IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i9p5258-d803121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Objective Comparison of Achievement Motivation and Competitiveness among Semi-Professional Male and Female Football Players

Author

Listed:
  • Ricardo de la Vega

    (School of Education, Autonomus University of Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain)

  • Jorge Gómez

    (Health Economy Motricity and Education (HEME), Faculty of Sport Science, University of Extremadura, 10003 Caceres, Spain)

  • Raquel Vaquero-Cristobal

    (Faculty of Sport Science, Catholic University San Antonio of Murcia, 30007 Murcia, Spain)

  • Javier Horcajo

    (Department of Social Psychology and Methodology, Autonomous University of Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain)

  • Lucía Abenza-Cano

    (Faculty of Sport Science, Catholic University San Antonio of Murcia, 30007 Murcia, Spain)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine differences in achievement motivation (measured with the Objective Achievement Motivation Test, OLMT, Schuhfried ® ) and competitiveness between male and female semi-professional football players. The OLMT objectively assessed three constructs regarding achievement motivation: motivation through personal goals, aspiration level, and motivation through competition. In addition, competitiveness was measured with the self-reported Competitiveness-10 Questionnaire. Finally, participants’ performance was assessed by three expert observers in each of ten matches. Thirty-eight football players (men = 27; women = 11) participated in the present study, and no significant differences were found in the Levene test when comparing men and women with respect to the scores obtained in the different measures used in our research. Significant differences were found in the motivation through competition ( p = 0.021) as well as in self-reported competitiveness ( p = 0.020) as a function of gender, with males showing higher values in both cases. No gender differences were found in aspiration level ( p = 0.283) or motivation through personal goals ( p = 0.897). Moreover, age and player performance did not modulate gender differences on any measures. No significant correlation was found between motivational measures and performance. In conclusion, it should be noted that the only variable on which gender differences emerged was the level of competitiveness, such that males scored higher than females on both objective and self-reported measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Ricardo de la Vega & Jorge Gómez & Raquel Vaquero-Cristobal & Javier Horcajo & Lucía Abenza-Cano, 2022. "Objective Comparison of Achievement Motivation and Competitiveness among Semi-Professional Male and Female Football Players," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-9, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5258-:d:803121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5258/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5258/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dennis Murr & Philip Feichtinger & Paul Larkin & Donna O‘Connor & Oliver Höner, 2018. "Psychological talent predictors in youth soccer: A systematic review of the prognostic relevance of psychomotor, perceptual-cognitive and personality-related factors," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-24, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hasan Uday & Clemente Filipe Manuel, 2021. "Relationship Between Passing and Ball Control in Soccer: Analysis of Variations of Kinematic Measures," Polish Journal of Sport and Tourism, Sciendo, vol. 28(1), pages 3-7, March.
    2. Honorato J. Ginés & Florentino Huertas & Tomás García Calvo & Jose Carlos Ponce-Bordón & António J. Figueiredo & Rafael Ballester, 2023. "Age and Maturation Matter in Youth Elite Soccer, but Depending on Competitive Level and Gender," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-18, January.
    3. Dominika Wilczyńska & Tamara Walczak-Kozłowska & David Alarcón & Dominika Zakrzewska & Jose Carlos Jaenes, 2022. "Dimensions of Athlete-Coach Relationship and Sport Anxiety as Predictors of the Changes in Psychomotor and Motivational Welfare of Child Athletes after the Implementation of the Psychological Workshop," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-13, March.
    4. Souhail Hermassi & Thomas Bartels & Lawrence D. Hayes & René Schwesig, 2022. "Fitness, Fatness, and Academic Attainment in Male Schoolchildren from a Soccer Academy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-14, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5258-:d:803121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.