IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i11p8985-d1162533.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deformation-Based Basal Heave Reliability Analysis and Selection on Monitoring Points for General Braced Excavations

Author

Listed:
  • Kaiqi Meng

    (School of Civil Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266033, China)

  • Guangming Yu

    (School of Civil Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266033, China)

  • Liang Li

    (School of Civil Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266033, China)

  • Zhen Xu

    (Qingdao Metro Line 1 Co., Ltd., Qingdao 266045, China)

  • Jun Lei

    (Engineering Bureau Co., Ltd., China State Construction, Changsha 410007, China)

  • Yanxiang Fan

    (The Fifth Engineering Co., Ltd., China Railway 25th Bureau Group, Qingdao 266101, China)

  • Hongbiao Yu

    (Tunnel Engineering Co., Ltd., China Communications Construction, Beijing 100024, China)

  • Liang Xu

    (School of Civil Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266033, China)

Abstract

A framework for evaluating deformation-based basal heave stability is proposed in order to distinguish between the different responses under freely developed and prohibited basal heave failures. In the case of freely developed basal heave failure, the maximum deformation values occur at the center point of pit bottom, whereas this is not the case for the prohibited basal heave failure. The critical thickness of soft soil layer between the end of supporting structures and the top of hard stratum is about 0.3 B ( B = excavation width), beyond which the freely developed basal heave failure arises. In situations otherwise, the prohibited basal heave failure occurs. The failure probability of basal heave failure at the center point increases significantly as B ranges within a limited value; then, it begins to decrease or to vary slightly at a certain value under a given thickness of soft soil layer. If the thickness of soft soil layer is so sufficiently large that freely developed basal heave failure occurs for any of B, the failure probability of basal heave failure at the center point increases as B increases. The selection of the optimum monitoring points for basal heave stability is recommended to account for the weights in the contribution to the basal heave deformations of the influencing factors such as excavation width and thickness of soft soil layer. The proposed framework is applicable to basal heave reliability analysis for braced excavations where deformation values are focused.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaiqi Meng & Guangming Yu & Liang Li & Zhen Xu & Jun Lei & Yanxiang Fan & Hongbiao Yu & Liang Xu, 2023. "Deformation-Based Basal Heave Reliability Analysis and Selection on Monitoring Points for General Braced Excavations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-19, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:8985-:d:1162533
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/8985/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/8985/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chunli Li & Guangming Yu & Liang Li & Hongbiao Yu & Yanxiang Fan & Jun Lei & Zhen Xu, 2023. "Reliability Analysis of Seismic Slope Incorporating Interactions among Multiple Sliding Blocks Using Imbalance Thrust Force Method in Primary Sliding Direction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-16, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:8985-:d:1162533. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.