Author
Listed:
- Kodigal A. Gopinath
(ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture (CRIDA), Hyderabad 500 059, India)
- Gandhamanagenahalli A. Rajanna
(ICAR-Directorate of Groundnut Research (DGR), Regional Station, Ananthapur 515 001, India)
- Govindarajan Venkatesh
(ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture (CRIDA), Hyderabad 500 059, India)
- Mitnala Jayalakshmi
(Regional Agricultural Research Station (RARS), Acharya NG Ranga Agricultural University, Nandyal 518 501, India)
- Venugopalan Visha Kumari
(ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture (CRIDA), Hyderabad 500 059, India)
- Mathyam Prabhakar
(ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture (CRIDA), Hyderabad 500 059, India)
- Bollam Rajkumar
(ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture (CRIDA), Hyderabad 500 059, India)
- Gajjala Ravindra Chary
(ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture (CRIDA), Hyderabad 500 059, India)
- Vinod Kumar Singh
(ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture (CRIDA), Hyderabad 500 059, India)
Abstract
Organic agriculture’s economic benefits and widespread adoption are well documented, but its impact on soil C dynamics in rainfed regions of semiarid tropics is less understood. The use of organic amendments in organic farming not only supply nutrients but also have the potential to contribute to soil carbon sequestration. Carbon storage and various soil organic pools are affected differently by various crops and production systems. A study was conducted with three crops (sunflower, pigeonpea, and greengram) under three production systems (control, organic and integrated) to assess the effect on soil C stocks, carbon sequestration potential, and crop yield. After seven years of experiment, pigeonpea ( Cajanus cajan L.) cultivation improved soil bulk density, porosity and water holding capacity compared to greengram [ Vigna radiata (L) Wilczek] and sunflower ( Helianthus annuus L.). Furthermore, plots under pigeonpea cultivation being on par with greengram had 15.6% higher total C (113.52 Mg C ha −1 ), 14% higher easily oxidizable organic C (17.5 Mg C ha −1 ) and C sequestration rate of 1.22 Mg C ha −1 yr −1 compared to sunflower. Among the three production systems, plots under organic management had significantly lower bulk density and higher water holding capacity and porosity at all of the profile depths compared to integrated production system and control. Similarly, organic production system being on par with integrated production system improved the easily oxidizable, oxidizable and weakly oxidizable organic C fractions at different soil depths compared to control. The C sequestration rate ranged from 0.21 to 0.85 Mg C ha −1 yr −1 in organic production systems compared to negligible rate (0.01–0.04 Mg ha −1 yr −1 ) in the plots under control. On average, integrated production system being on par with organic management recorded significantly higher pigeonpea equivalent seed yield (886 kg ha −1 ) compared to control (792 kg ha −1 ). These results suggest the potential of organic production system in improving soil properties, C sequestration, and crop yields in semiarid rainfed areas.
Suggested Citation
Kodigal A. Gopinath & Gandhamanagenahalli A. Rajanna & Govindarajan Venkatesh & Mitnala Jayalakshmi & Venugopalan Visha Kumari & Mathyam Prabhakar & Bollam Rajkumar & Gajjala Ravindra Chary & Vinod Ku, 2022.
"Influence of Crops and Different Production Systems on Soil Carbon Fractions and Carbon Sequestration in Rainfed Areas of Semiarid Tropics in India,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-15, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:4207-:d:785293
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:4207-:d:785293. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.