IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i7p3830-d778819.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Street Tree Diversity, Structure and Protection in Planned and Unplanned Neighborhoods of Lubumbashi City (DR Congo)

Author

Listed:
  • Yannick Useni Sikuzani

    (Ecology, Ecological Restoration and Landscape Unit, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Lubumbashi, Lubumbashi 1825, Democratic Republic of the Congo)

  • Alex Mpibwe Kalenga

    (Ecology, Ecological Restoration and Landscape Unit, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Lubumbashi, Lubumbashi 1825, Democratic Republic of the Congo)

  • Jonas Yona Mleci

    (Ecology, Ecological Restoration and Landscape Unit, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Lubumbashi, Lubumbashi 1825, Democratic Republic of the Congo)

  • Dieudonné N’Tambwe Nghonda

    (Ecology, Ecological Restoration and Landscape Unit, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Lubumbashi, Lubumbashi 1825, Democratic Republic of the Congo)

  • François Malaisse

    (Biodiversity and Landscape Unit, Gembloux Agro-BioTech, University of Liège, 5030 Gembloux, Belgium)

  • Jan Bogaert

    (Biodiversity and Landscape Unit, Gembloux Agro-BioTech, University of Liège, 5030 Gembloux, Belgium)

Abstract

Street trees are always considered a vital part of urban green infrastructure in urbanized areas through mitigating the negative effects caused by urbanization taking part in human well-being. However, little is still known about their diversity, structure and protection, mostly in Lubumbashi city in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DR Congo), where the pace of urbanization is not only rapid but also unplanned. In this study, using an inventory, we have characterized the diversity, structure and protection measures of street trees along a land-use planning gradient in Lubumbashi for both planned and unplanned neighborhoods. From the results, a total of 1596 trees were encountered, comprising 40 species, 33 genera and 17 families, mostly dominated by exotic species (65%). In addition, most of the studied trees (63%) belonged to four species only ( Jacaranda mimosifolia , Leucaena leucocephala , Mangifera indica , and Acacia auriculiformis ) with Leucaena leucocephala and Jacaranda mimosifolia being highly represented in unplanned and planned neighborhoods, respectively. The most abundant diameter classes in the planned neighborhoods were those with at most 10 cm against the classes larger than 50 cm in the planned neighborhoods. In both neighborhoods, trees with protection equipment represent less than 35%. Furthermore, in planned neighborhoods notably, nearly half of the observed equipment is in a good condition. Despite the benefits associated with street trees, there is a need to reduce the proportion of exotic tree species by planting native utilitarian tree species.

Suggested Citation

  • Yannick Useni Sikuzani & Alex Mpibwe Kalenga & Jonas Yona Mleci & Dieudonné N’Tambwe Nghonda & François Malaisse & Jan Bogaert, 2022. "Assessment of Street Tree Diversity, Structure and Protection in Planned and Unplanned Neighborhoods of Lubumbashi City (DR Congo)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-19, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:3830-:d:778819
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/3830/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/3830/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rizwana Alam & Jon C. Lovett, 2019. "Prospects of Public Participation in the Planning and Management of Urban Green Spaces in Lahore: A Discourse Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-28, June.
    2. Sang Seup Kim & Jae-Song Lee & Dong Hak Lee & Yeol Choi, 2021. "Citizens’ Preference and Perception of Street Trees of Main Boulevards in Busan, South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Joseph Bigirimana & Charles De Cannière & Jan Bogaert & Marie Josée Bigendako & Ingrid Parmentier, 2012. "Domestic garden plant diversity in Bujumbura, Burundi: Role of the socio-economical status of the neighborhood and alien species invasion risk," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/184419, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    4. Bertrand F. Nero & Nana Afranaa Kwapong & Raymond Jatta & Oluwole Fatunbi, 2018. "Tree Species Diversity and Socioeconomic Perspectives of the Urban (Food) Forest of Accra, Ghana," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-19, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Henri Kabanyegeye & Yannick Useni Sikuzani & Kouagou Raoul Sambieni & Didier Mbarushimana & Tatien Masharabu & Jan Bogaert, 2023. "Analysis of Anthropogenic Disturbances of Green Spaces along an Urban–Rural Gradient of the City of Bujumbura (Burundi)," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-14, February.
    2. Arsene Mushagalusa Balasha & Benjamin Murhula Balasha & Lebon Hwali Masheka & Dominique Aganze Mulume & Sage Weremubi Mwisha & Vianney Mulema Ngabo & Alexander-Armand Amatcho & Aloise Bitagirwa Ndele , 2022. "Students’ Willingness to Plant Trees and Pay for Their Maintenance on Campuses in the Democratic Republic of Congo," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-18, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Park, Mi Sun & Shin, Seongmin & Lee, Haeun, 2021. "Media frames on urban greening in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    2. Thiago Almeida Vieira & Thomas Panagopoulos, 2020. "Urban Forestry in Brazilian Amazonia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-19, April.
    3. Jingxiong Huang & Jiaqi Liang & Mengsheng Yang & Yuan Li, 2022. "Visual Preference Analysis and Planning Responses Based on Street View Images: A Case Study of Gulangyu Island, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Zongxiang Wang & Tianhao Chen & Wei Li & Kai Zhang & Jianwu Qi, 2023. "Construction and Demonstration of the Evaluation System of Public Participation Level in Urban Planning Based on the Participatory Video of ‘General Will—Particular Will’," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, January.
    5. Salman D. Al-Kofahi & Amani M. Al-Kafawin & Mohammad M. Al-Gharaibeh, 2024. "Investigating domestic gardens landscape plant diversity, implications for valuable plant species conservation," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(8), pages 21259-21279, August.
    6. Pistón, Nuria & Silva Filho, Dario S.E. & Dias, André T.C., 2022. "Social inequality deeply affects people’s perception of ecosystem services and disservices provided by street trees," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    7. Mónica Andrade & Cláudia Fernandes & António Coutinho & Albano Figueiredo, 2023. "Urban Green Infrastructure: Does Species’ Origin Impair Ecosystem Services Provision?," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, December.
    8. Alessio Russo & Giuseppe T. Cirella, 2018. "Modern Compact Cities: How Much Greenery Do We Need?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-15, October.
    9. Yuki Arai & Maswadi & Shenny Oktoriana & Anita Suharyani & Didik & Makoto Inoue, 2021. "How Can We Mitigate Power Imbalances in Collaborative Environmental Governance? Examining the Role of the Village Facilitation Team Approach Observed in West Kalimantan, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-24, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:3830-:d:778819. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.