IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i8p4679-d793391.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Properties of Concrete with Recycled Aggregates Giving a Second Life to Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Bottom Ash Concrete

Author

Listed:
  • Aneeta Mary Joseph

    (Magnel-Vandepitte Laboratory for Structural Engineering and Building Materials, Ghent University, 9052 Ghent, Belgium
    Strategic Initiative Materials (SIM vzw), Project ASHCEM within the Program “MaRes”, 9052 Ghent, Belgium)

  • Stijn Matthys

    (Magnel-Vandepitte Laboratory for Structural Engineering and Building Materials, Ghent University, 9052 Ghent, Belgium)

  • Nele De Belie

    (Magnel-Vandepitte Laboratory for Structural Engineering and Building Materials, Ghent University, 9052 Ghent, Belgium)

Abstract

Economic and environmental factors call for increased resource productivity. Partial or full replacement of Portland cement by wastes and by-products, and natural aggregates by construction and demolition wastes, are two prominent routes of achieving circular economy in construction and related industries. Municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) bottom ashes have been found to be suitable to be used as a supplementary cementitious material (SCM) after various treatments. This paper reports a brief literature review on optimum use of recycled aggregates in concrete and an experimental study using replacement of natural aggregate by demolished concrete having MSWI bottom ash as partial replacement of Portland cement, and compares its properties to that of completely natural aggregate concrete. Additional water was added as a compensation for the water absorption by the recycled aggregate during the first 30 min of water contact during concrete mixing. Also the fine fraction of crushed concrete (<250 µm) was removed to reduce the ill-effects of using recycled aggregate. The replacement of aggregates was limited to 23% by weight of natural aggregate. The results prove environmentally safe and comparable performance of concrete including recycled aggregate with bottom ash to that of natural aggregate concrete.

Suggested Citation

  • Aneeta Mary Joseph & Stijn Matthys & Nele De Belie, 2022. "Properties of Concrete with Recycled Aggregates Giving a Second Life to Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Bottom Ash Concrete," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-16, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:8:p:4679-:d:793391
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/8/4679/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/8/4679/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tam, Vivian W.Y. & Tam, C.M. & Le, K.N., 2007. "Removal of cement mortar remains from recycled aggregate using pre-soaking approaches," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 82-101.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Husnain Haider & Sulaiman Yousef AlMarshod & Saleem S. AlSaleem & Ahmed AbdelMonteleb M. Ali & Majed Alinizzi & Mohammad T. Alresheedi & Md. Shafiquzzaman, 2022. "Life Cycle Assessment of Construction and Demolition Waste Management in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-17, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Noushin Islam & Malindu Sandanayake & Shobha Muthukumaran & Dimuth Navaratna, 2024. "Review on Sustainable Construction and Demolition Waste Management—Challenges and Research Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-30, April.
    2. Anna M. Grabiec & Jeonghyun Kim & Andrzej Ubysz & Pilar Bilbao, 2021. "Some Remarks towards a Better Understanding of the Use of Concrete Recycled Aggregate: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Haseog Kim & Sangki Park & Hayong Kim, 2016. "The Optimum Production Method for Quality Improvement of Recycled Aggregates Using Sulfuric Acid and the Abrasion Method," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-14, July.
    4. Daniele Kulisch & Amnon Katz & Semion Zhutovsky, 2022. "Quantification of Residual Unhydrated Cement Content in Cement Pastes as a Potential for Recovery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-24, December.
    5. Tam, Vivian W.Y. & Le, Khoa N., 2007. "Aggregate testing using 2nd-, 7th- and 10th-order interpolation polynomials," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 39-57.
    6. Wijayasundara, Mayuri & Mendis, Priyan & Zhang, Lihai & Sofi, Massoud, 2016. "Financial assessment of manufacturing recycled aggregate concrete in ready-mix concrete plants," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 187-201.
    7. Heng Wu & Xibin Liu & Xirui Ma & Guifeng Liu, 2024. "Effects of Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes and Recycled Fine Aggregates on the Multi-Generational Cycle Properties of Reactive Powder Concrete," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-17, March.
    8. Lotfi, Somayeh & Deja, Jan & Rem, Peter & Mróz, Radosław & van Roekel, Eric & van der Stelt, Hans, 2014. "Mechanical recycling of EOL concrete into high-grade aggregates," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 117-125.
    9. Ayman Abdo & Ayman El-Zohairy & Yasser Alashker & Mohamed Abd El-Aziz Badran & Sayed Ahmed, 2024. "Effect of Treated/Untreated Recycled Aggregate Concrete: Structural Behavior of RC Beams," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-28, May.
    10. Yuh-Shan Ho, 2019. "Comment on Chen, J.; Su, Y.; Si, H.; Chen, J. Managerial Areas of Construction and Demolition Waste: A Scientometric Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15 , 2350," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-4, May.
    11. Ting Wang & Kaiyi Li & Defu Liu & Yang Yang & Dong Wu, 2022. "Estimating the Carbon Emission of Construction Waste Recycling Using Grey Model and Life Cycle Assessment: A Case Study of Shanghai," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-16, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:8:p:4679-:d:793391. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.