Author
Listed:
- Chathuranganee Jayakody
(Global Disaster Resilience Centre, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK)
- Chamindi Malalgoda
(Global Disaster Resilience Centre, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK)
- Dilanthi Amaratunga
(Global Disaster Resilience Centre, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK)
- Richard Haigh
(Global Disaster Resilience Centre, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK)
- Champika Liyanage
(School of Engineering, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK)
- Emlyn Witt
(Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Tallinn University of Technology, 12616 Tallinn, Estonia)
- Mo Hamza
(Division of Risk Management and Societal Safety, Lund University, Box 117, SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden)
- Nishara Fernando
(Social Policy Analysis and Research Centre, University of Colombo, Colombo 00700, Sri Lanka)
Abstract
A cohesive society is not only characterised by the availability of basic services and facilities, but also promotes economic equality and inclusion, democracy, and social solidarity. Forced displacement due to disasters and conflict constantly disrupt the path to a sustainable and cohesive society. Displaced communities often struggle with a lack of access to livelihood and a lack of financial independence and social and family stability. With these challenges, a lack of provision of basic services and facilities will create a competition for housing, health, and education between the displaced and host communities. Additionally, the economic competition for jobs and the role of international aid in terms of fairness create social tension between the displaced and the host. Likewise, multiple aspects weaken the social cohesion between displaced and host communities. Within this context, we investigated approaches to enhance social cohesion following disaster-induced and conflict-induced displacement. With the identification of this research need, the research team of the project titled REGARD (REbuild-inG AfteR Displacement) conducted 47 in-depth interviews in four partner countries (U.K., Sweden, Estonia, and Sri Lanka) with community representatives, social support networks, agency networks, officials, etc. Moreover, focus group discussions were conducted with community members in Sri Lanka. The collected data were analysed through a qualitative data analysis procedure. The findings present eight approaches to strengthen the social cohesion between displaced and host communities. These eight approaches include the adequate provision of basic services and facilities without limiting the capacity of the host, support services aimed at local integration, economic integration between the displaced and host, and social cohesion through the built environment.
Suggested Citation
Chathuranganee Jayakody & Chamindi Malalgoda & Dilanthi Amaratunga & Richard Haigh & Champika Liyanage & Emlyn Witt & Mo Hamza & Nishara Fernando, 2022.
"Approaches to Strengthen the Social Cohesion between Displaced and Host Communities,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-15, March.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:6:p:3413-:d:771065
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Asuamah Yeboah, Samuel, 2024.
"Assessing Climate Change Impacts on Food Security in Africa: Regional Variations and Socio-Economic Perspectives,"
MPRA Paper
120918, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 18 Apr 2024.
- Andrew Carmichael & Felix Villalba-Romero & Champika Liyanage, 2022.
"Rebuilding after Displacement: A Skills Competency Audit of Built Environment Professional Documentation,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-27, November.
- Batara Surya & Patmawaty Taibe & Syahrul Sariman & Hernita Hernita & Agus Salim & Nasrullah Nasrullah & Arie Gunawan Hazairin Zubair, 2023.
"Renewable Energy Utilization and Environmental Pollution Control in the New City Area Mamminasata Metropolitan, Indonesia,"
International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(1), pages 213-226, January.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:6:p:3413-:d:771065. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.