IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2022i1p729-d1021318.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deliverable Wellhead Temperature—A Feasibility Study of Converting Abandoned Oil/Gas Wells to Geothermal Energy Wells

Author

Listed:
  • Na Wei

    (State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China)

  • Boyun Guo

    (Department of Petroleum Engineering, University of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA 70504, USA)

Abstract

Many oil/gas wells are abandoned or approaching their end-of-life. Converting them into geothermal wells can significantly improve the economics of oil/gas field operations and reduce carbon emissions. While such conversion has proven viable in some areas, this technology has not yet been considered in many other areas. It is highly desirable to investigate the feasibility of converting abandoned oil/gas wells into geothermal energy production wells in local geological conditions. A new mathematical model was developed in this study for analyzing the feasibility of converting oil/gas wells into geothermal wells. This model predicts the deliverable fluid temperature of a well by simulating the heat transfer from the geothermal zone through the wellbore to the surface wellhead, considering pipe and wellbore insulation. Factors affecting heat transfer efficiency were investigated with the model for a generic data set. Results indicate that without pipe insulation, the temperature of the returning fluid is very close to that of the injected fluid. The use of pipe insulation can significantly increase the temperature of the returning fluid. For a system with a thermal conductivity of insulation pipe Kp = 0.03 W/m-C, the deliverable fluid temperature can be increased from 30 °C to 124 °C. Adding an insulation cement sheath can efficiently further increase the temperature of the returning fluid. For a system with a cement thermal conductivity of 0.20 W/m-C, the deliverable fluid temperature can be further increased from 124 °C to 148 °C. Increasing the length of the horizontal wellbore in the geothermal zone from 2000 m to 8000 m can further increase the temperature of the returning fluid from 148 °C to 159 °C. Merely by increasing the vertical depth of the well from 7000 m to 7800 m, the deliverable fluid temperature can be enhanced from 148 °C to 161 °C. However, vertical depth is limited by the temperature-sensitivity of drilling technologies, such as the thermal stability of drilling fluids and downhole drilling instruments.

Suggested Citation

  • Na Wei & Boyun Guo, 2022. "Deliverable Wellhead Temperature—A Feasibility Study of Converting Abandoned Oil/Gas Wells to Geothermal Energy Wells," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:729-:d:1021318
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/729/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/729/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bu, Xianbiao & Ma, Weibin & Li, Huashan, 2012. "Geothermal energy production utilizing abandoned oil and gas wells," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 80-85.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zheng, Jianqiao & Zhang, Yanjun & Huang, Yibin & Liu, Qiangbin & Cheng, Yuxiang & Guo, Jixiang, 2024. "Numerical investigation on heat transfer performance of the segmented cementing coaxial heat exchanger," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    2. Kuan-Lin Chen & Kuan-Yu Luo & Pratik Prakash Gupta & Shung-Wen Kang, 2023. "SLM Additive Manufacturing of Oscillating Heat Pipe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-19, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kurnia, Jundika C. & Putra, Zulfan A. & Muraza, Oki & Ghoreishi-Madiseh, Seyed Ali & Sasmito, Agus P., 2021. "Numerical evaluation, process design and techno-economic analysis of geothermal energy extraction from abandoned oil wells in Malaysia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 868-879.
    2. Hu, Xincheng & Banks, Jonathan & Wu, Linping & Liu, Wei Victor, 2020. "Numerical modeling of a coaxial borehole heat exchanger to exploit geothermal energy from abandoned petroleum wells in Hinton, Alberta," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 1110-1123.
    3. Nian, Yong-Le & Cheng, Wen-Long, 2018. "Insights into geothermal utilization of abandoned oil and gas wells," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 44-60.
    4. Sun, Fengrui & Yao, Yuedong & Li, Guozhen & Li, Xiangfang, 2018. "Geothermal energy extraction in CO2 rich basin using abandoned horizontal wells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 760-773.
    5. Xie, Kun & Nian, Yong-Le & Cheng, Wen-Long, 2018. "Analysis and optimization of underground thermal energy storage using depleted oil wells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1006-1016.
    6. Cheng, Wen-Long & Liu, Jian & Nian, Yong-Le & Wang, Chang-Long, 2016. "Enhancing geothermal power generation from abandoned oil wells with thermal reservoirs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 537-545.
    7. C, Alimonti & P, Conti & E, Soldo, 2019. "A comprehensive exergy evaluation of a deep borehole heat exchanger coupled with a ORC plant: the case study of Campi Flegrei," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    8. Hu, Xincheng & Banks, Jonathan & Guo, Yunting & Liu, Wei Victor, 2021. "Retrofitting abandoned petroleum wells as doublet deep borehole heat exchangers for geothermal energy production—a numerical investigation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 115-134.
    9. Alimonti, C. & Soldo, E. & Bocchetti, D. & Berardi, D., 2018. "The wellbore heat exchangers: A technical review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 353-381.
    10. Shejiao Wang & Jiahong Yan & Feng Li & Junwen Hu & Kewen Li, 2016. "Exploitation and Utilization of Oilfield Geothermal Resources in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-13, September.
    11. Luo, Yongqiang & Xu, Guozhi & Cheng, Nan, 2021. "Proposing stratified segmented finite line source (SS-FLS) method for dynamic simulation of medium-deep coaxial borehole heat exchanger in multiple ground layers," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 604-624.
    12. Cheng, Sharon W.Y. & Kurnia, Jundika C. & Ghoreishi-Madiseh, Seyed Ali & Sasmito, Agus P., 2019. "Optimization of geothermal energy extraction from abandoned oil well with a novel well bottom curvature design utilizing Taguchi method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    13. Li, Chao & Jiang, Chao & Guan, Yanling & Chen, Hao & Yang, Ruitao & Wan, Rong & Shen, Lu, 2023. "Comparison of the experimental and numerical results of coaxial-type and U-type deep-buried pipes’ heat transfer performances," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 95-106.
    14. Martina Tuschl & Tomislav Kurevija, 2023. "Revitalization Modelling of a Mature Oil Field with Bottom-Type Aquifer into Geothermal Resource—Reservoir Engineering and Techno-Economic Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-27, September.
    15. Ouyang, Mingwei & Cao, Yan, 2023. "Utilizations of reaction exothermic heat to compensate the cost of the permanent CO2 sequestration through the geological mineral CO2 carbonation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    16. Cui, Guodong & Ren, Shaoran & Zhang, Liang & Ezekiel, Justin & Enechukwu, Chioma & Wang, Yi & Zhang, Rui, 2017. "Geothermal exploitation from hot dry rocks via recycling heat transmission fluid in a horizontal well," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 366-377.
    17. Aydin, Hakki & Merey, Sukru, 2021. "Potential of geothermal energy production from depleted gas fields: A case study of Dodan Field, Turkey," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1076-1088.
    18. Nian, Yong-Le & Cheng, Wen-Long, 2018. "Evaluation of geothermal heating from abandoned oil wells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 592-607.
    19. Ma, Yuanyuan & Li, Shibin & Zhang, Ligang & Liu, Songze & Wang, Ming, 2023. "Heat extraction performance evaluation of U-shaped well geothermal production system under different well-layout parameters and engineering schemes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 473-484.
    20. Leitch, Aletta & Haley, Brendan & Hastings-Simon, Sara, 2019. "Can the oil and gas sector enable geothermal technologies? Socio-technical opportunities and complementarity failures in Alberta, Canada," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 384-395.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:729-:d:1021318. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.