IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i4p2143-d748616.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Difference of Soil Aggregates Composition, Stability, and Organic Carbon Content between Eroded and Depositional Areas after Adding Exogenous Organic Materials

Author

Listed:
  • Mingzhao Han

    (College of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China)

  • Miaomiao Wang

    (College of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China)

  • Guoqing Zhai

    (College of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China)

  • Yongjiang Li

    (College of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China)

  • Supu Yu

    (College of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China)

  • Enheng Wang

    (College of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China)

Abstract

Black soil in northeastern China has suffered widespread soil degradation due to long-term cultivation while causing eroded–depositional landscapes, leading to soil-associated carbon redistribution. In agricultural systems, adding exogenous organic material to degraded soil is a common measure to improve soil aggregate stability and soil quality. However, differences in soil properties may alter the decomposition and turnover of organic material in aggregates. Using a uniform method to restore the eroded (E) and depositional (D) soils is inefficient. Therefore, an indoor constant temperature and humidity incubation experiment with the addition of three organic materials, namely, straw (S), biochar (B), and swine manure (M), was designed with an equal amount of carbon. Soil aggregate composition, stability, and organic carbon from eroded and depositional soils were analyzed for evaluating the amendment efficiency of soil quality by exogenous organic material addition. The main results were as follows: adding straw and swine manure could effectively promote >2-mm aggregates formation (E: 7.1%, 8.8%; D: 17.3%, 8.6%) and significantly improved the mean weight diameter ( MWD ) (E: 0.45 mm, 0.52 mm; D: 0.96 mm, 0.54 mm), while the addition of biochar significantly increased the proportion of 0.25–2-mm aggregates (E: 7.9%; D: 10.9%), but the effect of improving MWD was less than straw and swine manure. All the three organic materials could significantly increase soil total organic carbon (TOC) (S, B and M: 1.95, 3.12 and 2.46 g·kg −1 ) in the eroded area, and the effect of biochar was the best, whereas it was not significant for the soil in the depositional area. Specially, adding swine manure and adding straw is more beneficial to the restoration of eroded areas and depositional areas, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Mingzhao Han & Miaomiao Wang & Guoqing Zhai & Yongjiang Li & Supu Yu & Enheng Wang, 2022. "Difference of Soil Aggregates Composition, Stability, and Organic Carbon Content between Eroded and Depositional Areas after Adding Exogenous Organic Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-12, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2143-:d:748616
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2143/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2143/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ziru Niu & Yongzhong Su & Juan Li & Fangjiao An & Tingna Liu, 2023. "Effect of Attapulgite Application on Aggregate Formation and Carbon and Nitrogen Content in Sandy Soil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-16, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2143-:d:748616. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.