IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i9p5736-d811756.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Balancing Street Functionality and Restorative Benefit: Developing an Expectation–Current Approach to Street Design

Author

Listed:
  • Yuting Yin

    (College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai 200070, China)

  • Kevin Thwaites

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK)

  • Yuhan Shao

    (College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai 200070, China)

Abstract

The importance of creating a better living environment that is conducive to public health has become increasingly prominent in the post-epidemic era. The restorative potential of urban streets has been emphasized recently, as these spaces of our everyday lives may provide people with restorative experiences. However, there is still no efficient way of delivering restorative street design, because no specific standard has been set to indicate the form such streets should take. A street has limited spaces but multiple uses; hence, the delivery of restorativeness is largely restricted by street contexts. This research proposes that this standard should be determined by the balance between street functions and restorative benefits. An expectation-current approach that involves street functions, street typologies, restorative evaluations and users’ expectations was developed in conjunction with its application to four pairs of streets. Each pair included one typical street type determined by its inherent function, and one corresponding case-study street. The restorative expectations and the streets’ current levels of restorativeness were evaluated, and their differences were used to indicate how and to what degree street-related restorative benefits should be optimized. Restorative design implications of the four case-study streets were then summarized accordingly. The expectation–current approach not only serves as a rigorous and sustainable method by stressing the balance between street functions and restorativeness, but also has the potential for application in broader assessment studies, especially when multiple environmental qualities need to be considered, with the advantage of the extensive involvement of people.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuting Yin & Kevin Thwaites & Yuhan Shao, 2022. "Balancing Street Functionality and Restorative Benefit: Developing an Expectation–Current Approach to Street Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5736-:d:811756
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5736/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5736/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Le Zhang & Xiaoxiao Xu & Yanlong Guo, 2022. "Comprehensive Evaluation of the Implementation Effect of Commercial Street Quality Improvement Based on AHP-Entropy Weight Method—Taking Hefei Shuanggang Old Street as an Example," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Yuting Yin & Yuhan Shao & Yifan Wang & Liuxi Wu, 2023. "Developing a Pocket Park Prescription Program for Human Restoration: An Approach That Encourages Both People and the Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(17), pages 1-19, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5736-:d:811756. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.