comenius - EACO, issue 1, pages 45-66, March.
    13. Stephanie Lu Wang, 2023. "Digital technology-enabled governance for sustainability in global value chains: a framework and future research agenda," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 50(1), pages 175-192, March.
    14. Muhammad Waqas Farooq & Faiza Nawaz & Dr. Raja Irfan Sabir, 2024. "To Gain Sustainable Competitive Advantages (SCA) Using Artificial Intelligence (AI) Over Competitors," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 13(2), pages 1026-1033.
    15. Li, Lixu & Ye, Fei & Zhan, Yuanzhu & Kumar, Ajay & Schiavone, Francesco & Li, Yina, 2022. "Unraveling the performance puzzle of digitalization: Evidence from manufacturing firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 54-64.
    16. AlNuaimi, Bader K. & Kumar Singh, Sanjay & Ren, Shuang & Budhwar, Pawan & Vorobyev, Dmitriy, 2022. "Mastering digital transformation: The nexus between leadership, agility, and digital strategy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 636-648.
    17. Gheorghe Minculete & Sebastian Emanuel Stan & Lucian Ispas & Ioan Virca & Leontin Stanciu & Marius Milandru & Gabriel Mănescu & Mădălina-Ioana Bădilă, 2022. "Relational Approaches Related to Digital Supply Chain Management Consolidation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-28, August.
    18. Jing-Yan Ma & Lei Shi & Tae-Won Kang, 2022. "The Effect of Digital Transformation on the Pharmaceutical Sustainable Supply Chain Performance: The Mediating Role of Information Sharing and Traceability Using Structural Equation Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-21, December.
    19. Zhi-Guang Li & Yanrui Wu & Yao-Kuang Li, 2023. "Technical Founders, Digital Transformation and Corporate Technological Innovation: Empirical Evidence from Listed Companies in China’s STAR Market," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 23-03, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    20. repec:aud:audfin:v:20:y:2018:i:49:p:631 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Chua, Celine & Li, Xue & Tan, Kim Hock & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2024. "Building sustainable performance in the maritime industry via digital resources and innovation," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 282-299.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:12076-:d:1212093. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.