IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i5p3008-d764144.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Groundwater in Crisis? Addressing Groundwater Challenges in Michigan (USA) as a Template for the Great Lakes

Author

Listed:
  • Alan D. Steinman

    (Annis Water Resources Institute, Grand Valley State University, Muskegon, MI 49441, USA)

  • Donald G. Uzarski

    (Institute for Great Lakes Research, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI 48859, USA)

  • David P. Lusch

    (Institute of Water Research, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48823, USA)

  • Carol Miller

    (Civil and Environmental Engineering, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202, USA)

  • Patrick Doran

    (The Nature Conservancy, Lansing, MI 48906, USA)

  • Tom Zimnicki

    (Environmental Stewardship Division, Michigan Department of Rural and Agricultural Development, Lansing, MI 48909, USA)

  • Philip Chu

    (Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory, NOAA, Ann Arbor, MI 48108, USA)

  • Jon Allan

    (School for Environment and Sustainability, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA)

  • Jeremiah Asher

    (Institute of Water Research, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48823, USA)

  • John Bratton

    (LimnoTech, Ann Arbor, MI 48108, USA)

  • Don Carpenter

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Lawrence Tech University, Soutfield, MI 48220, USA)

  • Dave Dempsey

    (For Love of Water, Traverse City, MI 49684, USA)

  • Chad Drummond

    (Drummond-Carpenter, Orlando, FL 32801, USA)

  • John Esch

    (Office of Geologic Survey, Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy, Lansing, MI 48909, USA)

  • Anne Garwood

    (Water Resources Division, Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy, Lansing, MI 48909, USA)

  • Anna Harrison

    (Institute for Great Lakes Research, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI 48859, USA)

  • Lawrence D. Lemke

    (Institute for Great Lakes Research, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI 48859, USA
    Department of Earth & Atmospheric Sciences, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI 48859, USA)

  • Jim Nicholas

    (Nicholas-h2o, Mason City, MI 48854, USA)

  • Wendy Ogilvie

    (Grand Valley Metro Council, Grand Rapids, MI 49504, USA)

  • Brendan O’Leary

    (Civil and Environmental Engineering, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202, USA)

  • Paul Sachs

    (Ottawa County Department of Strategic Impact, West Olive, MI 49460, USA)

  • Paul Seelbach

    (School for Environment and Sustainability, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA)

  • Teresa Seidel

    (Water Resources Division, Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy, Lansing, MI 48909, USA)

  • Amanda Suchy

    (Institute for Great Lakes Research, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI 48859, USA)

  • John Yellich

    (Michigan Geological Survey, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI 49008, USA)

Abstract

Groundwater historically has been a critical but understudied, underfunded, and underappreciated natural resource, although recent challenges associated with both groundwater quantity and quality have raised its profile. This is particularly true in the Laurentian Great Lakes (LGL) region, where the rich abundance of surface water results in the perception of an unlimited water supply but limited attention on groundwater resources. As a consequence, groundwater management recommendations in the LGL have been severely constrained by our lack of information. To address this information gap, a virtual summit was held in June 2021 that included invited participants from local, state, and federal government entities, universities, non-governmental organizations, and private firms in the region. Both technical (e.g., hydrologists, geologists, ecologists) and policy experts were included, and participants were assigned to an agricultural, urban, or coastal wetland breakout group in advance, based on their expertise. The overall goals of this groundwater summit were fourfold: (1) inventory the key (grand) challenges facing groundwater in Michigan; (2) identify the knowledge gaps and scientific needs, as well as policy recommendations, associated with these challenges; (3) construct a set of conceptual models that elucidate these challenges; and (4) develop a list of (tractable) next steps that can be taken to address these challenges. Absent this type of information, the sustainability of this critical resource is imperiled.

Suggested Citation

  • Alan D. Steinman & Donald G. Uzarski & David P. Lusch & Carol Miller & Patrick Doran & Tom Zimnicki & Philip Chu & Jon Allan & Jeremiah Asher & John Bratton & Don Carpenter & Dave Dempsey & Chad Drumm, 2022. "Groundwater in Crisis? Addressing Groundwater Challenges in Michigan (USA) as a Template for the Great Lakes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-28, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:3008-:d:764144
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/3008/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/3008/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Måns Nilsson & Dave Griggs & Martin Visbeck, 2016. "Policy: Map the interactions between Sustainable Development Goals," Nature, Nature, vol. 534(7607), pages 320-322, June.
    2. Adam Eckerd & Andrew Keeler, 2012. "Going green together? Brownfield remediation and environmental justice," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 45(4), pages 293-314, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Srivardhini K. Jha & E. Richard Gold & Laurette Dubé, 2021. "Modular Interorganizational Network Governance: A Conceptual Framework for Addressing Complex Social Problems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-21, September.
    2. Henrik Skaug Sætra, 2021. "AI in Context and the Sustainable Development Goals: Factoring in the Unsustainability of the Sociotechnical System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    3. Gyula Dörgő & Viktor Sebestyén & János Abonyi, 2018. "Evaluating the Interconnectedness of the Sustainable Development Goals Based on the Causality Analysis of Sustainability Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-26, October.
    4. Joyeeta Gupta & Louis Lebel, 0. "Access and allocation in earth system governance: lessons learnt in the context of the Sustainable Development Goals," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-18.
    5. Lena I. Fuldauer & Scott Thacker & Robyn A. Haggis & Francesco Fuso-Nerini & Robert J. Nicholls & Jim W. Hall, 2022. "Targeting climate adaptation to safeguard and advance the Sustainable Development Goals," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    6. Sara Trucco & Maria Chiara Demartini & Valentina Beretta, 2021. "The reporting of sustainable development goals: is the integrated approach the missing link?," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 1-13, February.
    7. Prashamsa Thapa & Brijesh Mainali & Shobhakar Dhakal, 2023. "Focus on Climate Action: What Level of Synergy and Trade-Off Is There between SDG 13; Climate Action and Other SDGs in Nepal?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-32, January.
    8. Lucia de Strasser, 2017. "Calling for Nexus Thinking in Africa’s Energy Planning," ESP: Energy Scenarios and Policy 263161, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    9. Ida Kubiszewski & Kenneth Mulder & Diane Jarvis & Robert Costanza, 2022. "Toward better measurement of sustainable development and wellbeing: A small number of SDG indicators reliably predict life satisfaction," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 139-148, February.
    10. Dominik Paprotny, 2021. "Convergence Between Developed and Developing Countries: A Centennial Perspective," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 153(1), pages 193-225, January.
    11. Green, T.L., 2018. "Evaluating predictors for brownfield redevelopment," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 299-319.
    12. David Tremblay & François Fortier & Jean‐François Boucher & Olivier Riffon & Claude Villeneuve, 2020. "Sustainable development goal interactions: An analysis based on the five pillars of the 2030 agenda," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(6), pages 1584-1596, November.
    13. Srigiri, Srinivasa Reddy & Breuer, Anita & Scheumann, Waltina, 2021. "Mechanisms for governing the water-land-food nexus in the lower Awash River Basin, Ethiopia: Ensuring policy coherence in the implementation of the 2030 Agenda," IDOS Discussion Papers 26/2021, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    14. Tatiana Korpaniuk* & Yana Ishchenko & Natalia Koval, 2019. "Backgrounds for Improving Resource Management of Agricultural Enterprises Based on Economic Diagnostics of Biofuel Consumption," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 5(2), pages 367-380, 02-2019.
    15. Luciano Barcellos-Paula & Iván De la Vega & Anna María Gil-Lafuente, 2021. "The Quintuple Helix of Innovation Model and the SDGs: Latin-American Countries’ Case and Its Forgotten Effects," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-23, February.
    16. Luca Coscieme & Caroline A. Ochieng & Charles Spillane & Ian Donohue, 2023. "Measuring policy coherence on global access to clean energy between European countries," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 28(5), pages 1-16, June.
    17. Edit Kővári & Katalin Formádi & Zsuzsanna Banász, 2023. "The Green Attitude of Four European Capitals of Culture’s Youth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-19, May.
    18. Shuqi Xin & Ruiyu Dong & Chuyuan Cui & Tingzhang Yang & Xuesong Zhan & Fang Wang & Chaofeng Shao, 2024. "Bibliometric Analysis of Research Hotspots and Frontiers in Progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-17, February.
    19. Jan Anton van Zanten & Rob van Tulder, 2020. "Beyond COVID-19: Applying “SDG logics” for resilient transformations," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 3(4), pages 451-464, December.
    20. Tiffanie F. Stone & Janette R. Thompson & Kurt A. Rosentrater & Ajay Nair, 2021. "A Life Cycle Assessment Approach for Vegetables in Large-, Mid-, and Small-Scale Food Systems in the Midwest US," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-20, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:3008-:d:764144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.