IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i15p11657-d1204806.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Emissions Inventories to Cost Accounting: Making Business as Usual Visible for Climate Action Planning

Author

Listed:
  • Mary Ann Cunningham

    (Department of Earth Science and Geography, Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, NY 12604, USA)

  • Kate G. Leventhal

    (Urban Studies Program, Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, NY 12604, USA)

Abstract

Greenhouse gas (GHG) inventories are widely considered a first step toward climate mitigation and adaptation planning, but progress completing inventories at the local level is often slow. Local governments may lack motivation to carry out inventories when staffing and funding are tight. Articulating the current costs of energy consumption could motivate cash-limited local governments and help justify investments in alternatives. Calculating financial savings of alternatives could further motivate planning. Here we demonstrate an approach to calculate operating costs (and potential savings) for a town in southern New York, using measures of heat consumption and eGallons to calculate expenditures. We find that business-as-usual community energy cost amount to $50–$60 million per year in funds exported from the community, or $10,000–$12,000 per household. By replacing gasoline vehicles with electric vehicles and oil-burning furnaces with heat pumps, the community could save around $20–$33 million per year, or $4400–$7000 per household. Local government operations costs could decline by over $70,000 per year. For a small government, such reductions could have a substantial financial impact. Adding a cost assessment to a standard GHG inventory appears reasonably straightforward, and if implemented broadly, it could increase the speed and effectiveness of GHG inventories and climate action planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Mary Ann Cunningham & Kate G. Leventhal, 2023. "From Emissions Inventories to Cost Accounting: Making Business as Usual Visible for Climate Action Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-14, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:11657-:d:1204806
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/11657/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/11657/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shorna B. Allred & Allison M. Chatrchyan & Giorgi Tsintsadze, 2022. "Local municipal capacity for climate change action in New York State: Exploring the urban–rural divide," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 39(5), pages 570-601, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nils C. Bandelow & Johanna Hornung, 2022. "How communities and policy instruments govern sustainability," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 39(5), pages 538-540, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:11657-:d:1204806. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.