IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i10p7989-d1146392.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial Analysis of Tertiary Industry Evolution Based on Gravity Model: A Case of Central Plains Economic Region in China

Author

Listed:
  • Qian Li

    (School of Information Engineering, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang 453003, China)

  • Jianping Wang

    (School of Information Engineering, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang 453003, China)

  • Guohong Gao

    (School of Information Engineering, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang 453003, China)

  • Yingying Lv

    (School of Information Engineering, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang 453003, China)

  • Zhiyu Li

    (School of Information Engineering, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang 453003, China)

  • Guanglan Chen

    (School of Information Engineering, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang 453003, China)

Abstract

The service and knowledge economy has emerged as the primary drivers of national economic growth, with the tertiary industry leading the way. To promote growth in the central plain region and achieve structural convergence of industries for sustainable, rapid, and healthy economic development, conducting a spatial structural analysis of the evolution of the industrial structure is essential. However, traditional statistical analysis needs to keep pace with the dynamic and non-linear relationships within and outside industries. In this paper, we propose a novel spatial analysis method based on the gravity model to examine the tertiary industry in China’s central plains economic region (CPER). By analyzing statistical data from 2018 to 2022, our results reveal that the economic linkage intensity (F-value) of the tertiary industry in CPER has increased over the years. Specifically, F-values for the high-end, general, and other service industries are 2815, 9882, and 14,826, respectively. The network density (D-value) indicates a single-core structure, with D-values of 0.71, 0.74, and 0.82 for high-end, general, and other service industries. Our findings suggest that the economic linkage network of the tertiary industry in CPER has matured, with solid industry integration and convergence of the regional financial industry structure. There is a high correlation ( p < 0.01) among various network structures in the service industry, and a stable and cohesive subgroup with multicentre characteristics is beginning to emerge. These findings provide valuable insights for the development of the tertiary industry in CPER during the later stage of the 14th Five-Year Plan in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Qian Li & Jianping Wang & Guohong Gao & Yingying Lv & Zhiyu Li & Guanglan Chen, 2023. "Spatial Analysis of Tertiary Industry Evolution Based on Gravity Model: A Case of Central Plains Economic Region in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-22, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:7989-:d:1146392
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/7989/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/7989/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Wei-Bin, 2016. "Economic Globalization and Interregional Agglomeration in a Multi-Country and Multi-Regional Neoclassical Growth Model," INVESTIGACIONES REGIONALES - Journal of REGIONAL RESEARCH, Asociación Española de Ciencia Regional, issue 34, pages 95-121.
    2. Weihao Shi & Jian Tian & Aihemaiti Namaiti & Xiaoxu Xing, 2022. "Spatial-Temporal Evolution and Driving Factors of the Coupling Coordination between Urbanization and Urban Resilience: A Case Study of the 167 Counties in Hebei Province," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-27, October.
    3. François Perroux, 1950. "Economic Space: Theory and Applications," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 64(1), pages 89-104.
    4. Xinhua Zhu & Qianli Wang & Peifeng Zhang & Yunjiang Yu & Lingling Xie, 2021. "Optimizing the spatial structure of urban agglomeration: based on social network analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 683-705, April.
    5. Muhammad, Sulaman & Pan, Yanchun & Agha, Mujtaba Hassan & Umar, Muhammad & Chen, Siyuan, 2022. "Industrial structure, energy intensity and environmental efficiency across developed and developing economies: The intermediary role of primary, secondary and tertiary industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    6. Lianchun Zhao & Chengzhang Zhao & Jiajing Huang, 2022. "Spatial Dynamics and Determinants of Population Urbanization in the Upper Reaches of the Yellow River," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-12, August.
    7. Haisheng Chen & Shuiping Zhu & Jianjun Sun & Kaiyang Zhong & Manhong Shen & Xiaoli Wang, 2022. "A Study of the Spatial Structure and Regional Interaction of Agricultural Green Total Factor Productivity in China Based on SNA and VAR Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-17, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ma, Shiyu & Gao, Yuguo & Li, Hui, 2024. "Digital economic, resource curse and the development of low-carbon transformation," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arun Natarajan Hariharan & Arindam Biswas, 2020. "A Critical review of the Indian knowledge‐based industry location policy against its theoretical arguments," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(3), pages 431-454, June.
    2. Olena Borodina & Ihor Prokopa & Serhiy Kyryziuk & Viktor Yarovyi, 2020. "Rural Areas Development Fund as a Financial Instrument for Spatial Justice in Land Use and Sustainable Rural Development," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 3, pages 122-130, September.
    3. Namahoro, J.P. & Wu, Q. & Su, H., 2023. "Wind energy, industrial-economic development and CO2 emissions nexus: Do droughts matter?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    4. Kozyrevа Оlena & Sahaidak-Nikitiuk Rita & Yevtushenko Viktoriia & Derenskaya Yana & Ievtushenko Ganna, 2017. "Research of the level of socio-economic development of Ukrainian regions," Technology audit and production reserves, 4(36) 2017, Socionet;Technology audit and production reserves, vol. 4(5(36)), pages 4-15.
    5. Maciej Jagódka & Małgorzata Snarska, 2021. "The State of Human Capital and Innovativeness of Polish Voivodships in 2004–2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-20, November.
    6. Rafael Morais Pereira & Ana Cláudia Azevedo & Fabio Emanuel Farago & Felipe Mendes Borini, 2024. "Technological intensity and local socio‐economic development," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(2), pages 1043-1057, March.
    7. Jacques Poot & Bill Cochrane & Sandra Baxendine, 2005. "Description and Spatial Analysis of Employment Change in New Zealand Regions 1986-2001," Population Studies Centre Discussion Papers dp-57, University of Waikato, Te Ngira Institute for Population Research.
    8. Haisheng Chen & Manhong Shen, 2022. "Do Central Inspections of Environmental Protection Affect the Efficiency of the Green Economy? Evidence from China’s Yangtze River Delta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    9. Lilla Knop, 2019. "Development of Clusters in Poland," International Journal of Innovation and Economic Development, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 5(5), pages 15-25, December.
    10. Li, Tianyu & Yue, Xiao-Guang & Waheed, Humayun & Yıldırım, Bilal, 2023. "Can energy efficiency and natural resources foster economic growth? Evidence from BRICS countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    11. Rinaldo Evangelista & Simona Iammarino & Valeria Mastrostefano & Alberto Silvani, 2002. "Looking for Regional Systems of Innovation: Evidence from the Italian Innovation Survey," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(2), pages 173-186.
    12. Oleksii Voronkov & Daria Serogina & Hanna Bazetska & Natalia Skliaruk, 2018. "Sustainable Development of the Region: The Spatial Dimension," RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA', FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(1), pages 11-24.
    13. Salman, Muhammad & Long, Xingle & Wang, Guimei & Zha, Donglan, 2022. "Paris climate agreement and global environmental efficiency: New evidence from fuzzy regression discontinuity design," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    14. Fang, Shuya & Fang, Wei, 2023. "How fiscal decentralization and trade diversification influence sustainable development: Moderating role of resources dependency," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    15. Shu-hen Chiang, 2018. "Assessing the Merits of the Urban-Led Policy in China: Spread or Backwash Effect?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-14, February.
    16. Jan Lambooy, 2010. "The Evolution of Spatial Patterns over Long Time-Horizons: The Relation with Technology and Economic Development," Chapters, in: Ron Boschma & Ron Martin (ed.), The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography, chapter 22, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    17. Sergey Kovalenko & Natalia Bykovets, 2022. "Support For Cluster Initiatives And Cluster Policy (Case Study Of The Euroregion "The Lower Danube")," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 8(1).
    18. Sergey Kovalenko & Natalia Bykovets & Olena Kolmykova, 2021. "The "Lower Danube" Euroregion: Development Emergence Of The Environmental Management Cluster Forms," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 7(3).
    19. Gao, Kang & Yuan, Yijun, 2022. "Government intervention, spillover effect and urban innovation performance: Empirical evidence from national innovative city pilot policy in China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    20. Ma, Wen & Fang, Zhuoqiong & Zhang, Xiangfeng, 2023. "Comparative analysis of structural characteristics of China's 18 typical urban agglomerations based on flows of various elements," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 479(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:7989-:d:1146392. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.