IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i7p3937-d780361.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Restoring Mexican Tropical Dry Forests: A National Review

Author

Listed:
  • Natalia Mesa-Sierra

    (Centro Interdisciplinario para la Formación y Vinculación Social, Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Occidente, Tlaquepaque 45604, Jalisco, Mexico)

  • Marinés de la Peña-Domene

    (Centro Interdisciplinario para la Formación y Vinculación Social, Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Occidente, Tlaquepaque 45604, Jalisco, Mexico
    Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City 04510, Mexico)

  • Julio Campo

    (Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City 04510, Mexico)

  • Christian P. Giardina

    (USDA Forest Service, Institute of Pacific Islands Forestry, Hilo, HI 96720, USA)

Abstract

Deforestation is the dominant threat to tropical dry forests (TDFs) in Mexico. Its causes include agriculture, tourism, and mining. In some cases, unassisted forest regeneration is sufficient to return diverse forest cover to a site, but in other cases, changes in land use are so severe that active restoration is required to reintroduce tree cover. The ecological and social constraints on TDF restoration in Mexico are poorly understood. To address this knowledge gap, we synthesized relevant restoration literature for Mexico published between January 1990 and February 2020. We examined 43 unique articles about TDF restoration practices in Mexico to identify (1) the national distribution of TDF restoration projects, (2) restoration objectives, and (3) factors contributing to TDF restoration success or failure. The largest number of restoration sites were in the Yucatan Peninsula, and the most common objective was to restore dry forest vegetation on lands that had been used for agriculture or impacted by fires. Planting seedlings was the most widely reported restoration strategy, and plant survival was the most frequently monitored response variable. Maximum annual temperature and the Lang Aridity Index were the best predictors of plant survival, which ranged from 15% to 78%. This synthesis highlights how national restoration inventories can facilitate the development of a restoration evaluation framework to increase the efficacy of restoration investments.

Suggested Citation

  • Natalia Mesa-Sierra & Marinés de la Peña-Domene & Julio Campo & Christian P. Giardina, 2022. "Restoring Mexican Tropical Dry Forests: A National Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-22, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:3937-:d:780361
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/3937/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/3937/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ian M. Ware & Rebecca Ostertag & Susan Cordell & Christian P. Giardina & Lawren Sack & Camila D. Medeiros & Faith Inman & Creighton M. Litton & Thomas Giambelluca & Grace P. John & Christine Scoffoni, 2022. "Multi-Stemmed Habit in Trees Contributes Climate Resilience in Tropical Dry Forest," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-16, June.
    2. Cynthia Simmons & Marta Astier & Robert Walker & Jaime Fernando Navia-Antezana & Yan Gao & Yankuic Galván-Miyoshi & Dan Klooster, 2023. "Forest Transition and Fuzzy Environments in Neoliberal Mexico," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, April.
    3. Julio Campo & Christian P. Giardina & Rodolfo Dirzo, 2023. "Tropical Dry Forest Restoration in an Era of Global Change: Ecological and Social Dimensions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-5, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:3937-:d:780361. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.