IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i15p11805-d1207894.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ecological Risk Assessment and Impact Factor Analysis of Ecological Spatial Patterns in Coastal Counties: Taking Dalian Pulandian District as an Example

Author

Listed:
  • Ming Qu

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150000, China)

  • Yu Tian

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150000, China)

  • Bingxi Liu

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150000, China)

  • Dawei Xu

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150000, China)

Abstract

A scientific foundation for the sustainable development of ecosystems and the improvement of the ecological spatial security pattern in the area is provided by carrying out a scientific assessment of ecological risk levels in coastal counties. An ecological risk assessment model was established in Pulandian district, Dalian, based on four periods of land use data from 1990 to 2020 combined with the PSR model. The spatial and temporal evolution of ecological risk in Pulandian was analyzed on this basis, and an exploratory regression analysis and a geographically weighted regression model were then used to explore the driving role of natural and social factors on comprehensive ecological risk in coastal counties. The findings demonstrate that there is an obvious ecological landscape type of conversion, with the majority of arable land being converted to forest land in northcentral and southwest areas, reflecting an improvement in the ecological environment and air quality, and the majority of coastal beach land being converted to construction land among the volumes transferred out and in. The area of high risk increased by 73.17% during the course of 30 years, with the majority of it concentrated in the research areas southern Fengrong, Tiexi, and Taiping regions in 1990 before expanding to the northeast, southeast, and central regions. The status index and response index both show a decline followed by an increase in change, while the pressure index shows a rising tendency with socioeconomic progress. The comprehensive ecological risk in the study area is significantly influenced by the urbanization rate, the ratio of environmental protection investment to GDP, the ecosystem service index, and the ecological space–land use ratio, with the urbanization rate displaying more overt negative correlation-driving characteristics, the ratio of environmental protection investment to GDP displaying significant spatial division characteristics, and the ecological space–land use ratio being an important factor. The findings serve as a foundation for decisions on ecological risk avoidance, control, and construction in Pulandian.

Suggested Citation

  • Ming Qu & Yu Tian & Bingxi Liu & Dawei Xu, 2023. "Ecological Risk Assessment and Impact Factor Analysis of Ecological Spatial Patterns in Coastal Counties: Taking Dalian Pulandian District as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-18, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:11805-:d:1207894
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/11805/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/11805/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Han Zhang & Shiying Shi & Fangfang Zhao & Mingming Hu & Xiao Fu, 2024. "Integrated Benefits of Sustainable Utilization of Construction and Demolition Waste in a Pressure-State-Response Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-24, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:11805-:d:1207894. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.