IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i4p2432-d753974.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Impact of “Double Cycle” and Industrial Upgrading on Sustainable High-Quality Economic Development: Application of Spatial and Mediation Models

Author

Listed:
  • Fayuan Wang

    (Department of Economics & Management, Bozhou University, Bozhou 236800, China
    School of Economics and Management, Yangtze University, Jingzhou 434023, China)

  • Rong Wang

    (Business School, Nanjing Xiaozhuang University, Nanjing 211171, China)

  • Zhili He

    (School of Economics and Management, Yangtze University, Jingzhou 434023, China)

Abstract

In the context of the integration into the world economy, the domestic and international cycles of the economy constitute the basic pattern of economic operation. This pattern is closely related to the industrial structure, and obviously it can affect quality of the economic development. The Chinese government has put forward an international and domestic dual cycle strategy for reinforcing an environmentally sustainable high-quality economic development. Similarly, it seems critically important to explore what impact the “dual cycle strategy” and industrial upgrading will have on the environmentally sustainable high-quality economic development. To do so, this paper adopted a dataset ranging from the year 2004 to 2019 from a regional perspective in China, and an empirical research is carried out based on the spatial Dubin model-mediation effect model to analyze the impact of “dual cycle strategy” and industrial upgrading on environmentally sustainable high-quality economic development. The results of the study show that the rising industrial structure effect has emerged prominently. Both the “dual cycle” and industrial structure upgrading have a positive spillover effect on environmentally sustainable high-quality economic development. Further, the direct effect of domestic circulation is significant, but the indirect effect is not obvious. In addition, we found that the direct and indirect effects of international circulation are both significantly positive; industrial upgrading has a partial mediating effect in the “double cycle”. The study holds promising implications for a policy development.

Suggested Citation

  • Fayuan Wang & Rong Wang & Zhili He, 2022. "Exploring the Impact of “Double Cycle” and Industrial Upgrading on Sustainable High-Quality Economic Development: Application of Spatial and Mediation Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2432-:d:753974
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2432/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2432/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marketta Vuola & Mika Korkeakoski & Noora Vähäkari & Michael B. Dwyer & Nicholas J. Hogarth & Jari Kaivo-oja & Jyrki Luukkanen & Eliyan Chea & Try Thuon & Keophousone Phonhalath, 2020. "What is a Green Economy? Review of National-Level Green Economy Policies in Cambodia and Lao PDR," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Maha Mohamed Alsebai Mohamed & Pingfeng Liu & Guihua Nie, 2021. "Are Technological Innovation and Foreign Direct Investment a Way to Boost Economic Growth? An Egyptian Case Study Using the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-28, March.
    3. Clark, William Roberts & Reichert, Usha Nair & Lomas, Sandra Lynn & Parker, Kevin L., 1998. "International and Domestic Constraints on Political Business Cycles in OECD Economies," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 52(1), pages 87-120, January.
    4. Swinnen, Johan & Kuijpers, Rob, 2019. "Value chain innovations for technology transfer in developing and emerging economies: Conceptual issues, typology, and policy implications," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 298-309.
    5. Tomoya Mori & Tony E. Smith, 2011. "An Industrial Agglomeration Approach To Central Place And City Size Regularities," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(4), pages 694-731, October.
    6. Peneder, Michael, 2003. "Industrial structure and aggregate growth," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 14(4), pages 427-448, December.
    7. Seya, Hajime & Tsutsumi, Morito & Yamagata, Yoshiki, 2012. "Income convergence in Japan: A Bayesian spatial Durbin model approach," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 60-71.
    8. Paun Cristian & Ivascu Cosmin, 2021. "The impact of EU’s financial support on the agriculture’s development: a panel data analysis," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 16(2), pages 86-100, June.
    9. Gene M. Grossman & Alan B. Krueger, 1995. "Economic Growth and the Environment," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 110(2), pages 353-377.
    10. Renato Garcia & Ulisses Pereira dos Santos & Wilson Suzigan, 2020. "Industrial upgrade, economic catch-up and industrial policy in Brazil: general trends and the specific case of the mining industry [Upgrade industrial, catch-up econômico e política industrial no Bras," Nova Economia, Economics Department, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Brazil), vol. 30(spe), pages 1089-1114, December.
    11. Lane, Philip R, 2001. "International Trade and Economic Convergence: The Credit Channel," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 53(2), pages 221-240, April.
    12. Francesca Bassi & Mariangela Guidolin, 2021. "Resource Efficiency and Circular Economy in European SMEs: Investigating the Role of Green Jobs and Skills," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, November.
    13. Wei Zhang & Siqi Zhao & Xiaoyu Wan & Yuan Yao, 2021. "Study on the effect of digital economy on high-quality economic development in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-27, September.
    14. Price, Lynn & Levine, Mark D. & Zhou, Nan & Fridley, David & Aden, Nathaniel & Lu, Hongyou & McNeil, Michael & Zheng, Nina & Qin, Yining & Yowargana, Ping, 2011. "Assessment of China's energy-saving and emission-reduction accomplishments and opportunities during the 11th Five Year Plan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 2165-2178, April.
    15. Masahiko Aoki, 2012. "The Five Phases of Economic Development and Institutional Evolution in China, Japan, and Korea," International Economic Association Series, in: Masahiko Aoki & Timur Kuran & Gérard Roland (ed.), Institutions and Comparative Economic Development, chapter 1, pages 13-47, Palgrave Macmillan.
    16. René Pawera & František Vojtech & Michal Levický & Stanislav Filip, 2020. "Effects and motivation of political - economic cooperation between two countries: a case study of Slovakia and Austria," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(1), pages 454-470, September.
    17. Aamir Inam Bhutta & Muhammad Rizwan Ullah & Jahanzaib Sultan & Ahsan Riaz & Muhammad Fayyaz Sheikh, 2022. "Impact of Green Energy Production, Green Innovation, Financial Development on Environment Quality: A Role of Country Governance in Pakistan," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(1), pages 316-326.
    18. Wang, Rong & Tan, Junlan & Yao, Shuangliang, 2021. "Are natural resources a blessing or a curse for economic development? The importance of energy innovations," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    19. Masahiko Aoki, 2011. "The Five-Phases of Economic Development and Institutional Evolution in China and Japan," Development Economics Working Papers 23196, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    20. Ferrara, Laurent, 2003. "A three-regime real-time indicator for the US economy," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 81(3), pages 373-378, December.
    21. Viktor Koval & Piotr Olczak & Nataliia Vdovenko & Olena Boiko & Dominika Matuszewska & Inesa Mikhno, 2021. "Ecosystem of Environmentally Sustainable Municipal Infrastructure in Ukraine," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-22, September.
    22. Bouncken, Ricarda & Ratzmann, Martin & Barwinski, Roman & Kraus, Sascha, 2020. "Coworking spaces: Empowerment for entrepreneurship and innovation in the digital and sharing economy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 102-110.
    23. Yulia Gruzina & Irina Firsova & Wadim Strielkowski, 2021. "Dynamics of Human Capital Development in Economic Development Cycles," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-18, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. He, Yuan & Li, Ke & Wang, Yipan, 2022. "Crossing the digital divide: The impact of the digital economy on elderly individuals’ consumption upgrade in China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    2. Razzaq, Asif & Yang, Xiaodong, 2023. "Digital finance and green growth in China: Appraising inclusive digital finance using web crawler technology and big data," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    3. Yan Mei & Jingyi Miao & Yuhui Lu, 2022. "Digital Villages Construction Accelerates High-Quality Economic Development in Rural China through Promoting Digital Entrepreneurship," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-29, October.
    4. Yuan Feng & Liyuan Wang & Changfei Nie, 2024. "Can place-based policy reduce carbon emissions? Evidence from industrial transformation and upgrading exemplary zone in China," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    5. Debin Ma & Jie Zhang & Ziyi Wang & Dongqi Sun, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Evolution and Influencing Factors of Open Economy Development in the Yangtze River Delta Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-24, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aoki, Masahiko, 2014. "Economic and Political Transitions from Premodern to Modern States in the Meiji Restoration and Xinhai Revolution: A Strategic Approach," ADBI Working Papers 486, Asian Development Bank Institute.
    2. Zhang, Shangfeng & Liu, Yaoxin & Huang, Duen-Huang, 2021. "Understanding the mystery of continued rapid economic growth," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 529-537.
    3. Aoki, Masahiko & Rothwell, Geoffrey, 2013. "A comparative institutional analysis of the Fukushima nuclear disaster: Lessons and policy implications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 240-247.
    4. Rong Wang & Fayuan Wang, 2022. "Exploring the Role of Green Finance and Energy Development towards High-Quality Economic Development: Application of Spatial Durbin Model and Intermediary Effect Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-17, July.
    5. Mehmet Hanefi Topal, 2020. "The Middle Income Trap: Theory and Empirical Evidence," Bogazici Journal, Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies, Bogazici University, Department of Economics, vol. 34(1), pages 51-75.
    6. Chiroleu-Assouline, Mireille & Fodha, Mouez & Kirat, Yassine, 2020. "Carbon curse in developed countries," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    7. Li, Li & Hong, Xuefei & Peng, Ke, 2019. "A spatial panel analysis of carbon emissions, economic growth and high-technology industry in China," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 83-92.
    8. Wanping Yang & Jinkai Zhao, 2018. "Sources of China’s Economic Growth: A Case for Green Accounting," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 8(2), pages 1-3.
    9. Qu, Chenyao & Shao, Jun & Shi, Zhenkai, 2020. "Does financial agglomeration promote the increase of energy efficiency in China?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    10. Su, Yifan & Xu, Guanghua, 2022. "Low-carbon transformation of natural resource industry in China: Determinants and policy implications to achieve COP26 targets," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    11. Wu, Haitao & Xue, Yan & Hao, Yu & Ren, Siyu, 2021. "How does internet development affect energy-saving and emission reduction? Evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    12. Xiaodan Gao & Yinhui Wang, 2023. "From Investment to the Environment: Exploring the Relationship between the Coordinated Development of Two-Way FDI and Carbon Productivity under Fiscal Decentralization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-20, December.
    13. Yang, Yuxue & Su, Xiang & Yao, Shuangliang, 2021. "Nexus between green finance, fintech, and high-quality economic development: Empirical evidence from China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    14. Tu, Zhengge & Hu, Tianyang & Shen, Renjun, 2019. "Evaluating public participation impact on environmental protection and ecological efficiency in China: Evidence from PITI disclosure," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 111-123.
    15. Wang, Jianda & Dong, Kangyin & Dong, Xiucheng & Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad, 2022. "Assessing the digital economy and its carbon-mitigation effects: The case of China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    16. Wang, Qingri & Hu, Hongwei & Hu, Rumei, 2024. "Local government behavior in rural construction land marketization in China: An archetype analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    17. Qingyan Zhu, 2023. "How Will the Relationship between Technological Innovation and Green Total Factor Productivity Change under the Influence of Service-Oriented Upgrading of Industrial Structure?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.
    18. Na Zhou & Jinkai Zhao & Kai Zhao & Dong Li, 2021. "Analysis on the Sources of China’s Economic Growth From the Perspective of Cleaner Production," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440219, April.
    19. Wanping Yang & Jinkai Zhao, 2018. "Study On China’S Economic Development From The Perspective Of Strong Sustainability," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 65(01), pages 161-192, April.
    20. Venkatachalam ANBUMOZHI & Ponciano S. INTAL, Jr., 2015. "Can Thinking Green and Sustainability Be an Economic Opportunity for ASEAN?," Working Papers DP-2015-66, Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2432-:d:753974. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.