IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i6p3600-d774666.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of How Energy Companies Pledge and Attempt to Reduce Their Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Line with National Targets on Climate Change: A Case Study of the Petroleum Authority of Thailand (PTT)

Author

Listed:
  • Edoardo Sperone

    (School of Earth and Environmental Science, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia)

  • Paul Dargusch

    (School of Earth and Environmental Science, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia)

  • Genia Hill

    (School of Earth and Environmental Science, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia)

Abstract

While climate change is increasingly more present in political agendas, companies are called to restructure their businesses to meet national targets by reducing their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Thus, carbon management practices are nowadays critical for most firms, especially those working in the energy sector. PTT represents a peculiar case in this field because it is a state-owned company that in the last few years accounted for 157.83 MtCO 2 e per year, though it has not yet taken significant action to reduce its emissions. As Thailand pledged to abate 20% of its GHG emissions within 2030, PTT set out its Climate Change Management plan, yet this still does not contain specific measures or projects that the company intends to undertake to meet the target. This paper thus provides estimations regarding the alternatives available to PTT by applying current academic literature and knowledge on PTT’s reduction plan, and by integrating it and verifying it with data retrieved from PTT’s competitors’ reduction plans. It was found that PTT could cover 6–10 MtCO 2 e per year at the cost of USD 5–10 per tCO 2 e by continuing to fund REDD+ projects. Moreover, investing in renewable energy leads to a reduction of 21.7 MtCO 2 e per year at the cost of USD 2.85 billion. Lastly, it was shown that PTT could obtain a reduction of 3 MtCO 2 e per year by implementing CCUS technologies, potentially at a lower cost compared with the current USD 20–25 per tCO 2 e abated. This paper also discusses the long-term market implications of each of these alternatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Edoardo Sperone & Paul Dargusch & Genia Hill, 2022. "Analysis of How Energy Companies Pledge and Attempt to Reduce Their Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Line with National Targets on Climate Change: A Case Study of the Petroleum Authority of Thailand (PTT)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-10, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:6:p:3600-:d:774666
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/6/3600/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/6/3600/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lena Klaaßen & Christian Stoll, 2021. "Harmonizing corporate carbon footprints," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Shi, Xueqiang & Chen, Xiaokun & Zhang, Yutao & Zhang, Yuanbo & Guo, Ruizhi & Zhao, Tenglong & Liu, Rui, 2022. "Numerical simulation of coal dust self–ignition and combustion under inclination conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PC).
    3. Doda, Baran & Gennaioli, Caterina & Gouldson, Andy & Grover, David & Sullivan, Rory, 2015. "Are corporate carbon management practices reducing corporate carbon emissions?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 60816, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Qingliang Tang & Le Luo, 2014. "Carbon Management Systems and Carbon Mitigation," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 24(1), pages 84-98, March.
    5. Foxon, Timothy J., 2011. "A coevolutionary framework for analysing a transition to a sustainable low carbon economy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(12), pages 2258-2267.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Ruonan & Lu, Feng & Xu, Jun & Chen, Kai & Zhao, Xiaoli, 2023. "Effect of carbon information disclosure with consistent evaluation standards: An empirical study about carbon efficiency label in Huzhou China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    2. Hall, Stephen & Foxon, Timothy J., 2014. "Values in the Smart Grid: The co-evolving political economy of smart distribution," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 600-609.
    3. Foxon, Timothy J., 2013. "Transition pathways for a UK low carbon electricity future," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 10-24.
    4. Hall, Stephen & Roelich, Katy, 2016. "Business model innovation in electricity supply markets: The role of complex value in the United Kingdom," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 286-298.
    5. Andrei, Mariana & Rohdin, Patrik & Thollander, Patrik & Wallin, Johanna & Tångring, Magnus, 2024. "Exploring a decarbonization framework for a Swedish automotive paint shop," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    6. Aldona Standar & Agnieszka Kozera & Łukasz Satoła, 2021. "The Importance of Local Investments Co-Financed by the European Union in the Field of Renewable Energy Sources in Rural Areas of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-23, January.
    7. Stefano Clo' & Gianluca Iannucci & Alessandro Tampieri, 2024. "Emission permits and firms' environmental responsibility," Working Papers - Economics wp2024_06.rdf, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Economia e l'Impresa.
    8. Dwi Ratmono & Darsono Darsono & Selviana Selviana, 2021. "Effect of Carbon Performance, Company Characteristics and Environmental Performance on Carbon Emission Disclosure: Evidence from Indonesia," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(1), pages 101-109.
    9. Xiao, Hua & Valera-Medina, Agustin & Bowen, Philip J, 2017. "Study on premixed combustion characteristics of co-firing ammonia/methane fuels," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 125-135.
    10. Binh Bui & Carolyn Fowler, 2022. "Carbon controls in a New Zealand electricity utility: An application of theoretical triangulation," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(4), pages 4423-4451, December.
    11. Gouriéroux, C. & Monfort, A. & Renne, J.-P., 2022. "Required Capital for Long-Run Risks," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    12. Trinks, Arjan & Ibikunle, Gbenga & Mulder, Machiel & Scholtens, Bert, 2017. "Greenhouse Gas Emissions Intensity and the Cost of Capital," Research Report 17017-EEF, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    13. Zengkai Zhang & Jiaoyan Li & Dabo Guan, 2023. "Value chain carbon footprints of Chinese listed companies," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-9, December.
    14. Hassan Qudrat-Ullah & Mark McCarthy Akrofi & Aymen Kayal, 2020. "Analyzing Actors’ Engagement in Sustainable Energy Planning at the Local Level in Ghana: An Empirical Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-20, April.
    15. Foxon, Timothy J. & Pearson, Peter J.G. & Arapostathis, Stathis & Carlsson-Hyslop, Anna & Thornton, Judith, 2013. "Branching points for transition pathways: assessing responses of actors to challenges on pathways to a low carbon future," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 146-158.
    16. Røpke, Inge, 2020. "Econ 101—In need of a sustainability transition," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    17. Tesfaye T. Lemma & Mehrzad Azmi Shabestari & Martin Freedman & Mthokozisi Mlilo, 2020. "Corporate carbon risk exposure, voluntary disclosure, and financial reporting quality," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(5), pages 2130-2143, July.
    18. Anderson, Blake & M'Gonigle, Michael, 2012. "Does ecological economics have a future?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 37-48.
    19. Gutiérrez-López, Cristina & Castro, Paula & Tascón, María T., 2022. "How can firms' transition to a low-carbon economy affect the distance to default?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    20. Fouquet, Roger, 2016. "Lessons from energy history for climate policy: technological change, demand and economic development," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 67785, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:6:p:3600-:d:774666. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.