IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i14p10942-d1192578.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pedagogy in Teaching through English Medium Instruction—Academics’ Cases in a Chinese University

Author

Listed:
  • Wanting Sun

    (School of Education, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia)

  • Jinghe Han

    (School of Education, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia)

  • Christina Curry

    (School of Education, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia)

  • Kay Carroll

    (School of Education, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia)

Abstract

As a result of two decades of development, the trajectory of English medium instruction (EMI) research has moved from the identification of problems towards a focus on pedagogy. In response to studies in the literature claiming that the dominant approach in EMI pedagogy is the direct transmission of knowledge, and calls for research investigating classroom discourse in EMI teaching, this study explores the pedagogical features enacted by bilingual EMI academics in a Chinese university’s EMI program. The participants were four academics who were teaching a subject in parallel across both EMI and CMI student cohorts. The research employs Paulo Freire’s framework of dialogic teaching as the theoretical lens and focused on investigating moments in which the EMI lecturers ‘dialogued’, engaged, and/or interacted with students in their EMI classes. This research found that, in spite of their varied disciplines, the lecturers mostly implemented expository teaching in their EMI and CMI classes in general. The efforts of individual academics in relation to intellectual equality, the wellbeing of students, and the encouragement of critical thinking through dialogue and interaction were identified. However, due to the academics positioning themselves as experts in subject knowledge, the tendency in their teaching was characterized as monologic rather than dialogic. This research contests a major theme in the literature, which is that the academics’ English (EMI teaching), in reference to their first language (L1), is not the major contributor to their pedagogical approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Wanting Sun & Jinghe Han & Christina Curry & Kay Carroll, 2023. "Pedagogy in Teaching through English Medium Instruction—Academics’ Cases in a Chinese University," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-16, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:10942-:d:1192578
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/10942/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/10942/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Murod Ismailov & Thomas K. F. Chiu & Julie Dearden & Yukiko Yamamoto & Nigora Djalilova, 2021. "Challenges to Internationalisation of University Programmes: A Systematic Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative Research on Learner-Centred English Medium Instruction (EMI) Pedagogy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-40, November.
    2. Haijiao Chen & Jinghe Han & David Wright, 2020. "An Investigation of Lecturers’ Teaching through English Medium of Instruction—A Case of Higher Education in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-16, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhicheng Zeng & Wenjun Zhong & Shumaila Naz, 2023. "Can Environmental Knowledge and Risk Perception Make a Difference? The Role of Environmental Concern and Pro-Environmental Behavior in Fostering Sustainable Consumption Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-23, March.
    2. Shih-Ling Lin & Tzu-Hsing Wen & Gregory S. Ching & Yu-Chen Huang, 2021. "Experiences and Challenges of an English as a Medium of Instruction Course in Taiwan during COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-21, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:10942-:d:1192578. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.