Author
Listed:
- Li Xu
(College of Forestry, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China)
- Hongyan Lai
(College of Forestry, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China)
- Jinge Yu
(College of Forestry, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China)
- Shaolong Luo
(College of Forestry, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China)
- Chaosheng Guo
(College of Forestry, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China)
- Yingqun Gao
(College of Forestry, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China)
- Wenwu Zhou
(College of Forestry, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China)
- Shuwei Wang
(College of Forestry, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China)
- Qingtai Shu
(College of Forestry, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China)
Abstract
The assessment of forest carbon storage plays a crucial role in forest management and ecosystem exploration, enabling the evaluation of forest quality, resources, carbon cycle and management. The Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) satellite provides a means to accurately measure these various forest vertical structure parameters by penetrating the forest canopy. However, the distribution of the footprint along the orbit track is heterogeneous and discontinuous, preventing the acquisition of spatially distributed carbon storage formation at the county level. Consequently, this study integrated GEDI and Landsat 9 data to estimate Quercus aquifolioides carbon storage in Shangri-La. By applying the Kriging interpolation to previously pretreated footprints, surface information from the GEDI L2B footprints was obtained. At the same time, Landsat 9 vegetation indices and band reflectance were extracted to analyze the correlation with the carbon storage of Quercus aquifolioides samples. Then, three methods (support vector machine, bagging, and random forest) were used to create a carbon storage estimation model for Shangri-La. The research results showed that (1) among the models for the selection of GEDI footprint parameters based on semi-variance, the optimal model of the digital_elevation_model was the spherical model, while the best model of percentage tree cover from the MODIS data (modis_treecover) and the foliage height diversity index (fhd_normal) was the exponential model. (2) Analyzing the thirty-three extracted independent variable factors correlated with the carbon storage of Quercus aquifolioides showed that the top five variables with the highest correlation were digital_elevation_model, modis_treecover, fhd_normal, DEM, and band 1 (B1). (3) After variable selection, the R 2 = 0.82 and RMSE = 11.92 t/hm 2 values of the Quercus aquifolioides carbon storage estimation model established via random forest were obtained, and its evaluation precision was superior to that of the support vector machine method and bagging regression. The carbon storage of Quercus aquifolioides was primarily in the range of 8.22~94.63 t/hm 2 , and the mean value was 42.44 t/hm 2 , while the total carbon storage was about 5,374,137.62 t. The findings from this paper illustrated the feasibility of obtaining carbon storage data on a county scale by combining GEDI LiDAR data with Landsat 9 optical data. The results also suggested a new perspective for combining GEDI L2B data with other remote sensing images to estimate other forest structure parameters.
Suggested Citation
Li Xu & Hongyan Lai & Jinge Yu & Shaolong Luo & Chaosheng Guo & Yingqun Gao & Wenwu Zhou & Shuwei Wang & Qingtai Shu, 2023.
"Carbon Storage Estimation of Quercus aquifolioides Based on GEDI Spaceborne LiDAR Data and Landsat 9 Images in Shangri-La,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-22, July.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:11525-:d:1202388
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:11525-:d:1202388. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.