IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i6p3149-d766234.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Household Solid WasteManagement in the Dominican Republic: Case of the Municipality of Puñal, Santiago

Author

Listed:
  • Edian F. Franco

    (Research and Innovation Department, Instituto de Innovación en Biotecnología e Industria (IIBI), Santo Domingo 10135, Dominican Republic
    Department of Basic and Environmental Sciences, Instituto Tecnologico de Santo Domingo (INTEC), Santo Domingo 10602, Dominican Republic
    Department of Research and Scientific Dissemination, Universidad Abierta para Adultos (UAPA), Santiago De Los Caballeros 51000, Dominican Republic)

  • Wilfredo Padrón Iglesia

    (Department of Research and Scientific Dissemination, Universidad Abierta para Adultos (UAPA), Santiago De Los Caballeros 51000, Dominican Republic)

  • Karina Pérez Teruel

    (Department of Research and Scientific Dissemination, Universidad Abierta para Adultos (UAPA), Santiago De Los Caballeros 51000, Dominican Republic)

Abstract

One of the biggest problems that the Dominican Republic has had in recent decades is the efficient management of solid domestic waste. This problem has worsened in recent years due to the decrease in available areas for the construction of sanitary landfills, the lack of recycling culture in the population, the deficiency in waste collection, and the scarce legal controls aimed at preserving water, air and soil among other factors. The objective of this study is to explore the management of solid waste by the population and the municipality of Puñal, province of Santiago, to evaluate and analyze the situation and generation of solid waste, municipal solid waste management services, and the attitudes of the population regarding recycling projects and waste management. A total of 275 households from 29 localities in the municipality of Puñal were surveyed, which allowed for a significant population sample. According to the results, the most significant type of waste produced by families is organic waste, followed by plastic waste and paper. Of the total organic waste produced in the municipality, 53% of solids wastes are handled through the municipal waste collection system, while 47% is used as plant fertilizers or animal feed. On the other hand, most households receive the municipal waste collection service and pay for this service, through which the municipal government collects, processes, and deposits the waste in different landfills. However, a more efficient waste collection system and the development of programs and projects that allow households to manage the solid waste efficiently they produce would be necessary.

Suggested Citation

  • Edian F. Franco & Wilfredo Padrón Iglesia & Karina Pérez Teruel, 2022. "Household Solid WasteManagement in the Dominican Republic: Case of the Municipality of Puñal, Santiago," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-13, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:6:p:3149-:d:766234
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/6/3149/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/6/3149/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vhuthu Ndou & Isaac Tebogo Rampedi, 2022. "Bibliometric Analysis of Municipal Solid Waste Management Research: Global and South African Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Zulfiya E. Bayazitova & Javier Rodrigo-Ilarri & María-Elena Rodrigo-Clavero & Aigul S. Kurmanbayeva & Natalya M. Safronova & Anargul S. Belgibayeva & Sayagul B. Zhaparova & Gulim E. Baikenova & Anuarb, 2022. "Relevance of Environmental Surveys on the Design of a New Municipal Waste Management System on the City of Kokshetau (Kazakhstan)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-15, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:6:p:3149-:d:766234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.