IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i5p2562-d756338.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Mechanical, Assisted and Manual Harvest of Origanum vulgare L

Author

Listed:
  • Antonio Comparetti

    (Department of Agricultural, Food and Forest Sciences, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Building 4, 90128 Palermo, Italy)

  • Carlo Greco

    (Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), Research Centre Protection and Certification, 90011 Bagheria, Italy)

  • Santo Orlando

    (Department of Agricultural, Food and Forest Sciences, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Building 4, 90128 Palermo, Italy)

  • Salvatore Ciulla

    (Association of Producers SiciliaBio, Via Vittorio Emanuele, 100, 92026 Favara, Italy)

  • Michele Massimo Mammano

    (Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), Research Centre Protection and Certification, 90011 Bagheria, Italy)

Abstract

In Italy, the production of Origanum vulgare L. is lower than the national market demand, so there is an increasing interest in this crop, even if the manual harvest and bunch binding represent ca. 60% of the production cost. The aim of this work is to evaluate the harvest efficiency, as well as the working capacity, productivity and quality of mechanical harvesting by means of a reaper-binder designed for cereal and forage crops and assisted harvesting by means of a long-reach edge trimmer. In fact, the final aim is to suggest a machine and a method for oregano harvesting that could significantly reduce the time and, therefore, the cost of this crop operation, while achieving a product quality similar to that obtained by manual harvesting. Tests of mechanical and assisted harvesting were carried out using a reaper-binder after modifying it (i.e., reducing its forward speed, cutting height and bunch size to improve its working capacity, productivity and quality) and an edge trimmer, respectively. The tests of mechanical and assisted harvesting were compared with manual harvesting. In the testing field, with an irregular shape and an area of one hectare, nine rows were selected and divided into three replications, each comprising three tests, i.e., mechanical, assisted and manual harvesting. The modified reaper-binder allowed us to achieve working capacity and productivity rates much higher than those obtained with manual harvesting. Moreover, its harvest quality, in terms of bunch weight and binding height, favourably compares with that manually obtained. Furthermore, the edge trimmer allowed us to achieve working capacity and productivity rates lower than those obtained by means of the reaper-binder but much higher than in manual harvesting. Thus, the reaper-binder can minimise the harvest time and, therefore, cost while harvesting bunches slightly bigger than those manually harvested, even if it requires a high initial investment cost. Instead, the edge trimmer can be a cheap solution for reducing the harvest time and cost. Therefore, mechanical and assisted harvesting could spread oregano production in areas of inland Sicily and other Mediterranean regions that are often cultivated with low-profit herbaceous plant species or lie fallow. Thus, it would be possible to increase farmers’ incomes and job opportunities, as well as preventing or minimising the hydrogeological instability in these areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonio Comparetti & Carlo Greco & Santo Orlando & Salvatore Ciulla & Michele Massimo Mammano, 2022. "Comparison of Mechanical, Assisted and Manual Harvest of Origanum vulgare L," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-12, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2562-:d:756338
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2562/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2562/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Davide Puccio & Antonio Comparetti & Carlo Greco & Salvatore Raimondi, 2022. "Proposal of a Nomenclature for Hydrogeological Instability Risks and Case Studies of Conservative Soil Tillage for Environmental Protection," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Miroslav Macák & Jana Galambošová & František Kumhála & Marek Barát & Milan Kroulík & Karol Šinka & Petr Novák & Vladimír Rataj & Paula A. Misiewicz, 2023. "Reduction in Water Erosion and Soil Loss on Steep Land Managed by Controlled Traffic Farming," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2562-:d:756338. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.