IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i14p11182-d1196475.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Practices (IKSPs), Livelihood Resources and Aspirations of the Matigsalog and Ata Tribes

Author

Listed:
  • Erna S. Macusi

    (Milkfish Assessment Project, Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Davao Oriental State University (DOrSU), Mati City 8200, Davao Oriental, Philippines)

  • Anthony C. Sales

    (Department of Science and Technology (DOST-XI), Davao City 8000, Philippines)

  • Edison D. Macusi

    (Milkfish Assessment Project, Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Davao Oriental State University (DOrSU), Mati City 8200, Davao Oriental, Philippines)

  • Henzel P. Bongas

    (Milkfish Assessment Project, Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Davao Oriental State University (DOrSU), Mati City 8200, Davao Oriental, Philippines)

  • Melanie A. Cayacay

    (Milkfish Assessment Project, Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Davao Oriental State University (DOrSU), Mati City 8200, Davao Oriental, Philippines)

  • Juber L. Omandam

    (Milkfish Assessment Project, Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Davao Oriental State University (DOrSU), Mati City 8200, Davao Oriental, Philippines)

  • Marthje Schüler

    (Marine Biological Resources (IMBRSea), Ghent University, 9000 Gent, Belgium)

  • Camila Vidal

    (Marine Biological Resources (IMBRSea), Ghent University, 9000 Gent, Belgium)

Abstract

The Philippines is an archipelagic country composed of different indigenous cultural communities (ICCs) spread across various islands. Indigenous peoples (IP) often face marginalization and lack access to the same resources available in lowland areas, creating inequality and barriers to their well-being and development. This study documents the indigenous knowledge systems and practices of the Matigsalog and Ata tribes in Davao City, focusing on their unique agricultural techniques, rituals, and conservation practices. Furthermore, we assessed their current livelihood options and explored opportunities for government support to improve their well-being. A focus group discussion was used to assess the knowledge and perception of participants from the Matigsalog tribe (N = 42) and Ata tribe (N = 15) of Davao City. Validation of the study took place separately through a brief presentation of the results before 15 members of the tribes and a hiking visit to their farmlands. The study determined the existing livelihoods in the two areas, which were mainly agricultural, farming of crops (rice, corn, cassava, sweet potato) and fruit trees (coconut, banana, durian, jackfruit, pomelo) and the community’s resources as well as knowledge, systems, and practices with regard to agricultural crops including climate change. Their sustainable farming practices include intercropping, seed-saving, and exchange practices, preserving these crop varieties and ensuring their availability for future planting seasons, with no usage of chemical fertilizers and pesticides. In conclusion, the tribe’s aspirations and the resulting recommendations are consolidated to facilitate and enhance governmental assistance in a more focused and efficient manner.

Suggested Citation

  • Erna S. Macusi & Anthony C. Sales & Edison D. Macusi & Henzel P. Bongas & Melanie A. Cayacay & Juber L. Omandam & Marthje Schüler & Camila Vidal, 2023. "Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Practices (IKSPs), Livelihood Resources and Aspirations of the Matigsalog and Ata Tribes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-15, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:11182-:d:1196475
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/11182/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/11182/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ishwari Singh Bisht & Jai Chand Rana & Sudhir Pal Ahlawat, 2020. "The Future of Smallholder Farming in India: Some Sustainability Considerations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-25, May.
    2. Elson Ian Nyl E Galang & Philip Vaughter, 2020. "Generational Local Ecological Knowledge on the Benefits of an Agroforestry Landscape in Mindanao, Philippines," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development, Southeast Asian Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture (SEARCA), vol. 17(1), pages 89-108, June.
    3. Cardenas, Juan Camilo & Carpenter, Jeffrey, 2013. "Risk attitudes and economic well-being in Latin America," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 52-61.
    4. Galang, Elson Ian Nyl E. & Vaughter, Philip, 2020. "Generational Local Ecological Knowledge on the Benefits of an Agroforestry Landscape in Mindanao, Philippines," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development, Southeast Asian Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture (SEARCA), vol. 17(1), June.
    5. Masoud Yazdanpanah & Maryam Tajeri Moghadam & Moslem Savari & Tahereh Zobeidi & Stefan Sieber & Katharina Löhr, 2021. "The Impact of Livelihood Assets on the Food Security of Farmers in Southern Iran during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-18, May.
    6. Bo Zhong & Shuang Wu & Geng Sun & Ning Wu, 2022. "Farmers’ Strategies to Climate Change and Urbanization: Potential of Ecosystem-Based Adaptation in Rural Chengdu, Southwest China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-21, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dilshad Ahmad & Muhammad Afzal & Abdur Rauf, 2019. "Analysis of wheat farmers’ risk perceptions and attitudes: evidence from Punjab, Pakistan," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 95(3), pages 845-861, February.
    2. Moya, Andrés, 2018. "Violence, psychological trauma, and risk attitudes: Evidence from victims of violence in Colombia," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 15-27.
    3. de Courson, Benoît & Frankenhuis, Willem & Nettle, Daniel, 2024. "Poverty is associated with both risk avoidance and risk taking: an empirical test of the desperation threshold model," SocArXiv gqjkm, Center for Open Science.
    4. Alina Ferecatu & Ayse Önçüler, 2016. "Heterogeneous risk and time preferences," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 53(1), pages 1-28, August.
    5. Andrea Robbett & Michael K. Graham & Peter Hans Matthews, 2016. "Revenue Implications of Strategic and External Auction Risk," Games, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-18, January.
    6. Pagare, Dewang & Biswas, Indranil & Agrahari, Amit & Ghosh, Sriparna, 2023. "A small farmer’s market choice in the presence of multiple markets: The Indian case," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(2), pages 739-753.
    7. Zhixin Dai & Fabio Galeotti & Marie Claire Villeval, 2017. "The efficiency of crackdowns: a lab-in-the-field experiment in public transportations," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 82(2), pages 249-271, February.
    8. Le Thi Hoa Sen & Jennifer Bond & Pham Huu Ty & Le Thi Hong Phuong, 2022. "The Impacts of COVID-19 on Returned Migrants’ Livelihood Vulnerability in the Central Coastal Region of Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    9. Gloede, Oliver & Menkhoff, Lukas & Waibel, Hermann, 2015. "Shocks, Individual Risk Attitude, and Vulnerability to Poverty among Rural Households in Thailand and Vietnam," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 54-78.
    10. Faten Derouez & Adel Ifa, 2024. "Sustainable Food Security: Balancing Desalination, Climate Change, and Population Growth in Five Arab Countries Using ARDL and VECM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-25, March.
    11. Aniseh S. Bro, 2020. "Climate Change Adaptation, Food Security, and Attitudes toward Risk among Smallholder Coffee Farmers in Nicaragua," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-17, August.
    12. Astrid Hopfensitz & César Mantilla & Josepa Miquel-Florensa, 2019. "Catch Uncertainty and Reward Schemes in a Commons Dilemma: An Experimental Study," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 72(4), pages 1121-1153, April.
    13. Ubfal, Diego, 2016. "How general are time preferences? Eliciting good-specific discount rates," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 150-170.
    14. Francesco Bogliacino & Iván González-Gallo, 2015. "Aspirations, Prospect Theory and entrepreneurship: evidence from Colombia," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 62(3), pages 271-290, September.
    15. Zhixin Dai & Fabio Galeotti & Marie Claire Villeval, 2018. "Cheating in the Lab Predicts Fraud in the Field: An Experiment in Public Transportation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(3), pages 1081-1100, March.
    16. Strobl, Renate, 2022. "Background risk, insurance and investment behaviour: Experimental evidence from Kenya," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 34-68.
    17. Henri E. Z. Tonnang & Bonoukpoè Mawuko Sokame & Mark Wamalwa & Saliou Niassy & Beatrice Wambui Muriithi, 2023. "System Dynamics Modeling for Assessing the Impact of COVID-19 on Food Supply Chains: A Case Study of Kenya and Rwanda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-19, March.
    18. François-Charles Wolff, 2020. "The intergenerational transmission of risk attitudes: Evidence from Burkina Faso," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 181-206, March.
    19. Mulwa, Chalmers & Visser, Martine & Gitonga, Zachary, 2019. "Weather Uncertainty and Demand for Information in Agricultural Technology Adoption: The Case of Namibia," EfD Discussion Paper 19-25, Environment for Development, University of Gothenburg.
    20. Carpenter, Jeffrey & Hans Matthews, Peter & Robbett, Andrea, 2017. "Compensating differentials in experimental labor markets," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 50-60.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:11182-:d:1196475. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.